Guest
|
Posted: Tue, Mar 15 2011, 2:23 pm EDT Post subject: Re: CRANBURY: $10.8M budget would include 2-cent tax rate hike |
|
|
Guest wrote: | By cutting aid and capping tax increases to 2%, Gov. Christie is doing the right thing for the state and the town budgets, but it is a long term plan and most towns had to increase local taxes last year to deal with the big cuts in state aid. I believe the average increase in NJ municipal taxes last year was 4% state wide. Based on the unknown impact of these coming changes, we should not use our surplus at all, especially to fill in gaps on a budget that has either not enough revenues or too many expenses.
NJ is about to undergo a big change in how much we spend, which is totally necessary, and Cranbury should have an ample surplus to ease through that change without deteriorating our schools and township services. We are a premier town that has been run extremely well for a long time; people have no idea what other towns are going through right now. If we have to do a modest tax increase to get through these changes, it is unfortunate but seems necessary. If we get more than anticipated state aid or increased revenues from our ratables, those will be good problems to have, but I don’t want to “hope” they happen in the future and deplete our surplus to solve our current problem. |
When Christie cuts the state mandates, I will agree with you. Until then he has just shifted the burden to municipalities. I would call it gutless, but I still hold out hope he cuts the mandates. |
|