Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
James
Posted: Wed, Jun 18 2008, 7:04 pm EDT
Post subject: Interview with Bill Baroni
On Hank Kalet's blog he has posted a very good article about his interview with Sen. Bill Baroni (http://channel-surfing.blogspot.com/) . I believe Sen. Baroni is one individual who is seen by both parties as a force and one who offers a sound mind and judgement.
Some excerpts include:
The warehousing formula, as he says, is "not even close to being based on science -- there is no data to support it." Plus, he adds, the retroactive nature of the rules -- which require towns to factor in development that occurred as far back at 2004 -- contradicts the planning basis on which the Mount Laurel decisions were made.
"One of the goals of the Mount Laurel decisions was to have towns plan better, to make sure that they plan for affordable housing in their towns," he said. "Retroactivity runs counter to that smart-growth approach and I have a problem with that."
He said the final product needs to respect the "core moral responsibility of providing affordable housing," but also respect the needs of local towns.
- and-
"How do we provide affordable housing, keeping the commitment we've made, but also recognize that there are economic, health and space issues that towns have already run into?" he asked. "At what point, do you say we can do no more
"At one point, you will have a clash between affordable housing and open space. If trends that are apparent now don’t change, you will have towns faced with requirements to build but the only space available would be the open space."