| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:30 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
 |
|
| The library flip flop is classic. It amazes me how someone to get elected goes from supporting the use of taxes to build the new library to now saying something completely different. This is a real character flaw and is why I will not be voting for Susan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:32 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | I still cant believe it is only now coming out about Susan wanting take away everyone's property rights by forcing a policy which would stop anyone from being able to remove a tree from their property. This is an extreme stance and not what we want here in Cranbury. That is why I will not be voting for Susan. |
You realize that everyone now gets that you're just making stuff up, right? You've already been made a fool of on your claim about her attendance and you've already been called out for not backing this claim up about property rights with any proof too. No one is buying it. Whether they support Susan or Karen, the sensible majority knows the smell of pure BS.
If you have some real claims, why not actually post some proof instead of these easily contradicted sound bites? |
Why are you panicking and replying everytime? Because you know truth about Susan and your scared of the truth finally getting out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:34 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | This flip flopping on the library to get elected is bad. So is making us all have to get permission to remove trees from our property. I guess Susan has done a good job until now hiding here extreme left wing ideology.
| Guest wrote: | Susans stance has changed publicly about the library. What you hear at meetings face to face is very different from what she said candidates night or on her web site. Same goes for her radical stance on forcing home owners to get permission from the town to have a tree removed from their property. Susan has done a very good job of hiding these stances while having her supporters come here to this blog and disparaged her opponent Karen.
| Guest wrote: | | Susan has stated repeatedly we can't use tax dollars. That she like all the current members and Karen have said let the library go for it through private donations. |
|
|
Ha, are we already back to this? I guess the EC attendance argument wasn't working. And to think that we made it almost 2 pages with a real adult conversation that didn't involve lies and rumors. |
discredit the facts that that Susan is an extremist with her view that home owners must get permission to take down a dead tree on their property is a typical tactic used by the far left. Say its not true so it must not be. We have seen this before. Next will come Susans post saying its not true. Of course it will be with the wink and nod to the far left in town. |
Disprove that you are an idiot and have a secret fetish for golf balls. How exactly do you disprove it? Go for it.
You made unsubstantiated claims. You need to prove your claims with proof not the other way around.
We're all laughing at you -- even most of the Karen supporters here. Because it's just so obvious you're making stuff up as you go and have absolutely zero basis for it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:35 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | This flip flopping on the library to get elected is bad. So is making us all have to get permission to remove trees from our property. I guess Susan has done a good job until now hiding here extreme left wing ideology.
| Guest wrote: | Susans stance has changed publicly about the library. What you hear at meetings face to face is very different from what she said candidates night or on her web site. Same goes for her radical stance on forcing home owners to get permission from the town to have a tree removed from their property. Susan has done a very good job of hiding these stances while having her supporters come here to this blog and disparaged her opponent Karen.
| Guest wrote: | | Susan has stated repeatedly we can't use tax dollars. That she like all the current members and Karen have said let the library go for it through private donations. |
|
|
Ha, are we already back to this? I guess the EC attendance argument wasn't working. And to think that we made it almost 2 pages with a real adult conversation that didn't involve lies and rumors. |
discredit the facts that that Susan is an extremist with her view that home owners must get permission to take down a dead tree on their property is a typical tactic used by the far left. Say its not true so it must not be. We have seen this before. Next will come Susans post saying its not true. Of course it will be with the wink and nod to the far left in town. |
Basic intelligence would suggest that if you want to present something as fact, it is on you to provide the evidence to back it up. Though judging by the composition of your reply, basic intelligence might not be so basic for everyone. You are saying that when lies and rumors are spread it is the responsibility of the accused to provide facts to contradict the baseless lies? Not only that, you are also saying that even if the accused does discredit the lies it still won't be enough. If that is in fact the case then I am going to refer back to the poster who, in humor, posted that Karen has dog fights going on in her basement. Now is it on Karen to come on here to dispute those claims, and even then she is probably only lying? That's the way this works, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:35 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | I still cant believe it is only now coming out about Susan wanting take away everyone's property rights by forcing a policy which would stop anyone from being able to remove a tree from their property. This is an extreme stance and not what we want here in Cranbury. That is why I will not be voting for Susan. |
You realize that everyone now gets that you're just making stuff up, right? You've already been made a fool of on your claim about her attendance and you've already been called out for not backing this claim up about property rights with any proof too. No one is buying it. Whether they support Susan or Karen, the sensible majority knows the smell of pure BS.
