Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="guests"]If part of the Private Duty Service @ $60. per hour per police officer is mandated by the state it is just one more reason why we are in such bad financial straights. I'd love to know the logic of the township committee members in increasing the already exorbitant rate. The traffic directing duty for these construction jobs like old trenton road and plainsboro road can easily, and more professionaly be done by private contractors for considerably less. Its too bad we are coerced into having this burden placed on both the contractors and the township. Just one more reason to leave N. J.![/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="100%" class="forumline"> <tr> <th class="thCornerL" width="22%" height="26">Author</th> <th class="thCornerR">Message</th> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Mon, Dec 27 2010, 10:22 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody"></span><table width="90%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" border="0" align="center"><tr> <td><span class="genmed"><b>Guest wrote:</b></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="quote"></span><table width="90%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" border="0" align="center"><tr> <td><span class="genmed"><b>guest 4 wrote:</b></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="quote">If the police officers are going to use the Cranbury Patrol cars we would hope they would set a good example and do their job in a most professional manner. For the privilege to make side money at a very good pay rate, they should not be on the cell phone, talking to each other endlessly and should get out of the patrol car and actually direct traffic. Wouldn't that be a novel idea?</td> </tr></table><span class="postbody"> <br /> <br /> I sense underlying resentment against Cranbury Police Officers. Your remarks are nasty and not constructive. As a previous poster stated when there is a police officer in a marked car, people do slow down and drive more cautiously. Most times this is why the contractor wants a police officer. I'm sure that when the officers need to direct traffic for safety purposes, they do. The idea that the officer should be constantly standing in traffic, when it is not neccesary, does not make sense.</td> </tr></table><span class="postbody"> <br /> <br />Well said</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row2"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row2" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Mon, Dec 27 2010, 6:30 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody"></span><table width="90%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" border="0" align="center"><tr> <td><span class="genmed"><b>guest 4 wrote:</b></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="quote">If the police officers are going to use the Cranbury Patrol cars we would hope they would set a good example and do their job in a most professional manner. For the privilege to make side money at a very good pay rate, they should not be on the cell phone, talking to each other endlessly and should get out of the patrol car and actually direct traffic. Wouldn't that be a novel idea?</td> </tr></table><span class="postbody"> <br /> <br /> I sense underlying resentment against Cranbury Police Officers. Your remarks are nasty and not constructive. As a previous poster stated when there is a police officer in a marked car, people do slow down and drive more cautiously. Most times this is why the contractor wants a police officer. I'm sure that when the officers need to direct traffic for safety purposes, they do. The idea that the officer should be constantly standing in traffic, when it is not neccesary, does not make sense.</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>guest 4</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Mon, Dec 27 2010, 4:22 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">If the police officers are going to use the Cranbury Patrol cars we would hope they would set a good example and do their job in a most professional manner. For the privilege to make side money at a very good pay rate, they should not be on the cell phone, talking to each other endlessly and should get out of the patrol car and actually direct traffic. Wouldn't that be a novel idea?</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row2"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row2" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Fri, Dec 24 2010, 2:46 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">Who cares, there are $0.00 tax money used. If a gas line needs to be run or electric run or sewer, then the utility company pays it. It is worked into their bid and we consumers would be charged for it regardless if a cop or an illegal alien directed the traffic. <br />I'd rather have a cop then some guy who can't speak English !</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Fri, Dec 24 2010, 11:35 am EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody"></span><table width="90%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" border="0" align="center"><tr> <td><span class="genmed"><b>guest1 wrote:</b></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="quote">Just because some other towns charge more is no reason for Cranbury to up the rates. The service being provided [directing traffic] is the same service provided by Public Service employees and other utility contractors who seem to do an excellent concientious job for the most part and it sure isn't at $60. + per hour. We need to start somewhere to try to reduce the costs and I'm sure the crossing guards would love the extra work and would certainly do a good job, remember we entrust the care of our children to them.