Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Last Word Take 2"]REPEAT POST FROM PRIOR THREAD- Let's end this now please so we can all move on. This thread is or should be dead. However, I wanted to highlight a quote from today's Cranbury Press which I think we all need to consider and am thankful Jay Taylor has this sight and strength as a new TC member to make a stand on the record. Regardless of party we should consider this to be the closing remark. I hope the Republicans respect this position for Mayor Stout and that those saying Jay's a teabagger because of party see he's considered 2 Democrats and one Republican and voted for a Democrat based on town interest. ”The mayoral role should go to a veteran committee member of whom we are fortunate to have three qualified individuals — Mr. Stannard, Mr. Stout and Mr. Cody,” Mr. Taylor said. “Mayor Stout being both a veteran committee member and a past mayor is qualified to hold the position. Therefore, it was important for our town that I join with Win in a bipartisan show of support for Mr. Stout.” http://www.centraljersey.com/articles/2010/01/08/cranbury_press/news/doc4b4668881fa57080407899.txt[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Sat, Jan 9 2010, 5:24 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
How do we know Jay would want do this? He has a baby at home and does a lot in town already from my seeing him at other meetings before and after the election, plus has a full time job. Perhaps the PB would be too much and that's why no one asked him or he asked them not to nominate him.
I would fully support Jay next year for Mayor or PB provided he wants it. I say this because I know his dad served as a Democrat in the 90's and did a lot in town. I think most people share in values imparted by their families. At least as a parent of grown children I hope they do.
Naive
Posted: Sat, Jan 9 2010, 10:02 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Have you considered the possibility that the fact that Win's nomination was seconded was personal and not partisan?
Win has spent a year pushing the other TC Members on a variety of issues, often openly drawing their motives into question with a confrontational style. Perhaps the other committee members simply don't want to spend another 100 hours a year with him? After all, these people are volunteers.
Though still strong minded, Jay seems to be more affable and potentially easier to work with. However, the other poster was right. Jay already has a lot to do this year.
Guest
Posted: Sat, Jan 9 2010, 9:54 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Guest wrote:
Because he is Republican. The Dems just keep pushing the Repubs down. It is a problem going on here for many many years.
Democracy is so unfair, isn't it
Guest
Posted: Sat, Jan 9 2010, 9:16 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Guest wrote:
Because he is Republican. The Dems just keep pushing the Repubs down. It is a problem going on here for many many years.
My vote for stupidest post on silliest thread of all time. Nobody nominated Jay for the same reason nobody nominated David Cook. At the time of nominations each of them had one half hour of experience on the TC. Dave and Jay will have plenty to do in the next year. They have to learn various policies and procedures. They need to start forming relationships at the county and state level. They need to get to know and access the quality of professionals and employees that work for the township. I believe both Jay and Dave would agree they have plenty to do.
If you want to complain about Jay not being nominated in a year, please do. At that point it would be a valid complaint.
Guest
Posted: Sat, Jan 9 2010, 9:05 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Because he is Republican. The Dems just keep pushing the Repubs down. It is a problem going on here for many many years.
Naive
Posted: Sat, Jan 9 2010, 8:26 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Why didn't someone nominate Jay for the Planning Board post?
Last Word Take 2
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 11:14 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
REPEAT POST FROM PRIOR THREAD- Let's end this now please so we can all move on.
This thread is or should be dead. However, I wanted to highlight a quote from today's Cranbury Press which I think we all need to consider and am thankful Jay Taylor has this sight and strength as a new TC member to make a stand on the record. Regardless of party we should consider this to be the closing remark. I hope the Republicans respect this position for Mayor Stout and that those saying Jay's a teabagger because of party see he's considered 2 Democrats and one Republican and voted for a Democrat based on town interest.
”The mayoral role should go to a veteran committee member of whom we are fortunate to have three qualified individuals — Mr. Stannard, Mr. Stout and Mr. Cody,” Mr. Taylor said. “Mayor Stout being both a veteran committee member and a past mayor is qualified to hold the position. Therefore, it was important for our town that I join with Win in a bipartisan show of support for Mr. Stout.”
http://www.centraljersey.com/articles/2010/01/08/cranbury_press/news/doc4b4668881fa57080407899.txt
Guest
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 11:10 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
The thread that will not die. It just keeps popping up with new titles.
