View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri, Aug 19 2011, 4:45 pm EDT Post subject: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
Maybe we could start putting political signs out in front of our houses in October -- for sure not until after Cranbury Day |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri, Aug 19 2011, 6:50 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
[quote="Guest"]Maybe we could start putting political signs out in front of our houses in October -- for sure not until after Cranbury Day[/quote
They all have to be changed anyway, Fried has dropped out of the race. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri, Aug 19 2011, 8:57 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
Seems that the zoning officer is not removing the way out of date signs. Hows about he gets that trash out of public view. Its bad enough we have to see it defacing our historic character during election time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri, Aug 19 2011, 9:15 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
Its rather nice and unique that we actually have a candidate from Cranbury running for the State Assembly. No matter which party you support you should at least think about supporting the local guy Wayne Wittman. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri, Aug 19 2011, 11:23 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
Your link does not work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Aug 20 2011, 6:58 am EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
this will work
http://www.capitolpromotions.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Aug 20 2011, 5:48 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
People always throw this up. First, as a dem in 2009 the tea party was not what it is now. The original idea was good, but it became hostage to the hard right soon after.
Second I want Cranbury's interests looked after. The only way this happens is having someone from here being in the state assembly. We have seen enough of Cranbury missing out or being penalized. There comes a time when even the hard core right and left have to look out for the overall interests of the town and not petty politics. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Aug 20 2011, 7:18 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
Guest wrote: | People always throw this up. First, as a dem in 2009 the tea party was not what it is now. The original idea was good, but it became hostage to the hard right soon after.
Second I want Cranbury's interests looked after. The only way this happens is having someone from here being in the state assembly. We have seen enough of Cranbury missing out or being penalized. There comes a time when even the hard core right and left have to look out for the overall interests of the town and not petty politics. |
Nonsense! Having a tea party republican (who happens to live in Cranbury) join state government with teapublican Christie gives us NADA |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Aug 20 2011, 9:26 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
You're right it won't help us fight things like cOah just like Linda did. It won't get us the grant money for road projects like Linda did. Oh wait we got no grant money for roads and Linda didn't do anything to help us on coah and Wayne Deangelo ignored us all together.
You are putting your party view above the town. That's fine just don't make it seem we won't be helped. I would hope the reps would vote for a Cranbury dem as well if they were running. Show where Wayne is part if today's tea party group.
As I said in 2009 I was at the inn and thought the tea party was not hard right, but represented all of us who wanted to watch spending. It since went downhill fast. So my one attendance would make me a tea party member even though I disagree with them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Aug 20 2011, 11:13 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
Guest wrote: | Guest wrote: | People always throw this up. First, as a dem in 2009 the tea party was not what it is now. The original idea was good, but it became hostage to the hard right soon after.
Second I want Cranbury's interests looked after. The only way this happens is having someone from here being in the state assembly. We have seen enough of Cranbury missing out or being penalized. There comes a time when even the hard core right and left have to look out for the overall interests of the town and not petty politics. |
Nonsense! Having a tea party republican (who happens to live in Cranbury) join state government with teapublican Christie gives us NADA |
How do you know you Wittman is a "tea party Republican"? Certainly not on the basis of this 2 year old post. I remember someone here made the same claim about Dan Mulligan, who was the "Cranbury Conservative" yet he and Jay are now both being shunned by the Township Republican org for being too moderate and centralist and they have voted in concert with the Dems on the Township Committee often.
Besides, I abhor more things about what the Tea Party is now but that includes the simpleton politics of making everything us versus them on the basis of labels rather than the facts of the issues. Yet it seems like that is exactly what you are doing here. Which makes you just a different stripe of tea partier. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
publius Guest
|
Posted: Mon, Aug 22 2011, 10:59 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Isn't it a little early for all the political signs in Cranbury |
|
|
Please.
I hope that just because you call yourself a Republican, doesn't mean that you have to fall into bed with the national party line of pinheads, morons and idiots that they now represent.
Try to be independent and think for yourselves for a change.
Democrats tend to be inept.
But, the gop, at least. at the national level, are REALLY scraping the bottom of the barrel for federal offices right now.
It's SO laughable that this is the best that they can come up with.
Romney is the only one that has a tinker's cuss of a chance, but, he is ignored because he is NOT whacky enough!
At the local level, parties shouldn't really matter all that much.
All of that kooky-talk is just for raising money anyway.
You don't need much money to run for township political office, so why bother. Just make decisions based on whats good for the community and don't worry about predigested ideology. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|