If you have some real claims, why not actually post some proof instead of these easily contradicted sound bites? |
Why are you panicking and replying everytime? Because you know truth about Susan and your scared of the truth finally getting out. |
Pot meet kettle.
I'll tell you why I'm replying. Because I'm laughing out loud at you. And I'm egging you one because you're so over the top crazy. So I want to keep you going. So by all means, keep it up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:36 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| I honestly feel bad for Karen at this point. She doesn't deserve to be tied to this moron. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:39 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
Wow, this topic has gone totally crazy. If I were Karen I would chime in to disown this poster before she loses votes by association. I like her personally and imagine she would be sickened by this person trying to sling all the mud.
Similarly, Susan should disavow the tea party poster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:40 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | This flip flopping on the library to get elected is bad. So is making us all have to get permission to remove trees from our property. I guess Susan has done a good job until now hiding here extreme left wing ideology.
| Guest wrote: | Susans stance has changed publicly about the library. What you hear at meetings face to face is very different from what she said candidates night or on her web site. Same goes for her radical stance on forcing home owners to get permission from the town to have a tree removed from their property. Susan has done a very good job of hiding these stances while having her supporters come here to this blog and disparaged her opponent Karen.
| Guest wrote: | | Susan has stated repeatedly we can't use tax dollars. That she like all the current members and Karen have said let the library go for it through private donations. |
|
|
Ha, are we already back to this? I guess the EC attendance argument wasn't working. And to think that we made it almost 2 pages with a real adult conversation that didn't involve lies and rumors. |
discredit the facts that that Susan is an extremist with her view that home owners must get permission to take down a dead tree on their property is a typical tactic used by the far left. Say its not true so it must not be. We have seen this before. Next will come Susans post saying its not true. Of course it will be with the wink and nod to the far left in town. |
Basic intelligence would suggest that if you want to present something as fact, it is on you to provide the evidence to back it up. Though judging by the composition of your reply, basic intelligence might not be so basic for everyone. You are saying that when lies and rumors are spread it is the responsibility of the accused to provide facts to contradict the baseless lies? Not only that, you are also saying that even if the accused does discredit the lies it still won't be enough. If that is in fact the case then I am going to refer back to the poster who, in humor, posted that Karen has dog fights going on in her basement. Now is it on Karen to come on here to dispute those claims, and even then she is probably only lying? That's the way this works, right? |
The dog fights while inappropriate was someones bad attempt at humor. Susan advocating to secure the far left in town by letting them all know she supports forcing property owners to need permission from the town when removing a tree from their property and saying in private she will fight for the use of public money instead of private for the library is all very real and factual. We have seen this before with previous committees. They have been out of power for one year and want it back badly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:41 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| I feel bad for Susan since here helpers on here have really gone too far and have done her a disservice by attacking Karen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:44 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | This flip flopping on the library to get elected is bad. So is making us all have to get permission to remove trees from our property. I guess Susan has done a good job until now hiding here extreme left wing ideology.
| Guest wrote: | Susans stance has changed publicly about the library. What you hear at meetings face to face is very different from what she said candidates night or on her web site. Same goes for her radical stance on forcing home owners to get permission from the town to have a tree removed from their property. Susan has done a very good job of hiding these stances while having her supporters come here to this blog and disparaged her opponent Karen.
