Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
Home Sweet Home
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Guest"]Every year Money intentionally changes the criteria of their list so you can never compare year-over-year and it always represents a fairly narrow segment of municipalities. This year the criteria is towns/cities with at least 50,000 people and not more than 250,000. It is interesting that a bunch of the larger towns around us made the list. And I don't know many people who would choose to live in them over a place like Cranbury or even Plainsboro, West Windsor or South Brunswick. Even the two Princeton's were too small for eligibility. It's ironic, in fact, that Hamilton and Edison made the list when the supporters of COAH have listed them as places hurt by the previous RCA and COAH policies.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="100%" class="forumline"> <tr> <th class="thCornerL" width="22%" height="26">Author</th> <th class="thCornerR">Message</th> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Mon, Jul 14 2008, 9:00 am EDT<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Money Magazine: 100 Best Places to Live (2008)</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">Every year Money intentionally changes the criteria of their list so you can never compare year-over-year and it always represents a fairly narrow segment of municipalities. This year the criteria is towns/cities with at least 50,000 people and not more than 250,000. It is interesting that a bunch of the larger towns around us made the list. And I don't know many people who would choose to live in them over a place like Cranbury or even Plainsboro, West Windsor or South Brunswick. Even the two Princeton's were too small for eligibility. It's ironic, in fact, that Hamilton and Edison made the list when the supporters of COAH have listed them as places hurt by the previous RCA and COAH policies.</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row2"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row2" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Mon, Jul 14 2008, 8:26 am EDT<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Money Magazine: 100 Best Places to Live (2008)</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">Money Magazine: 100 Best Places to Live (2008): <br /> <br /><a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/2008/snapshots/PL2751730.html" target="_blank">http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/2008/snapshots/PL2751730.html</a> <br /> <br />Full list: <br /> <br /><a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/2008/top100/" target="_blank">http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/2008/top100/</a></span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> </table>
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in