Guest
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 11:03 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Give it a rest. Wait until something substantive occurs.
Jeff M.
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 10:59 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Dan,
I want to thank you for putting your name on a letter such as this. That is a hard thing to do in a small town.
Whether Democrat or Republican we should all want bipartisanship. We only benefit from this approach. This is the same independent of who holds a majority. Though, we do let our personal politics get in the way and take a we won you lost view. We won therefore you lose so we get control. That mentality from either party damages our town because all 5 are elected equally. There is no Win or Lose on Cranbury's level and should not be. Unfortunately, as I tell people no matter our age we always still have that high school attitude in us.
I am sure Mr or Ms Guest would be the first one screaming if Republicans held a majority and excluded Democrats. I am also sure I would be screaming right along side Guest. Just as I am backing your letter today because the principle is the same.
We have 60 plus posts on the other thread. The quote from Mr. Taylor hit the proverbial nail on the head- we had 3 long term TC members and town interest is supporting someone independent of party. The majority of of posts call for bipartisanship. The majority also are written by Guest. We had no reason to exclude Win and we had no reason not to support Mr. Stout for Mayor and Mr. Stannard for planning board. All three could be used for our benefit.
I commend you for writing a letter with your name and taking it off the internet and to the paper.
I only wonder if and who will respond in kind to your letter.
Guest
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 10:37 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Guest wrote:
Sour grapes, You lost - The Republicans don't have a majority. The Democrats do. Be a man about it and stop complaining
The electorate had an opportunity to vote in a slate of two Democrats running together or two Republicans running together. They ignored these slates and split the vote. That seems like a clear signal that the majority of us in the Township want bipartisanship and not party politics. yet you are advocating that the TC members ignore that mandate and consider their party affiliation first, last and always. That's out of sync with the majority of the community.
By the way, two of the last two people elected have been Republican. There is a three-to-two Democrat majority (where there used to be a 4-to-1 majority) because two of the three Democrats are in the sunset of their term. It’s certainly possible to take your “scorched Earth” approach to do everything partisan and intentionally exclude the rest of the TC and any electorate that support them. But isn’t that a bit short sighted? Will you be equally accepting when inevitably the other party eventually has a majority if they were to shut-out anyone who isn’t part of their party? This kind of attitude is exactly why national politics are so dysfunctional right now. Why would you want to emulate a failed model?
Guest
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 10:15 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Guest wrote:
Sour grapes, You lost - The Republicans don't have a majority. The Democrats do. Be a man about it and stop complaining
You're a loser.
The candidates were asked during the campaign about the policy of the Democrats currently on the TC to only appoint Democrats to volunteer board positions and the candidates from both parties expressed disapproval of it and said they would not continue that tradition. Yet here we are.
So what you are saying is it is okay for the candidates to be dishonest during the campaign and it is a given that once elected they should put their party ahead of everything else, including the interests of the Township?
If that is the prevailing opinion of Cranbury Democrats then maybe I should follow Tom Panconi's lead and switch from Democrat to Independent because I don't want anything to do with such an unethical organization.
Outsider looking in
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 9:54 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Although I do not know Dan, from reading his posts here I believe he only has what is best for Cranbury on his agenda. I also hope he runs again.
Let's not attack someone personally and anonymously. I do not take any personal anonymous complaint here seriously. If the poster used their real name then I would give their opinion some value. Before you jump on me for remaining anonymous, I am not making a personal attack against anyone here.
Thank You
Guest
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 9:05 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
Guest wrote:
He did run. Did you? He ran in order to serve the interests and needs of our town. Have you? Perhaps you should stop with the childish sniping.
No, I did not run. I voted for Dan.
I don't understand who you are referring to in the above quote.
Guest
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 8:57 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
He did run. Did you? He ran in order to serve the interests and needs of our town. Have you? Perhaps you should stop with the childish sniping.
Guest
Posted: Fri, Jan 8 2010, 8:51 am EST
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Press Letter to the Editor:"So much for bipartisanship in Cran
He should run again. My vote will again go to him.