Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Jennier-s68p"][quote="anon-54r5"][quote="Jennifer-s68p"]So I'm guessing I'm talking to either David N., James F., or Charles K.? One thing us "young liberals" (which I take as a huge compliment considering I'm in my 40s) have on you, is the ability to track people's names down using FB based on your likes and follows. I know all about your Visible Cranbury page and that you have published the names of members of that group. Your pages have been reported and will be deleted. Yes, us "young liberals" are such a threat to democracy. We're just doing our part to protect democracy from 45's tyrannical Administration and trying our best to block sexist, racist, misogynistic, climate change denying, homophobic, xenophobic, money hogs from destroying our country, our planet, and our basic human rights. Just as "old liberals" did during the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement. And yes, Susan is offering her help...or at least was until her boss found out. [/quote] I am not one of those individuals. You post these generic statements, but like every issue there are nuances. Trump infastructure programs are good, if Trump revises the tax code to eliminate the ATM it will be good. There are certainly many many wrong things as well. But yelling and shouting down people you don't agree with so our representatives stop holding Town Halls is counter intuitive. No one is going to listen to you and all these protestors do is strengthen the person's resolve that they are yelling at and strengthening their supporters. I have posted prior here many times that being liberal is not shutting down discussion. It is not having safe places on campus because something was said that hurt one's feelings. Being Liberal meant talking about issues, debating, listening and understanding. It's essence was being uncomfortable and not afraid to have discussions. Being liberal meant being welcoming and respecting of different religions and backgrounds. It wasn't telling a convent of nuns that they had to pay for birth control if it violated their religious rights. Many great works of literature, songs and plays were written by liberals opening up dialogue. Today's groups like indivisible and OFA run counter to liberal ideals. These groups tell you what you can say, what you can't say, what you can read, what you should not. It goes counter to liberal ideals and ideology.[/quote] Thank you for explaining to me what a complacent liberal is...I knew they existed, but I appreciate the education, nonetheless. I, on the other hand, am an active liberal, I act, and if you don't like the way I act, to quote one of your comrades, "get over it."[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
anon-q2r7
Posted: Mon, May 29 2017, 1:10 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
These people are disturbing. I hope they realize that the views they have are not welcome in Cranbury.
anon-s6p5
Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2017, 8:48 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
People are really showing they are misinformed about our local government.
First, the Deputy Mayor title is meaningless. As is essentially the title of Mayor. Our TC is 5 equal people who anually nominate these positions. So thereis no real value beyond ceremony to these titles.
Second, of the five on the TC the least ones likely to be looking for greener pastures or to leave are Mr Cook and Mr Taylor. They both have deep roots and commitment to Cranbury. As a friend of Mr Taylor's I know he's turned down career opportunities to stay here. Mr Cook is deeply conncted to the town. The others perhaps, but I doubt it. Mr. Johnson is older and few people decide NJ is a worthwhile state to retire in, but some do. Ms.Goetz maybe, but her grandson is here. Mr. Mulligan perhaps but he has kids and in laws here in town.
A problem with being in a small town is people join and do things without thinking of broader views beyond Cranbury. In looking at the member list that was posted there seemed to be many members not from Cranbury. Maybe these posters are just instigators.
Our town has avoided becoming East Windsor or Hightstown with politics the past 10 years. Let's keep it that way and look at how they have handled themselves as a indicator.
anon;oqs6-054q
Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2017, 8:08 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
Unfortunatly the Mayor is playing the typical politician. He really hates to admit the truth. It might be good to follow his reputation and see how all of his escapades have affected his family and the folks around him. This guy is just another self serving politician. The fact is that most of these "Concerned" politicians are really Resume Builders--look at the Michael Mayes, Pari Stave, Richard Stannard, David Stout ,Becky Beaugard types who built the resume then after their reign of spending have decided to move on to greener pastures. David Cook and Susann Goetz are no different and we will be left with the spoils and tax burdens when they cash out---Shame Shame, Shame--------
anon-s68p
Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2017, 7:01 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
anon-32p3 wrote:
Dear Forum posters and anonymous,
It is unfortunate that claims and accusations become distorted in this venue and create a chilling effect on legitimate interaction between points of view. Both Susan Goetz and I understand that by taking office we take the chance of becoming targets of passionate individuals. As a result of being accused of not telling the truth I invite those to get involved in the democratic process we all hold dear and come to a Township Committee meeting and talk to us.
They are normally held twice a month and are open to the public.
Asking members of the Township Committee to resign over being vigilant and aware of the concerns of its constituents whether individuals or in groups is not productive.
As I said in an earlier response, it is important to be aware of the issues that affect Cranbury residents. You can’t do that responsibly with your head in the sand. By recognizing different groups including Indivisible Cranbury we are doing our duty as fiduciaries of keeping a responsive and open government.
