Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing

Post a reply

Username

Subject

Message body

Emoticons

Font colour: Font size:

Close Tags

[quote="Guest"][quote="Guest"][quote]In order to erase the need for the 2-cent increase, $320,000 would have to be cut from our proposed budget. [/quote]

If we have $1.9 million of the surplus available to use, why can't we use $320,000 of it for the budget and not raise the taxes?

[quote]In every projection we did, regardless of the budget assumptions and replenishment rates, the surplus disappeared in approximately four years. [/quote]

Maybe the budget assumptions and replenishment rates could be posted.  How did you come up with the replenishment rates?  I don't understand how the surplus disappears in 4 years if you use $320,000 this year.  Are you assuming you use the same amount or more for the following three years with no replenishment?

The letter/post from Glenn makes it sound like it is service cuts vs. tax increase.  Win wants to use the surplus vs tax increase.[/quote]

As has been posted previously, the Mayor would have us use 2.0 million.  The TC proposal in the budget introduced uses 1.7 million of the 1.9 million to offset the tax increase.

There is no scenario where the majority of the surplus is not tapped this year.[/quote]

Options
HTML is ON
BBCode is ON
Smilies are ON

	Disable HTML in this post
	Disable BBCode in this post
	Disable Smilies in this post