Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="news"][b] Officials do not feel plan is in best interest of public[/b] Local mayors say forced consolidation is a bad idea. They say legislation currently being considered that would remove local voters from the consolidation process and leave the decision up to the state will be costly and not in the best interests of their constituents. "We would be absolutely, totally opposed to any decision in which the citizens of Monroe, and in our case, the town of Jamesburg — where citizens in both towns would not be in agreement," Monroe Mayor Richard Pucci said Wednesday. The Joint Legislative Committee on Consolidation and Shared Services reviewed several bills Wednesday — including bills AJR69, sponsored by Assemblyman Kevin O'Toole, R-Bergen, Essex and Passaic, and Assemblywoman Jennifer Beck, R-Mercer and Monmouth, and SJR47 sponsored by Sens. Joseph Kyrillos Jr., R-Middlesex and Monmouth, and Stephen Sweeney, D-Salem, Cumberland and Gloucester, — that would create a panel resembling the federal military base-closing commission to decide which of the state's 566 towns should be merged. The panel's recommendations would be sent to the Legislature and governor, who would then vote on the list. The towns would then be forced to consolidate without having an opportunity to vote on the mergers directly. The committee was created as part of a joint legislative session that kicked off in July. Other committees are looking at state school funding, pension and benefits, the state constitution and a possible property tax convention. ... ([url=http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=17294289&BRD=1091&PAG=461&dept_id=425419&rfi=6]more[/url])[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
news
Posted: Sat, Oct 7 2006, 5:03 pm EDT
Post subject: Mayors pan merger bill
Officials do not feel plan is in best interest of public
Local mayors say forced consolidation is a bad idea.
They say legislation currently being considered that would remove local voters from the consolidation process and leave the decision up to the state will be costly and not in the best interests of their constituents.
"We would be absolutely, totally opposed to any decision in which the citizens of Monroe, and in our case, the town of Jamesburg — where citizens in both towns would not be in agreement," Monroe Mayor Richard Pucci said Wednesday.
The Joint Legislative Committee on Consolidation and Shared Services reviewed several bills Wednesday — including bills AJR69, sponsored by Assemblyman Kevin O'Toole, R-Bergen, Essex and Passaic, and Assemblywoman Jennifer Beck, R-Mercer and Monmouth, and SJR47 sponsored by Sens. Joseph Kyrillos Jr., R-Middlesex and Monmouth, and Stephen Sweeney, D-Salem, Cumberland and Gloucester, — that would create a panel resembling the federal military base-closing commission to decide which of the state's 566 towns should be merged. The panel's recommendations would be sent to the Legislature and governor, who would then vote on the list. The towns would then be forced to consolidate without having an opportunity to vote on the mergers directly.
The committee was created as part of a joint legislative session that kicked off in July. Other committees are looking at state school funding, pension and benefits, the state constitution and a possible property tax convention.
...
(
more
)