Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Jay T.
Posted: Wed, Jan 14 2009, 8:01 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cozine State of the State Speech: COAH Statement...
Admittedly, I have not done a lot of reading into the statements. However, like Mr. Kean it struck me as odd that at this time of economic worry and high property tax that Corzine would make the statement he made. I am in full agreement on halting the builders fee, however, that is tied in with the town's obligations to provide for COAH housing. Stopping the fee without halting the building increases property taxes to a greater extent.
wcody
Posted: Wed, Jan 14 2009, 7:55 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cozine State of the State Speech: COAH Statement...
January 13, 2009
Contact: John Gorman / (609) 292-5199
Senator Sean T. Kean (R-11) Kean Offers to Rework Corzine COAH Proposal
Reacting to Governor Corzine’s call for a one-year moratorium on the 2.5% developer’s COAH fee during his State of the State address, Senator Sean Kean (R-11) issued the following statement:
“Republicans have been saying since June that the non-residential fee on commercial developers is an onerous tax that will deter business growth in the state. While a moratorium may temporarily stop the damage he is doing to our business community, taking away the only source of funding set aside to help municipalities meet their COAH obligations will make matters worse. I urge the Governor to go one step further and place a moratorium on implementation of the current COAH rules. This will give the Legislature the time necessary to correct the flaws in the law and produce a commonsense plan that doesn’t place unreasonable burdens on our municipalities and residents.
“As it stands, COAH is an unfunded mandate that will lead to higher property taxes, kill job creation, and drive our residents out of state. The Governor should take the opportunity to reevaluate this proposal because it will have a crippling impact on our communities for decades to come. We can no longer saddle future generations with these type of financially misguided policies. Republicans stand ready to work with Governor Jon Corzine and Department of Community Affairs Commissioner Joseph Doria in reworking this program to better fit the needs of our towns and New Jersey’s taxpayers.”
Link to Post:
http://www.senatenj.com/index.php/seankean/kean-offers-to-rework-corzine-coah-proposal/2064
Cranbury Conservative
Posted: Tue, Jan 13 2009, 2:39 pm EST
Post subject: Cozine State of the State Speech: COAH Statement...
In his State of the State speech today Governor Corzine stated the following....
“I am calling today for a one-year moratorium on the 2.5 percent developer’s COAH fee, while additionally exempting projects that were in the pipeline before the fee was instituted.”
Obviously this is an incomplete statement since stopping the funding would mean that all COAH mandates would have to be potentially suspended as well.
We will have to wait and see how this plays out.