Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="anon-s096"]And I'd like to thank Jay for standing up and opposing this ordinance.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
anon-101-q1sq
Posted: Wed, Dec 12 2012, 10:36 pm EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
Jay used his common sense and voted No. He did not pander to a few misguided folks from Four Seasons who had no clue Cranbury ever existed before they moved here. And by the way, any of the old timers from Cranbury who have moved to Four Seasons did not endorse this ordinance nor attend the meeting. The passing of an ordinance to single out six properties[so we are told] is absurd! Just wait until those properties are sold and the new neighbor businesses move in. I'll bet the present silence of Hagerty and Cheney will be sorely missed!
anon-s096
Posted: Wed, Dec 12 2012, 7:13 am EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
And I'd like to thank Jay for standing up and opposing this ordinance.
anon-8q9r
Posted: Tue, Dec 11 2012, 5:09 pm EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
Just like I said previous I was at the meeting and I want to thank the council members who voted for this.
Yes Cook
Yes Johnson
Yes Mulligan
No Taylor
anon-04p2
Posted: Tue, Dec 11 2012, 2:18 pm EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
I was there and the person you mention and others recommended an ordinance for vacant and unoccupied buildings. They did not support a full town wide ordinance. Further, they raised a number of concerns over the language.
anon 1211-01q2
Posted: Tue, Dec 11 2012, 2:16 pm EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
Yes, I was at the meeting. Let me clarify was that the majority of the supporters were from Four Seasons and a few residents outside of this development. The majority of the people against this new ordinance live outside the Four Seasons development.
anon-8q9r
Posted: Tue, Dec 11 2012, 1:02 pm EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
anon 1211-01q2 wrote:
Disappointed indeed. I felt that Mulligan, Cook and Johnson were going to approve this new ordinance prior to the meeting and whatever comments were voiced. Interesting I did not see any long time Cranbury residents who now live in Four seasons at this meeting, only those who are relatively new to Cranbury. The surprise is that this new ordinance will not "improve" the look of the Chaneny and Hagerty properties one bit. They only need to cut the grass, keep the fence together and make sure there are doors and window panes in place. The only way this property will change is new owners knocking the buildings down and then we will see how Four Seasons residents react to what ever new development is proposed. When they purchased their Four Seasons homes they saw that they would be living next to or passing these properties, so it was their choice! If the real estate market was still booming these properties would have been redeveloped years ago.
And are you sure you attended the same meeting I did last night? I heard several residents who do not live in four seasons speak in favor of this and one women a long time resident who lives on north main street next to an empty home not being cared for who also supported this.
anon-8q9r
Posted: Tue, Dec 11 2012, 1:01 pm EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
anon-8670 wrote:
I was disappointed last night. There was a large contingent of residents who showed up opposing the ordinance. Mr. Mulligan tried to counter each one by saying it was not the intent and Mr. Johnson was visibly annoyed at the residents who opposed the ordinance. The only ones who showed up supporting it were from 4 seasons who due to their own Home owners association are not even subject to this ordinance. I really feel the TC erred last night and will not support either Mr. Mulligan or Mr. Johnson.
Only Mr. Taylor opposed it. I was also disappointed in the attitude of some of the 4 seasons people. I heard very nasty comments directed toward Mr. Taylor sitting next to a few of them. One even told me they'll vote him out. I responded by saying he was just re-elected last month. Their response was simply oh, how long does he have? They had no clue about our town or community and I have only lived here 3 years.
Are you sure you attended the same meeting I did last night? I heard several residents who do not live in four seasons speak in favor of this and one women a long time resident who lives on north main street next to an empty home not being cared for who also supported this.
anon 1211-01q2
Posted: Tue, Dec 11 2012, 11:47 am EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
Disappointed indeed. I felt that Mulligan, Cook and Johnson were going to approve this new ordinance prior to the meeting and whatever comments were voiced. Interesting I did not see any long time Cranbury residents who now live in Four seasons at this meeting, only those who are relatively new to Cranbury. The surprise is that this new ordinance will not "improve" the look of the Chaneny and Hagerty properties one bit. They only need to cut the grass, keep the fence together and make sure there are doors and window panes in place. The only way this property will change is new owners knocking the buildings down and then we will see how Four Seasons residents react to what ever new development is proposed. When they purchased their Four Seasons homes they saw that they would be living next to or passing these properties, so it was their choice! If the real estate market was still booming these properties would have been redeveloped years ago.
anon-8670
Posted: Tue, Dec 11 2012, 8:42 am EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
I was disappointed last night. There was a large contingent of residents who showed up opposing the ordinance. Mr. Mulligan tried to counter each one by saying it was not the intent and Mr. Johnson was visibly annoyed at the residents who opposed the ordinance. The only ones who showed up supporting it were from 4 seasons who due to their own Home owners association are not even subject to this ordinance. I really feel the TC erred last night and will not support either Mr. Mulligan or Mr. Johnson.
Only Mr. Taylor opposed it. I was also disappointed in the attitude of some of the 4 seasons people. I heard very nasty comments directed toward Mr. Taylor sitting next to a few of them. One even told me they'll vote him out. I responded by saying he was just re-elected last month. Their response was simply oh, how long does he have? They had no clue about our town or community and I have only lived here 3 years.
anon 10-01q2
Posted: Mon, Dec 10 2012, 10:31 am EST
Post subject: Re: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
Public comment on the new property maintenance code tonight!
anon-0802
Posted: Thu, Dec 6 2012, 10:14 pm EST
Post subject: The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda and more
The December 10, 2012 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
http://www.cranburytownship.org/TC-Documents/2012/TC_Agenda121012.pdf
On Friday, December 7th, from 6:00-7:00p.m. families can enjoy the Annual Women's Club of Cranbury Christmas Tree Lighting and visit Santa's Workshop. Santa will meet with kids at the firehouse immediately following the Christmas tree lighting
http://www.cranburytownship.org/notices/Tree-Lighting_120712.html
The regular meeting of the Municipal Alliance Committee will be held on December 12, 2012, at 8:00 a.m. in the Thomas Gambino Room of the Cranbury Public Library.
http://www.cranburytownship.org/ma_agendas/2012/MA-agenda121212.pdf
TAKE NOTICE that on the 5th day of December 2012 the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Township of Cranbury in the County of Middlesex took the following actions:
http://www.cranburytownship.org/zb_agendas/2012/ZB_agenda120512-actions.pdf