Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Guest"][quote="Guest"][quote="Guest Z"]Note that this plan would require the funds be put in "Special Issue" US Government bonds. Think Social Security "Lockbox". This is another insane Democrat idea to funnel more and more of our money into their hands. If you never felt you had a reason to vote Republican you've got one now! Keep this Congress out of our pockets.[/quote] You said "to funnel more and more of our money into their hands." Does the "Lockbox" belong to only Democrats?[/quote] For the most part yes. Most famously it was Al Gore that tried to perpetrate this fiction on us. The point is that this Democrat controlloed Congress is actually talking about taking citizen's real assets from their 401K and replacing them with paper IOUs. If you doubt that they would spend it and then rely on future taxes to pay them I have a bridge I would like to sell you. I have no doubt that IRAs would follow if they get away with the 401 scam. It is easy to see why this is the lowest rated Congress in history.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Sun, Oct 26 2008, 4:36 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: They can't fix Social Security, so now they're looking at this...
Guest wrote:
Guest Z wrote:
Note that this plan would require the funds be put in "Special Issue" US Government bonds. Think Social Security "Lockbox". This is another insane Democrat idea to funnel more and more of our money into their hands. If you never felt you had a reason to vote Republican you've got one now! Keep this Congress out of our pockets.
You said "to funnel more and more of our money into their hands."
Does the "Lockbox" belong to only Democrats?
For the most part yes. Most famously it was Al Gore that tried to perpetrate this fiction on us. The point is that this Democrat controlloed Congress is actually talking about taking citizen's real assets from their 401K and replacing them with paper IOUs. If you doubt that they would spend it and then rely on future taxes to pay them I have a bridge I would like to sell you. I have no doubt that IRAs would follow if they get away with the 401 scam. It is easy to see why this is the lowest rated Congress in history.
Guest
Posted: Sun, Oct 26 2008, 2:36 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: They can't fix Social Security, so now they're looking at this...
Savings mechanisms are offered now. People should take personal responsibility to use them. There is no excuse for people not saving for retirement. Personally, I don't want the government handling my retirement money. All of our retirement planning is done without counting on Social Security, which is just supposed to be supplemental anyway.
Guest
Posted: Sun, Oct 26 2008, 2:21 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: They can't fix Social Security, so now they're looking at this...
You do understand that if the money is in government bonds then it is money that is in essence lent to the U.S. government and they're crediting you for the use of the money by paying 3%. To think your money will simply sit in an account is a bit unrealistic.
Why can't they modify the current system and allow owned accounts? Why do we have to sacrifice more money? We'd be paying 11.7% to SS. If they want to make it so it is either 401K or this if you don't have a 401K option then it makes sense to me to do so in order to offer a savings mechanism.
Guest
Posted: Sun, Oct 26 2008, 10:51 am EDT
Post subject: Re: They can't fix Social Security, so now they're looking at this...
Guest Z wrote:
Note that this plan would require the funds be put in "Special Issue" US Government bonds. Think Social Security "Lockbox". This is another insane Democrat idea to funnel more and more of our money into their hands. If you never felt you had a reason to vote Republican you've got one now! Keep this Congress out of our pockets.
You said "to funnel more and more of our money into their hands."
Does the "Lockbox" belong to only Democrats?
Guest Z
Posted: Sun, Oct 26 2008, 8:57 am EDT
Post subject: Re: They can't fix Social Security, so now they're looking at this...
Note that this plan would require the funds be put in "Special Issue" US Government bonds. Think Social Security "Lockbox". This is another insane Democrat idea to funnel more and more of our money into their hands. If you never felt you had a reason to vote Republican you've got one now! Keep this Congress out of our pockets.
Guest
Posted: Sat, Oct 25 2008, 4:56 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: They can't fix Social Security, so now they're looking at this...
Here is a key note:
Under Ghilarducci’s plan, all workers would receive a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government but would be required to invest 5 percent of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account administered by the Social Security Administration. The money in turn would be invested in special government bonds that would pay 3 percent a year, adjusted for inflation.
Why can't they simply use our SS contributions for this purpose instead? I like having a choice and 3% is not going to help me retire.
I'd prefer they make 5% contributions to a 401K mandatory. In fact a lot of employers are making it mandatory that employees contribute by setting up automatic enrollment.
Unbelievable!
Posted: Sat, Oct 25 2008, 4:45 pm EDT
Post subject: They can't fix Social Security, so now they're looking at this...
October 16, 2008
House Democrats Contemplate Abolishing 401(k) Tax Breaks
Powerful House Democrats are eyeing proposals to overhaul the nation’s $3 trillion 401(k) system, including the elimination of most of the $80 billion in annual tax breaks that 401(k) investors receive.
House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-California, and Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Washington, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee’s Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support, are looking at redirecting those tax breaks to a new system of guaranteed retirement accounts to which all workers would be obliged to contribute.
http://www.workforce.com/section/00/article/25/83/58.php