View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jeff M. Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Jun 27 2009, 8:41 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
Sorry, the above was from me, I forgot to add my name. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest343 Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Jun 27 2009, 9:28 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
Jeff again thank you for your interest in this topic. Obviously you do not have any first hand knowledge or experience regarding how Fire or EMS function. You are trying educate yourself which is admirable. Unfortunatelly you have been misled or misinformed. First of all Monroe (Career) EMS covers Jamesburg during weekdays. Because of Jamesburg's geographical proximity to Monroe EMS's Satellite Station Monroe is able to provide coverage to a portion of their town and Jamesburg without compromising response times. This would not be possible in Cranbury. Jamesburg residents are billed when they utilize a Monroe Ambulance. The 6 square miles listed on the squads website includes a portion of the NJ Tpke which is actually in Monroe but has been covered by Jamesburg Squad since the inception of the Tpke in 1949. Mutual Aid is not intended for day to day operations. Mutual Aid is to provide neighboring towns with coverage during temporary surges of call volume or unusual incidents that require multiple resources. To truly educate yourself about the problems facing EMS coverage in New Jersey you should read the following study http://www.state.nj.us/health/ems/emsreport.shtml.
I dont want to get into it because this bulletin board is intended for Cranbury Topics but your characterization of the Robbinsville situation is grossly incorrect. The problems started when the mayor tried to (and did) succesfully dissolve the fire district so that the EMS and Fire Service was provided directly by the township. As a cost cutting effort the mayor attempted to replace full time employees with perdiems. This has largelly been a failure. If you have have ever had to work with temp employees or had a substitute teacher you can understand why.
Anyway read the study.It will clear up a lot of your misconceptions.
Oh by the way I dont work for Robbinsville and I am not related to anyone that does. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff M. Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Jun 27 2009, 9:53 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
Actually, I do have experience though admittedly not for many years. We have to agree to disagree on the issue as it pertains to Cranbury's needs at this time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest343 Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Jun 27 2009, 10:13 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
thats cool |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
1st Aid Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Jun 27 2009, 10:26 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
Having a paid squad does not have to cost the town anything. The squad could bill the person or business they respond to and let the insurance cover it.
Unfortunately the Cranbury squad does not respond to too many calls lately. If you look at the calls and who responded you will find that Monroe or Plainsboro quite frequently cover the first aid calls.
The horn is outdated, I believe most members have pagers at present. The horn just makes that annoying noise ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Jun 27 2009, 10:59 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
If you can find a people who are available to be paid per call and only per call that is great idea. However, if you are expecting a staff of people or a couple of people to be present and on call during a period of time then you need to be able to cover that expense with the calls. If no calls come in during a day, then the expenses for that group need to be covered outside of that budget. If the squad feels there is a business case for this it would be good to see it presented. The concern is that it becomes a slippery slope and then these employees seek unionization, benefits, etc...and the costs aren't covered. The one thing that doesn't seem to get reported is how many First Aid calls are answered or come in as opposed to police and fire.
The best solution it appears would be to utilize more township employees and pay them as we already do the three employees already providing this type of service. Then they are not employees of the squad or department and the costs can be offset with insurance with less cost than a dedicated employee of the squad or department. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun, Jun 28 2009, 7:47 am EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
We can discuss the pros and cons all day. In the end I hope that these calls get answered in a timely manner. Too often someone who needs help is left waiting 20 plus minutes for a surrounding town to respond because Cranbury members are unavailable.
Whatever is the correct way to go, lets get moving on it so people are transported quickly to the hospital. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest343 Guest
|
Posted: Sun, Jun 28 2009, 5:55 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
Guest wrote: | We can discuss the pros and cons all day. In the end I hope that these calls get answered in a timely manner. Too often someone who needs help is left waiting 20 plus minutes for a surrounding town to respond because Cranbury members are unavailable.
Whatever is the correct way to go, lets get moving on it so people are transported quickly to the hospital. |
You are right. The answer may not be easy or cheap but it must be addressed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun, Jun 28 2009, 7:30 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
Quote: | The best solution it appears would be to utilize more township employees and pay them as we already do the three employees already providing this type of service. |
This would only work if the township employees are able/willing to serve. Not everyone is suited to be a first responder to car accidents, heart attacks and other emergency situations. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun, Jun 28 2009, 7:51 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
It would seem to be best to go that route and seek out potential employees than to go straight to the paid squad would it not. The town has approved only three slots and there may be others who would do it if offered the additional compensation which is smaller than creating jobs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jersey Dad
Joined: Tue, May 20 2008, 11:02 pm EDT Posts: 179 Location: Cranbury Estates
|
Posted: Mon, Jun 29 2009, 9:38 am EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
Guest343 wrote: | The fire whistle wakes up your 2 year old?Suck it up. |
Guest343,
The comment I made about the horn waking up my daughter was not a complaint. It was a response to a poster who incorrectly assumed that the horn isn't disruptive to residents in its current location. Thanks anyway for your neighborly compassion.