</td> </tr></table><span class="postbody"> <br /> <br /> <br />Crossing guards, like utility/construction company day laborers(who are often undocumented aliens or ex convicts and paid under the table) are fine for some jobs.They have no authority to enforce motor vehicle law. We trust crossing guards with our children. They receive some formal training in crossing from our police officers. They have also had criminal and mental health background checks conducted by police officers. They have no training or authority to enforce motor vehicle law. At our busiest intersection not controlled by a traffic signal, School Lane, a Police Officer is still required.</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row2"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>guest1</b></span></td> <td class="row2" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Fri, Dec 24 2010, 10:05 am EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">Just because some other towns charge more is no reason for Cranbury to up the rates. The service being provided [directing traffic] is the same service provided by Public Service employees and other utility contractors who seem to do an excellent concientious job for the most part and it sure isn't at $60. + per hour. We need to start somewhere to try to reduce the costs and I'm sure the crossing guards would love the extra work and would certainly do a good job, remember we entrust the care of our children to them.</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Fri, Dec 24 2010, 12:22 am EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">$60.00 an hour is not mandated by the state. It is done per town. Monroe and South Brunswick both charge more. Most Middlesex towns charge more. Sworn Police Officers not private companies are the only ones who can enforce NJ title 39(Motor Vehicle Code) Do we really want private industry providing police services?</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row2"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row2" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Fri, Dec 24 2010, 12:14 am EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">Many times the contractor pays for the officer because they feel that their workers and equipment are better protected when a police officer is present. Even when the police officer is in his car on the side of the road his/her presence does cause people to slow down and use more caution. Flagmen or construction workers do not have the authority to enforce motor vehicle law. When equipment constantly needs to be moved on and off the road, having a police officer, who can lawfully stop and direct traffic, not only provides safety for workers as well as the motorists, but also allows the work to get done sooner. The fee of $60.00 an hour for police side work is about average not just in New Jersey but in many/or most other states. How much does a plumber, electrician, or appliance repair person charge an hour?</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Fri, Dec 24 2010, 12:14 am EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">Many times the contractor pays for the officer because they feel that their workers and equipment are better protected when a police officer is present. Even when the police officer is in his car on the side of the road his/her presence does cause people to slow down and use more caution. Flagmen or construction workers do not have the authority to enforce motor vehicle law. When equipment constantly needs to be moved on and off the road, having a police officer, who can lawfully stop and direct traffic, not only provides safety for workers as well as the motorists, but also allows the work to get done sooner. The fee of $60.00 an hour for police side work is about average not just in New Jersey but in many/or most other states. How much does a plumber, electrician, or appliance repair person charge an hour?</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row2"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row2" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Thu, Dec 23 2010, 8:28 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody"></span><table width="90%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" border="0" align="center"><tr> <td><span class="genmed"><b>guests wrote:</b></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="quote">The premise that the contractor pays for the "Service" and the town contribution is zero is incorrect. Each time a public road is repaired or improved the citizen taxpayers have provided that money for those repairs. The cumulative exorbitant costs i. e. [ $60. per hour for a police officer to read a newspaper or talk on a cell phone and not direct traffic] is a huge waste of tax dollars and precious resources. The contractor has no choice except to comply with the mandate and really could care less about the service provided. These mandates place a huge unnecessary burden on the taxpaying public. One other thing we need to realize is that GRANT money is not free money it is money paid by the taxpayers. Why should Cranbury taxpayers pay for goodies in New Brunswick or Woodbridge pay for goodies in Cranbury? The wasteful spending that is supposedly justified because "ITS GRANT MONEY" is ridiculous. The examples like the waste on the ballfield and the $100,000. well are prime examples of squandering GRANT MONEY. Lets hope the new committee and other municipalities as well see the light and start to really look at saving all the taxpayers some money so we can stay in N. J..</td> </tr></table><span class="postbody"> <br /> <br />Well said !