| Guest wrote: | | Susan has stated repeatedly we can't use tax dollars. That she like all the current members and Karen have said let the library go for it through private donations. |
|
|
Ha, are we already back to this? I guess the EC attendance argument wasn't working. And to think that we made it almost 2 pages with a real adult conversation that didn't involve lies and rumors. |
discredit the facts that that Susan is an extremist with her view that home owners must get permission to take down a dead tree on their property is a typical tactic used by the far left. Say its not true so it must not be. We have seen this before. Next will come Susans post saying its not true. Of course it will be with the wink and nod to the far left in town. |
Basic intelligence would suggest that if you want to present something as fact, it is on you to provide the evidence to back it up. Though judging by the composition of your reply, basic intelligence might not be so basic for everyone. You are saying that when lies and rumors are spread it is the responsibility of the accused to provide facts to contradict the baseless lies? Not only that, you are also saying that even if the accused does discredit the lies it still won't be enough. If that is in fact the case then I am going to refer back to the poster who, in humor, posted that Karen has dog fights going on in her basement. Now is it on Karen to come on here to dispute those claims, and even then she is probably only lying? That's the way this works, right? |
The dog fights while inappropriate was someones bad attempt at humor. Susan advocating to secure the far left in town by letting them all know she supports forcing property owners to need permission from the town when removing a tree from their property and saying in private she will fight for the use of public money instead of private for the library is all very real and factual. We have seen this before with previous committees. They have been out of power for one year and want it back badly. |
Okay, great, now maybe we can get somewhere. You say, in a run on sentence, that it is factual and well known. So you should have no problem citing the evidence of the facts. Links to previous statements by her perhaps? Or letters. Or postings. Or comments from the minutes of the Environmental Commission. Or attributions made to an individual you can name. Anything. If so, great. If not, it's not a fact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:45 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | This flip flopping on the library to get elected is bad. So is making us all have to get permission to remove trees from our property. I guess Susan has done a good job until now hiding here extreme left wing ideology.
| Guest wrote: | Susans stance has changed publicly about the library. What you hear at meetings face to face is very different from what she said candidates night or on her web site. Same goes for her radical stance on forcing home owners to get permission from the town to have a tree removed from their property. Susan has done a very good job of hiding these stances while having her supporters come here to this blog and disparaged her opponent Karen.
| Guest wrote: | | Susan has stated repeatedly we can't use tax dollars. That she like all the current members and Karen have said let the library go for it through private donations. |
|
|
Ha, are we already back to this? I guess the EC attendance argument wasn't working. And to think that we made it almost 2 pages with a real adult conversation that didn't involve lies and rumors. |
discredit the facts that that Susan is an extremist with her view that home owners must get permission to take down a dead tree on their property is a typical tactic used by the far left. Say its not true so it must not be. We have seen this before. Next will come Susans post saying its not true. Of course it will be with the wink and nod to the far left in town. |
Basic intelligence would suggest that if you want to present something as fact, it is on you to provide the evidence to back it up. Though judging by the composition of your reply, basic intelligence might not be so basic for everyone. You are saying that when lies and rumors are spread it is the responsibility of the accused to provide facts to contradict the baseless lies? Not only that, you are also saying that even if the accused does discredit the lies it still won't be enough. If that is in fact the case then I am going to refer back to the poster who, in humor, posted that Karen has dog fights going on in her basement. Now is it on Karen to come on here to dispute those claims, and even then she is probably only lying? That's the way this works, right? |
The dog fights while inappropriate was someones bad attempt at humor. Susan advocating to secure the far left in town by letting them all know she supports forcing property owners to need permission from the town when removing a tree from their property and saying in private she will fight for the use of public money instead of private for the library is all very real and factual. We have seen this before with previous committees. They have been out of power for one year and want it back badly. |
So are you outing yourself as a member of the far left? How else are you privy to such insider information? Also, let me introduce you to a comma "," and a period ".". Commas are often used to break up thoughts in your sentence. Periods are used to finish your sentence before you start a new one. For the sake of this argument try you best at implementing them somewhere in your long, rambling lies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:49 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| I am done feeding this troll. I trust that the voters of Cranbury will make an educated and logical vote, based on facts. Maybe after the election some civility will be restored. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 4:59 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | I am done feeding this troll. I trust that the voters of Cranbury will make an educated and logical vote, based on facts. Maybe after the election some civility will be restored. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 5:13 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | I feel bad for Susan since here helpers on here have really gone too far and have done her a disservice by attacking Karen. |
And I feel bad for Karen, since her helpers feel the need to make up Susan's postions out or whole cloth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 5:50 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | I feel bad for Susan since here helpers on here have really gone too far and have done her a disservice by attacking Karen. |
And I feel bad for Karen, since her helpers feel the need to make up Susan's postions out or whole cloth. |
I feel even worse for Susan since her helpers on here have really gone too far and have done her a disservice by attacking Karen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Oct 20 2011, 7:27 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TC election |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | I feel bad for Susan since here helpers on here have really gone too far and have done her a disservice by attacking Karen. |
And I feel bad for Karen, since her helpers feel the need to make up Susan's postions out or whole cloth. |
I feel even worse for Susan since her helpers on here have really gone too far and have done her a disservice by attacking Karen. |
You seem to be repeating yourself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