Like many residents, when the horn goes off, I typically say a prayer for the volunteers and victims and go back to sleep. I am grateful for the volunteers, and I respect their time and commitment, which is why I went on to say that we should support aggressive measures to reduce false alarms. Changing the location of the horn, or even eliminating the horn, won't help the volunteers. Reducing false alarms will benefit everyone.
JD |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
publius Guest
|
Posted: Tue, Jun 30 2009, 12:00 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
A fire horn is a silly idea. Unless you expect people to form a bucket brigade.............that would make sense. Firefighters have cell phones and other devices. Who wants to hear that annoying bellow at 3 in the morning? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue, Jun 30 2009, 12:55 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
"Who wants to hear that annoying bellow at 3 in the morning?"
Ummmm....the firefighters. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
publius Guest
|
Posted: Tue, Jun 30 2009, 1:30 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
Guest wrote: | "Who wants to hear that annoying bellow at 3 in the morning?"
Ummmm....the firefighters. |
OI VEY!!!!!!!
Another one who doesn't pay attention. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
funny Guest
|
Posted: Tue, Jun 30 2009, 2:20 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
I'm quite happy that they move it further away from my home. And if it is not that high up, fewer people will suffer from it...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fuel_to_the_fire Guest
|
Posted: Tue, Jun 30 2009, 3:00 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Fire Horn |
|
|
An article about Rowley, Mass. fire siren from 2008. Seems to touch on a lot of the issues folks are talking about.
Published: June 12, 2008 03:00 am ShareThisPrintThis
Fire horn must blow, chief says
By Lynne Hendricks
Correspondent
ROWLEY — The town's fire horn may become less frequent, but it's not going away.
In response to residents' questions about the frequency and necessity of the fire horn, fire Chief James Broderick said this week the horn serves a vital function as a second line of fire defense, and while reducing the number of blasts is possible, it's not in the town's best interest to retire the horn completely.
"We are required to have a secondary means of dispatching the alarm if the primary means becomes disabled," he wrote to selectmen. If the paging system is down, "the dispatch center would need to have the ability to sound the alarm."
The horn has been blowing from Town Hall's cupola since the early 1900s, and is typically tested each day at noon. Despite technological advances in the form of pagers and cell phones, there is nothing quite as effective as a horn blast to get firefighters on the scene of an emergency, Broderick said.
Rowley's mostly volunteer Fire Department, he noted, responds to calls from firefighters' homes — not from the Hammond Street station. While a few of the full-time firefighters have Nextel direct lines, he adds, the rest of the force use individual private cell phone carriers.
"There is no capability to 'group call' any of the firefighters using these phones," writes Broderick.
The pagers and the horn are all Rowley's got, he said, until the day it can afford and justify establishing its own 24-hour Fire Department. But in the meantime, Broderick said there are definitely ways to reduce the number of times the horn sounds, by initiating policies successfully being used in neighboring towns, for instance. He suggested the town consider blowing the horn only in the case of structure fires, automatic fire alarms, by direction of a chief officer of the Fire Department, and for mutual aid requests.
"This particular policy comes from the West Newbury Fire Department, and could be adopted by (Rowley) with little problem," Broderick says.
If the town were to adopt that policy, he adds, the horn would not sound in the case of trees or wires down, carbon monoxide or medical calls, or assists to the public.
"With the reduction of the use of the horn it should reduce by 50 percent the amount of times the horn sounds, and will reduce the chance of the horn blowing during the night hours," Broderick told selectmen.
Selectmen voted to support the chief's letter, which will be sent out to satisfy questions raised by Town Hall neighbor Kristopher Reynolds last week.
"We definitely want to keep the fire horn blowing," added selectmen Chairman Dave Petersen. "Homeland Security mandates we have some sort of alternate system."
Selectman Stuart Dalzell concurred, raising the specter of only two firefighters showing up to fight a fire because of dead batteries or cellular "dead spots", with no other means to bring out the cavalry. Selectman Jack Cook, a lifelong resident, agreed.
"We don't want to jeopardize the people of this town," said Cook. "That's what (the horn) is for." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|