Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="observer"]Mr. Moody here's what I've read from the various posts. First you said no one has offered any reason to you for why the sirens are maintained. Then when multiple people contradicted you on that based on past facts, you restated that you have been given no reason you deem worthy. Since you’re basically saying your subjective opinion differs from others in the Township, what exactly are you expecting? That if you are noisily and persistent enough (ironic given your complaint) others will bend to your opinion? Even if that’s the case, why pretend to be “reasonable” and say your open to hearing the reasons if you already have and have rejected them? It seems like you are ironclad in your opinion and aren’t open to changing it, so don’t undermine your credibility by pretending you’re just waiting for a reasonable discussion. More likely you are trying to find opportunities to debate with anyone who tries. Putting all the various other reasons aside, what I’ve read here is that we have a 100% volunteer fire department with no full-time professionals and that our department is smaller in personnel than most if not all of the other Township’s you mentioned. You also seem to have cherry-picked your examples since there are other Township’s that still use a siren. At least one of the volunteers who relies on the siren commented here that they may not hear or feel the vibration of their phone sometimes. I’m not a volunteer fire fighter but I have definitely missed calls and texts when I didn’t hear, didn’t feel the vibration or was simply out of range (despite being at my house which usually is in range – cellular service is not consistent or perfect, and no one with a straight face could suggest otherwise). So if we have a very thin base of volunteers who might be available to respond to a call at any given time, why would we risk safety or property damage by denying ourselves every opportunity to make sure they get the call right away? The system has worked for decades, it is preferred by the people volunteering and it is acceptable by most of the residents. Or perhaps your lack of empathy comes from not actually owning a property in the Township. I guess it's not your problem. You may not like the reason, as you are inclined to like no reason that doesn’t result in your personal desire, but that’s not the same as it not being valid. The fact that you continue to repeat the same assaults, pretending your questions haven’t been asked and answered multiple times, and freely throw insults at people along the way, frankly makes you a bully. I suspect possibly a narcissist too, but I’ll reserve judgment. And this isn’t about suppressing your free speech, which you have continued to exercise here, at meetings and in the papers. This is about calling it out for what it is – bullying and self-obsession. You clearly only think about yourself and are baffled that anyone else wouldn’t inherently agree with you. Good luck with that and a happy holiday to you.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
anon-15q1
Posted: Tue, Jun 18 2013, 4:40 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I just look at it like this, if it were my house burning down I would want the fire company there as fast as possible, and if it were a family or friend dying I would want the first aid just as fast.
anon-240q
Posted: Tue, Jun 18 2013, 4:29 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I like the sirens, but then again I don't live right next to them.
JB
Posted: Thu, Jan 12 2012, 9:31 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Sorry but Plainsboro, and West Windsor still use them, the old air raid style like we used to have. Jamesburg also has sirens.
B Rogers
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 3:53 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
You're being silly.
I am most definitely not Richard Moody. I have lived in Cranbury for fourteen years and my daughter is an EMT with Cranbury First Aid Squad. She responds to calls using one of the pagers that the squad issues to all members. The pagers work fine.
no mas means no more
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 3:14 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
no mas wrote:
And......on it goes.
Yes, by virtue of your post....
no mas
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 2:50 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
Richard Moody wrote:
LOLguest wrote:
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Mr. Moody, if you're going to post under another name to make it look like you have support for your position you should try harder next time to use a language and style that isn't so easily identified as your signature, such as your unique use of the phrase "noise pollution." Nice try, but do better. It also undermines your supposed credibility as not posting anonymously though I can understand the urge to try and make it look like you have some support.
I am not B. Rogers who at least has the guts to reveal his name. Perhaps you'd be bold enough to reveal who you are?
And......on it goes.
Richard Moody
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 2:23 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
LOLguest wrote:
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Mr. Moody, if you're going to post under another name to make it look like you have support for your position you should try harder next time to use a language and style that isn't so easily identified as your signature, such as your unique use of the phrase "noise pollution." Nice try, but do better. It also undermines your supposed credibility as not posting anonymously though I can understand the urge to try and make it look like you have some support.
I am not B. Rogers who at least has the guts to reveal his name. Perhaps you'd be bold enough to reveal who you are?
LOLguest
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 8:42 am EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Mr. Moody, if you're going to post under another name to make it look like you have support for your position you should try harder next time to use a language and style that isn't so easily identified as your signature, such as your unique use of the phrase "noise pollution." Nice try, but do better. It also undermines your supposed credibility as not posting anonymously though I can understand the urge to try and make it look like you have some support.
Sirens stay
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 8:31 am EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I spoke with a majority of the TC and their statement to me is they have discussed and the siren stays. That they feel public safety officials are best to determine the needs and means of response. So this topic should die.
no mas
Posted: Wed, Jan 4 2012, 11:19 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Aaaah, the topic that will not die.
B Rogers
Posted: Wed, Jan 4 2012, 11:00 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Mr. Nuhbuddie
Posted: Mon, Dec 26 2011, 6:27 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
Leftwing townsfolk....... wrote:
I was interested in moving to this town until a few friends of mine told me to read this forum, and they were 100% correct when they told me that there were too many liberals in this town that lack common sense. Any town where the residents get upset over police, fire, and ambulance sirens to the point where they want to silence them is way too far to the left for me and my family to purchase a home there! As a resident of any town, I most certainly would want the EMERGENCY SERVICE responders to make as much noise as possible so any children would have ample warning to get out of the way, and also any elderly who may be behind on the audio scale! My father always said, the liberals will legislate and tax themselves out of their own homes if you give them enough room to do so!
PS: You can keep the excess supply of homes all to yourselves!
What a phony note!
guest13
Posted: Sun, Dec 25 2011, 12:01 am EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I don't think Mr. Right Wing Out of Towner is a real person, just that same kid who loves to post things they know will provoke responses from people.
But if it's a real person, no loss. Most of the people in this town, right or left leaning politically, are smarter than to orient their entire lives around defining others as right/left or conservative/liberal. Most of us know and are friends with people in both parties. Cranbury takes all kinds, but if you're going to go around hating on people based on a label, please live elsewhere.
aResident
Posted: Sat, Dec 24 2011, 11:38 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
Einstein has spoken wrote:
4000+ people in this town, and Einstein is able to generalize all of them through a small number of anonymous postings. Brilliant.
This guy is no Einstein. I don't care if s/he moves in or not.
Einstein has spoken
Posted: Sat, Dec 24 2011, 11:10 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
4000+ people in this town, and Einstein is able to generalize all of them through a small number of anonymous postings. Brilliant.
guestagain
Posted: Sat, Dec 24 2011, 11:05 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
Leftwing townsfolk....... wrote:
I was interested in moving to this town until a few friends of mine told me to read this forum, and they were 100% correct when they told me that there were too many liberals in this town that lack common sense. Any town where the residents get upset over police, fire, and ambulance sirens to the point where they want to silence them is way too far to the left for me and my family to purchase a home there! As a resident of any town, I most certainly would want the EMERGENCY SERVICE responders to make as much noise as possible so any children would have ample warning to get out of the way, and also any elderly who may be behind on the audio scale! My father always said, the liberals will legislate and tax themselves out of their own homes if you give them enough room to do so!
PS: You can keep the excess supply of homes all to yourselves!
funny, I thought the people complaining about everything on this board were right wing zealots. Glad another one isn't moving in.