The September 22, 2008 Township Committee agenda has been posted.

[Jersey Dad]

CC,
I am not offended when people vehemently disagree with me and I would rather have someone tell me they think I have phrased something in a "borderline offensive" way than to simply walk away offended. I sincerely appreciate the feedback and the opportunity to clarify.

I do not agree that I am responsible for "making" affordable housing a divisive issue. It is a divisive issue and it is difficult to discuss without tapping into deep emotions. For example, among my neighbors, sentiments on the Township's plans range from blind faith to conspiracy theories and everywhere in between. Most of my neighbors seem to want a less impactful development than what has been proposed at the Route 130 D Site, which is adjacent to my neighborhood and near my house.

I thought it was common knowledge that I am advocating this, but I certainly don't mind the disclosure. In fact, I am willing to tell anyone who will listen (some might say "ad nausium") why a less impactful plan at the Route 130 D Site is the best interests of my neighbors, the township and my family.

Thanks again for your feedback.
Dave

[Cranbury Conservative]

Dave in the end its all a good debate and I welcome the back in forth in the future as it does bring to light good ideas.

I would like to point something else out regarding Affordable Housing Development near your home.

At the TC meeting when the resolution to build Affordable Housing with higher density was raised I showed up to speak out against it as I agreed with both you and your neighbors that the ordinance the TC was trying to pass was wrong.

My comments were as follows….

“Mr. Dan Mulligan, 32 Old Cranbury Road, stated he was pleased the Ordinance was put to rest and recommended the Township wait until COAH makes its final decision before taking any action. He raised his concern with the density issue. He also asked that the Township put more COAH updates on the Township’s web site. Mayor Stout indicated the Township would put a hot link on the Township’s web site so residents can be better informed. Mr. Panconi added that every day there are ongoing articles in both the Star Ledger and Home News regarding COAH legislation and issues.”

When I was reviewing the minutes I noticed Mr. Ritter spoke at that meeting as well….

“Mr. John Ritter, Plainsboro Road, suggested working with the State to allow a U-turn at Dey Road or to find a spot where people could make a U-turn before Dey Road. Ms. Marcelli responded the State does not encourage U-turns and that Dey Road had been dramatically improved about five (5) years ago by a private developer at no cost to the Township. Unfortunately, there is not enough land to have a turn-around at Dey Road. Ms. Marcelli offered to start a dialogue with the State D.O.T. to see what could be done. “

I am concerned that he chose to not speak out about the ordinance that would have enabled the new higher density Affordable Housing to be built near both you and your neighbors homes in Cranbury Estates. In fact his main concern at that meeting was a U-Turn on Dey road. I can only theorize the point, however it appears he did not want to go against the TC on this issue which has to make you wonder…..

[Guest]

Way off topic, but the meeting notes remind me. One thing I've heard in TC meetings from both TC and residents is the mispronounciation of Dey road. It is pronounced Die not Day, as that was how the Dey family who the road was named after pronounced the name.

Sorry, just a way off topic point that reminded me.

[Jersey Dad]

Dan,
Thank you for your vocal support. My neighbors and I have been working hard to raise awareness about our concerns about the 130 D Site with both candidates, the various TC members and all Cranbury residents.