Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing

Post a reply

Username

Subject

Message body

Emoticons

Font colour: Font size:

Close Tags

[quote="Guest"][quote="Guest"][quote="Guest"][quote="Guest"][quote="guest 3"]Anyone who has followed this issue from the beginning would know that this issue is not just about buses.  The real issue is that the school administration is making major decisions without doing the proper research.  In order to save face, the administration has flip-flopped on the reason for changing the stops, first it was to save time and money, and lastly for safety reasons.  Regardless of the real reason, they continue scramble to find facts to justify their most recent position.  And that my friends is the real problem.....it's not a "bus"problem, it's and administration problem.   Keep digging, I am sure you will find more than meets the eye with many issues........[/quote]
     It sounds so movie like. A conspiracy you infer ?  What is the reason? Money, power, a pay off?  Who is controlling the board? The Mafia?  There are many questions that need to be answered,  LOL
     I think you need to remember that this is just a bus stop change and not the end of the world. Little Johnny and little suzie will get to school just fine. If you cannot bear to stand on OTR waiting for the bus then drive like everyone else. Boo Hoo that you must walk 50 extra feet in the morning, Boo Hoo. Many people don't get busing and always have to walk or drive their children.[/quote]

Not implying a conspiracy.  Again the issue is not just about changing a bus stop/route.  Clearly you haven't dealt with the administration directly or attended a board meeting on any matter.  If you had you would be more informed rather than just posting opinions on a matter you don't know anything about.  Stop implying parents don't want to walk an extra 50ft, that is not the issue AT ALL. Get the details then make an informed post.[/quote]

You keep saying that but you realize that makes no sense, right?  You keep saying the issue is NOT about the bus stop but about "dealing with the administration" and the way it makes unilateral decisions and communicates.  But of course it is about the bus stop.  Otherwise you are suggesting that all this fuss and showing up in force at the school board meeting and the letters to the paper, etc. is nothing more than the protest the principle of their decision and not the result.  That's BS.  The letter, the speakers at the meeting, etc. all were specifically interested in changing the bus route back, not just in complaining about how the school went about the decision.

So those of us not agreeing with you are not simply "uninformed" as you would like to believe.  We simply aren't falling for your logic that this isn't about the actual bus stop.  Of course it is.  Whether the school acted poorly or not, the end result is some people want the route reverted and some people don’t see why it should be.[/quote]

"uninformed" because your only source of information on this matter is this blog and the Cranbury Press.  I never said you had to agree with the parent's position however, you shouldn't imply they are whining and complaining about walking an extra 50ft.   Their position is based on far many more facts and data then what has been posted here or in the Cranbury Press.[/quote]

Options
HTML is ON
BBCode is ON
Smilies are ON

	Disable HTML in this post
	Disable BBCode in this post
	Disable Smilies in this post