</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Thu, Dec 23 2010, 6:15 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody"></span><table width="90%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" border="0" align="center"><tr> <td><span class="genmed"><b>guests wrote:</b></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="quote">The premise that the contractor pays for the "Service" and the town contribution is zero is incorrect. Each time a public road is repaired or improved the citizen taxpayers have provided that money for those repairs. The cumulative exorbitant costs i. e. [ $60. per hour for a police officer to read a newspaper or talk on a cell phone and not direct traffic] is a huge waste of tax dollars and precious resources. The contractor has no choice except to comply with the mandate and really could care less about the service provided. These mandates place a huge unnecessary burden on the taxpaying public. One other thing we need to realize is that GRANT money is not free money it is money paid by the taxpayers. Why should Cranbury taxpayers pay for goodies in New Brunswick or Woodbridge pay for goodies in Cranbury? The wasteful spending that is supposedly justified because "ITS GRANT MONEY" is ridiculous. The examples like the waste on the ballfield and the $100,000. well are prime examples of squandering GRANT MONEY. Lets hope the new committee and other municipalities as well see the light and start to really look at saving all the taxpayers some money so we can stay in N. J..</td> </tr></table><span class="postbody"> <br /> <br />The ball field is over 600k</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row2"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row2" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Thu, Dec 23 2010, 4:00 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody"></span><table width="90%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" border="0" align="center"><tr> <td><span class="genmed"><b>guests wrote:</b></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="quote">The premise that the contractor pays for the "Service" and the town contribution is zero is incorrect. Each time a public road is repaired or improved the citizen taxpayers have provided that money for those repairs. The cumulative exorbitant costs i. e. [ $60. per hour for a police officer to read a newspaper or talk on a cell phone and not direct traffic] is a huge waste of tax dollars and precious resources. The contractor has no choice except to comply with the mandate and really could care less about the service provided. These mandates place a huge unnecessary burden on the taxpaying public. One other thing we need to realize is that GRANT money is not free money it is money paid by the taxpayers. Why should Cranbury taxpayers pay for goodies in New Brunswick or Woodbridge pay for goodies in Cranbury? The wasteful spending that is supposedly justified because "ITS GRANT MONEY" is ridiculous. The examples like the waste on the ballfield and the $100,000. well are prime examples of squandering GRANT MONEY. Lets hope the new committee and other municipalities as well see the light and start to really look at saving all the taxpayers some money so we can stay in N. J..</td> </tr></table><span class="postbody"> <br /> <br />All true.</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>guests</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Thu, Dec 23 2010, 3:36 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">The premise that the contractor pays for the "Service" and the town contribution is zero is incorrect. Each time a public road is repaired or improved the citizen taxpayers have provided that money for those repairs. The cumulative exorbitant costs i. e. [ $60. per hour for a police officer to read a newspaper or talk on a cell phone and not direct traffic] is a huge waste of tax dollars and precious resources. The contractor has no choice except to comply with the mandate and really could care less about the service provided. These mandates place a huge unnecessary burden on the taxpaying public. One other thing we need to realize is that GRANT money is not free money it is money paid by the taxpayers. Why should Cranbury taxpayers pay for goodies in New Brunswick or Woodbridge pay for goodies in Cranbury? The wasteful spending that is supposedly justified because "ITS GRANT MONEY" is ridiculous. The examples like the waste on the ballfield and the $100,000. well are prime examples of squandering GRANT MONEY. Lets hope the new committee and other municipalities as well see the light and start to really look at saving all the taxpayers some money so we can stay in N. J..</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row2"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>Guest</b></span></td> <td class="row2" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Wed, Dec 22 2010, 10:49 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">zero tax dollars are used, the construction company pays the money. No tax dollars are used is my understanding.</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>guests</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Wed, Dec 22 2010, 8:51 pm EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">If part of the Private Duty Service @ $60. per hour per police officer is mandated by the state it is just one more reason why we are in such bad financial straights. I'd love to know the logic of the township committee members in increasing the already exorbitant rate. The traffic directing duty for these construction jobs like old trenton road and plainsboro road can easily, and more professionaly be done by private contractors for considerably less. Its too bad we are coerced into having this burden placed on both the contractors and the township. Just one more reason to leave N. J.!</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row2"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>quest</b></span></td> <td class="row2" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Wed, Dec 22 2010, 6:40 am EST<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Re: Dec,20 Committee Meeting Agenda--Amend "Private Duty Service"?</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">How can I get a 20% raise? It is amazing</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> </table>
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in