Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Guest"][quote="Guest"]And school budgets?[/quote] Yes, and school budgets. We have 3 kids there and voted no on principle because they shouldn't have spent a dime on new "smart boards" etc. But in fairness, a vast majority of the expense was out of their control -- union contracts, required infrastructure repairs, etc. Which only reinforces the point about new new projects. It's never just a one-time expense.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2009, 9:20 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
We use them at work as well. The 40K in training I think is over kill. I work for a Fortune 500 company and training can be a large cost. So there are champions assigned who go to training and then teach the office. Why did we have to send a large group of teachers as opposed to simply having one or two go and then train the teachers at an in service day or right before school starts. The teachers wouldn't have had to travel and the school would have saved money.
Guest
Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2009, 9:14 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
Guest wrote:
If you go and look at the BOE meeting notes the expense of training is over 40,000 for the teachers on how to use the smart board. I can't seem to help thinking that they should try and figure it out first before there is training. Plus they are sending Phys Ed teachers to training which to me seems a bit unnnecessary.
I don't have anything against the smart board slong term but it is an example of an elective expense in a tight economic time. My kids have been in classes that use them and it hasn't fundamentally improved their education. We use them at work too -- I had to show the teacher how to get it to work during the parent night. So I know what their capable of and its nice. Just not essential.
Guest
Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2009, 7:55 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
If you go and look at the BOE meeting notes the expense of training is over 40,000 for the teachers on how to use the smart board. I can't seem to help thinking that they should try and figure it out first before there is training. Plus they are sending Phys Ed teachers to training which to me seems a bit unnnecessary.
Guest
Posted: Sat, Jul 25 2009, 10:55 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
Doesn't it cost less to buy land than the impact of additional development?
Guest
Posted: Sat, Jul 25 2009, 9:19 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
Guest wrote:
And school budgets?
Yes, and school budgets. We have 3 kids there and voted no on principle because they shouldn't have spent a dime on new "smart boards" etc.
But in fairness, a vast majority of the expense was out of their control -- union contracts, required infrastructure repairs, etc. Which only reinforces the point about new new projects. It's never just a one-time expense.
Guest
Posted: Sat, Jul 25 2009, 8:52 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
And school budgets?
Guest
Posted: Sat, Jul 25 2009, 8:25 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
We need to stop the spending now. Baseball fields, Library, its all too much.
publius
Posted: Thu, Jul 23 2009, 1:28 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
Better buy now! They're not making land the way they used to!
Jay T
Posted: Thu, Jul 23 2009, 8:16 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
I think we should look at preservation whenever we have the opportunity. At the same time, we do need to place some restrictions on the approach the TC takes in making their review.
1) We need to look for grant money to make any preservation acquisition. I am opposed to dipping right into our open space funds or other means of town funding without first exhausting all of the potential grant opportunities.
2) If we do not get grants and if the purchase can be made by using open space funds then it needs to be seriously considered for both pros and cons on that specific property and residents should be allowed to comment.
3) If the acquisition is such that we cannot cover the expense with open space funds then depending on the cost we need to do either a resident survey using our town's website or if it is over 1 million dollars a full referendum.
No matter what the approach the TC takes we have to make sure the town residents are involved in the process and are aware of the positive and negative impact of proceeding. Residents should have an equal voice whether they choose to take a stance at a meeting, vote through referendum or in an on-line poll.
Guest
Posted: Thu, Jul 23 2009, 7:55 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
Guest wrote:
So is this a want or a need?
I would rank it way above a new library or ballfield... But still a want.
Guest
Posted: Thu, Jul 23 2009, 7:46 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
So is this a want or a need?
Guest
Posted: Thu, Jul 23 2009, 7:39 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
In addition to the negative economic impact of residential development, COAH rules have turned commercial development into a financial drain in the long term. All the more reason to support farmland preservation.
Guest
Posted: Wed, Jul 22 2009, 4:31 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Farmland preservation
No doubt that it is a bad fiscal climate.
However, since the 1950s patterns of development have not been optimal fiscally or environmentally. Land preservation is a good investment. Missing the opportunity to do so now (irrespective of the fact that real estate values are depressed) would not make sense. If the opportunity is missed and land is developed, the decision not to do so becomes irreversible.
Guest
Posted: Wed, Jul 22 2009, 4:09 pm EDT
Post subject: Farmland preservation
Just wondering how people feel about the town spending money on
open space at this time...