| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
anon-1p03
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat, Sep 7 2019, 11:14 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
 |
|
| anon-8sp4 wrote: | ........except for those who disagree with us.
Obama built the cages, inconvenient Historical fact isn't it. Thinkspeak has taken over your mind 1984 |
No immigrant children died in custody while Obama was President. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
???????-3470
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Sep 8 2019, 6:50 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| how does the previous poster know what Obama did?or didn"t do? because he said so?why would a politician lie? why don't you worry about starving and homeless chidren that are born and live in the USA. know body is forcing the illegals to come to America but we dont care about the ones that were born here and cant get a hand out for food or housing. im sure the usa born wouldnt mind the conditions the immigrants are receiving. some in the backwoods and streets of this country deserve the attention immigrants receive. thats right i almost forgot it has tobe something against Trump before we fight for it. Maybe t\Trump should show interest and then the rest of the country would fight for helping them or bashing them but at least attention would be brought to starving and homeless AMERICANS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-qn09
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Sep 8 2019, 11:36 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| dude these aren't "illegals" these are folks applying for asylum. That is not illegal. They are following US law and there children are being penned like animals. Since you care s much about legality,you should be incensed that the administration has broken court orders of how long children should be separated. What that doesn't bother you? Then you don't care about legality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-2394
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Sep 9 2019, 12:48 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-8sp4
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Sep 9 2019, 5:31 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| Look at conditions in Democratic controlled cities like Baltimore and Newark. Children from those areas would be in better conditions at the Border holding points under this Republican Administration. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-qn09
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Sep 11 2019, 5:14 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| anon-2394 wrote: | If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw |
not True after you claim asylum at the checkpoint while the process the claim you are put into a camp |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-9005
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Sep 11 2019, 9:19 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| anon-qn09 wrote: | | anon-2394 wrote: | If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw |
not True after you claim asylum at the checkpoint while the process the claim you are put into a camp |
America replaced slavery with illegal immigration... cheap laborers with no rights brought in to pick the crops and serve the masters.
Consider that when you advocate for continued ILLEGAL immigration.
If you want to help the poor people of Central America, pressure congress to enact a better LEGAL immigration system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Sep 11 2019, 11:06 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| anon-2394 wrote: | If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw |
yup and when the claim asylum legally and then they are put in detention. Legal asylum seekers are being put in detention. If you deny this you are either an idiot or a liar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-q2r7
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Sep 12 2019, 5:43 am EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | anon-2394 wrote: | If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw |
yup and when the claim asylum legally and then they are put in detention. Legal asylum seekers are being put in detention. If you deny this you are either an idiot or a liar. |
So what you are saying is they enter this country illegally, get caught and claim asylum, and are put in a detention center where they belong. What is the problem? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-8991
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Sep 12 2019, 7:05 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| anon-8sp4 wrote: | | Look at conditions in Democratic controlled cities like Baltimore and Newark. Children from those areas would be in better conditions at the Border holding points under this Republican Administration. |
Good one Trumpy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-8991
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-5037
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu, Sep 12 2019, 8:57 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
Good article in the Cranbury Press about the Indivisible Group protesting on 9/11. Link below.
I am not sure I understand why 9/11. No one explains that to any degree. I understand the issue and asking the leaders of our country to be more humane. I like the You know You’re from Cranbury FB page. That page is about unity and community. Why can’t we do better as a town as that page shows we are capable. why can’t we respect our township neighbors and come together like last night and as we see on that page? I saw some of our TC stand with first responders and people of the Rep and Dem parties come together last night. We are capable so why do we need to bring hate and national views to town the rest of the time whether a tea Party or Indivisible. Why can’t we let those issues stay out of town. We see our neighbors while we walk down the street shouldn’t we realize they aren’t the issue. None of us has the funds or influence to change national politics and we don’t have the votes either. So why let those issues we cannot change, make our town so divided.
http://www.centraljersey.com/news/the_cranbury_press/date-of-rally-sparks-a-debate-in-cranbury/article_d7a35010-109c-5ac3-8026-ed1d242e0315.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-qn09
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 12:33 am EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| anon-q2r7 wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | anon-2394 wrote: | If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw |
yup and when the claim asylum legally and then they are put in detention. Legal asylum seekers are being put in detention. If you deny this you are either an idiot or a liar. |
So what you are saying is they enter this country illegally, get caught and claim asylum, and are put in a detention center where they belong. What is the problem? |
Apparently English is not your native language, read it again. The apply for asylum legally and are then put in camps. Since you are such a legal stickler, realize that the Trump administration was told by the court to no longer separate young children yet they continue to do so. That is illegal. I await your call to have these officials put into camps because of their illegal acts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-q2r7
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 6:14 am EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| Where do you get your info from CNN? Ever herd of the Flores agreement? Nothing is illegal and no officials will be put in camps, only ILLEGAL immigrants. By the way may english is fine, but judging by your post you need some work on your grammar. Lastly why do you resort to name calling? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-572n
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 9:16 am EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| anon-qn09 wrote: | | anon-q2r7 wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | anon-2394 wrote: | If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw |
yup and when the claim asylum legally and then they are put in detention. Legal asylum seekers are being put in detention. If you deny this you are either an idiot or a liar. |
So what you are saying is they enter this country illegally, get caught and claim asylum, and are put in a detention center where they belong. What is the problem? |
Apparently English is not your native language, read it again. The apply for asylum legally and are then put in camps. Since you are such a legal stickler, realize that the Trump administration was told by the court to no longer separate young children yet they continue to do so. That is illegal. I await your call to have these officials put into camps because of their illegal acts. |
I'm not being a troll, I'm asking sincerely. What do you suggest they do with the tens of thousands of people who came seeking asylum? Get them all rooms at the holiday inn? If 30,000 people showed up at your front door, what would you do with them, regardless of whether you believed they had the right to be there or not.
I am a Democrat, and I believe people have the right to seek asylum. I do not believe that everybody should get it just because they asked, I believe that there needs to be guidelines and protocols. I agree that the camp situation is a million miles from ideal.
But the only steps I see being taken by Indivisible is to camp out in front of government buildings screeching "Stop the hate!" And if you point out that there is a huge difference between "Hate" and "Logistical nightmare of housing unprecedented numbers of people showing up seeking asylum" you get shouted down. What is YOUR proposed solution, Dr. Zurfluh? Lead with that instead of your Indivisible approved talking points. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-572n
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 9:33 am EDT Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury |
|
|
| And please don't say "Open borders" because that is just lunacy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
