Author Message
Guest
PostPosted: Fri, Aug 17 2012, 10:35 am EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

This guy is the biggest piece of crap i've ever seen. i know the girl referenced in the article and the more i hear about this degenerate pervert, the more i am convinced he should be put to death.
Bucks Courier Times
PostPosted: Sat, Dec 13 2008, 9:47 pm EST    Post subject: Delay frustrates molester’s victims

Delay frustrates molester’s victims
By LAURIE MASON
Staff Writer

Prosecutors Friday asked a Bucks County judge to force a convicted child molester to report to prison the moment he’s released from the hospital.

Frederick Kelmer, 50, was supposed to be sentenced in Bucks County Court in Doylestown for molesting two girls is his former Lower Makefield home. Kelmer, who now lives on Cranbury Station Road in Cranbury, N.J., instead checked himself into a New Jersey hospital complaining of heart attack symptoms.

County Judge David Heckler said he was suspicious of Kelmer’s claim, but after looking at a doctor’s note and other information presented by Kelmer’s attorney, the judge ruled Kelmer, instead of reporting to jail, must appear at a bail hearing when he’s released from the hospital.

Heckler said he sympathized with Kelmer’s victims — who have endured six continuances already in the case — but said he did not believe he could legally send the child molester directly to jail. The judge promised to come in to court to oversee a hearing as soon as Kelmer was available, even if that meant cutting his holiday vacation short.

“It is, of course, remarkably inconvenient for all concerned,” Heckler said. “The victims do have a right to put this behind them.”

A jury in June found Kelmer guilty of six counts of indecent assault and two counts of corruption of minors. The panel found that Kelmer molested two girls, one over a six-year time span starting when she was 5 years old and the other while she was 8 or 9 years old.

The incidents occurred while Kelmer lived in the Makefield Glen development from 1998 to 2004.

http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/111-12132008-1637450.html
Guest
PostPosted: Thu, Jul 24 2008, 1:39 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

This is why parents need to be vigilant in watching what and who their kids are posting on the web.
Princeton Packet
PostPosted: Thu, Jul 24 2008, 1:37 pm EDT    Post subject: Plainsboro man charged with maintaining sexual relationship with 13-year-old

Plainsboro man charged with maintaining sexual relationship with 13-year-old he met on the Web
Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:30 AM EDT
By Greg Forester, Staff Writer




PLAINSBORO — A Plainsboro man was arrested July 10 and charged with numerous sex crimes for maintaining a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old Westfield girl he met on the Web, police said.

Westfield police charged Derek McDonough, 28, of Bradford Lane with sexual assault, luring and enticing a child, endangering the welfare of a child and criminal sexual contact.

Mr. McDonough met the girl over the social networking Web site MySpace about six months ago and began communicating regularly with the girl, according to Capt. Cliff Auchter.

Soon the two arranged to meet somewhere near Westfield and engaged in sexual activity, Capt. Auchter said.

They continued to meet in the months leading up to Mr. McDonough’s July 10 arrest, with most of the illegal activity going on at scattered locations near the girl’s Westfield home, police said.
Sometime that week, the girl’s parents noticed some suspicious activity on the family computer the girl had used to contact Mr. McDonough, police said.

They contacted police, who interviewed the victim and pieced together what had been going on between the girl and Mr. McDonough during the previous six months, according to police.

That information was used as probable, according to Capt. Auchter, who said Westfield police then went to Plainsboro Township to take Mr. McDonough into custody.

Mr. McDonough is being on $150,000 bail in the Union County jail in Elizabeth.

http://www.packetonline.com/articles/2008/07/24/the_princeton_packet/news/doc4885fcf784e25814594610.txt
dinsdale
PostPosted: Wed, Jul 16 2008, 9:20 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

He looks like a weirdo!
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 6:08 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault





The many faces of Fred. He has had 2 MySpace accounts. One has been taken off, but the other one is still there.
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 6:06 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

Didn't he go to Hightstown High School?
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 5:08 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

Sound like he spent alot of time in this area.

Read on:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/princeton-junction-nj/TJQ19JCQCU8CP67JO
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 4:50 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

Apparently there were are least one victim from NJ but it is not confirmed.

Read the responses to the article posted on:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/111-06262008-1554829.html

Let's hope there will be justice done in NJ too. I just wish we have more info.
aResident
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 4:20 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

I thought the sex offender lives in Cranbury, "Station Rd," not "Cranbury Station Rd." The mistake will make residents living near Station Rd. plenty to worry about. I am glad it is clarified.
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 4:16 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

[quote="Guest"]
Guest wrote:
I think you missed the point of making sure the facts are straight. It's not about that he lives in Monroe or Cranbury; It about jursidiction, making sure that the proper agencies investigate and prosecute if neccesary. It would be so easy for this type of crime to be bypassed because it fell thru the cracks due to wrong info or because he is doing time in another state.


Not only that - It is super important that Monroe residents should be aware of it too. Let's hope there were no more victims.
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 4:10 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

Guest wrote:
It's disgusting that some of Cranbury's residents are less concerned about the crimes this man committed then what side of 130 they were committed on. A child being abused is not any less repulsive if it happens in the township of Cranbury or in Monroe with a Cranbury mailing address.


I think you missed the point of making sure the facts are straight. It's not about that he lives in Monroe or Cranbury; It about jursidiction, making sure that the proper agencies investigate and prosecute if neccesary. It would be so easy for this type of crime to be bypassed because it fell thru the cracks due to wrong info or because he is doing time in another state.
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 3:45 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

It's disgusting that some of Cranbury's residents are less concerned about the crimes this man committed then what side of 130 they were committed on. A child being abused is not any less repulsive if it happens in the township of Cranbury or in Monroe with a Cranbury mailing address.
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 2:17 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

This is a disturbing thing. However, I think a point does need to be made it is Monroe and not Cranbury. A lot of media outlets use Cranbury because of the turnpike and that some of Monroe years ago (prior to the zip change) I believe had Cranbury addresses.
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 2:16 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

Guest wrote:
"KELMER, Frederick, Jr.; 211 Cranbury Station Road Monroe Township, NJ 08831 (US)."

Should the titled be changed to "Monroe Male" then?


Maybe it should - However, the arresting officers and the news reports have stated he was a Cranbury Resident. This is something that needs to be verified by our own township officials. Otherwise, we are passing around further disinformation.
Guest
PostPosted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 2:11 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Cranbury Male Found Guilty Of Indecent Sexual Assault

"KELMER, Frederick, Jr.; 211 Cranbury Station Road Monroe Township, NJ 08831 (US)."

Should the titled be changed to "Monroe Male" then?