For more information check our website. (www.cranburytownship.org/)
Thank you
David Cook
Mayor
Cranbury Township
Sir, with all due respect, your Deputy Mayor admitted to being an active member and posting in the group. Not only did she offer to help and guide members, but she complimented the groups' determination and was very enthusiastic. I know this because I am one of the people who responded to her offer for guidance. She admitted this in her post in this thread. So, to say that you are being "accused of not telling the truth", is inaccurate if you are indeed speaking for yourself and the Deputy Mayor. You may be telling your truth, but this is not the truth of your Deputy Mayor.
As for threats of impeachment, I find it ridiculous, but I find your spin on this fact more disturbing.
anon-32p3
Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2017, 2:14 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
Dear Forum posters and anonymous,
It is unfortunate that claims and accusations become distorted in this venue and create a chilling effect on legitimate interaction between points of view. Both Susan Goetz and I understand that by taking office we take the chance of becoming targets of passionate individuals. As a result of being accused of not telling the truth I invite those to get involved in the democratic process we all hold dear and come to a Township Committee meeting and talk to us.
They are normally held twice a month and are open to the public.
Asking members of the Township Committee to resign over being vigilant and aware of the concerns of its constituents whether individuals or in groups is not productive.
As I said in an earlier response, it is important to be aware of the issues that affect Cranbury residents. You can’t do that responsibly with your head in the sand. By recognizing different groups including Indivisible Cranbury we are doing our duty as fiduciaries of keeping a responsive and open government.
For more information check our website. (www.cranburytownship.org/)
Thank you
David Cook
Mayor
Cranbury Township
R U A Russian Spy-s68p
Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2017, 1:33 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
RU a troll?-q2q6 wrote:
Jennifer-s68p wrote:
So I'm guessing I'm talking to either David N., James F., or Charles K.? One thing us "young liberals" (which I take as a huge compliment considering I'm in my 40s) have on you, is the ability to track people's names down using FB based on your likes and follows. I know all about your Visible Cranbury page and that you have published the names of members of that group. Your pages have been reported and will be deleted.
Yes, us "young liberals" are such a threat to democracy. We're just doing our part to protect democracy from 45's tyrannical Administration and trying our best to block sexist, racist, misogynistic, climate change denying, homophobic, xenophobic, money hogs from destroying our country, our planet, and our basic human rights. Just as "old liberals" did during the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement. And yes, Susan is offering her help...or at least was until her boss found out.
Jennifer,
Are you a real person or a troll? You kind of sound like Milo.
Yes, comrade, I'm a Russian troll hanging out in Cranbury looking to connect with my fellow spies. Meet me at the drop off location for further instructions from Trump and Putin.
RU a troll?-q2q6
Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2017, 10:34 am EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
Jennifer-s68p wrote:
So I'm guessing I'm talking to either David N., James F., or Charles K.? One thing us "young liberals" (which I take as a huge compliment considering I'm in my 40s) have on you, is the ability to track people's names down using FB based on your likes and follows. I know all about your Visible Cranbury page and that you have published the names of members of that group. Your pages have been reported and will be deleted.
Yes, us "young liberals" are such a threat to democracy. We're just doing our part to protect democracy from 45's tyrannical Administration and trying our best to block sexist, racist, misogynistic, climate change denying, homophobic, xenophobic, money hogs from destroying our country, our planet, and our basic human rights. Just as "old liberals" did during the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement. And yes, Susan is offering her help...or at least was until her boss found out.
Jennifer,
Are you a real person or a troll? You kind of sound like Milo.
IndivisibleGate-s076
Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2017, 9:40 am EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
Joining Indivisible Cranbury is bad enough but misleading the public with a cover-up is inexcusable. Mayor Cook’s letter done in conjunction with Ms. Goetz stated they were not members of the resistance group, Indivisible. In fact, Ms. Goetz was outed by one of her own colleagues in Invisible, she was an active member, joining and giving support to the group.
Unfortunately, due to the extreme secrecy and closed communications of the group, we cannot see what Ms. Goetz has been posting.
Based upon false statements trying to hide allegiance to the group, Ms. Goetz should resign from the Township Committee.
We also need to know if Mayor Cook was complicit in this falsehood and cover-up. Mayor Cook, can you please answer if you knew that Ms. Goetz told you about her affiliation prior to writing your note or did she mislead you as well.
anon-s6p5
Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2017, 7:59 am EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
By the way here is an example of nuance. In the latest order Trump supported Obama's dreamers order and established a special court to hear cases of children who have been caught going over the border illegally.
In both cases, this is good news. So if I were opposing Trump point blank I would be opposing these measures.
anon-s6p5
Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2017, 7:10 am EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
Jennifer. See your own posts don't spark dialogue. They attack and they and they demean. That may make you feel great and happy. But it won't win you any arguments. And just has people ignore you or strengthen their resolve.
Going somewhere and shouting down people is not going to achieve an objective. As someone in their 40's i would think you'd know this.
Going to town halls and asking thoughtful questions, encouraging dialogue as James F had here. That is how if you are truly active you will win your points.
To me the "active" liberals like yourself are no better than trump.
Jennier-s68p
Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2017, 10:52 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
anon-54r5 wrote:
Jennifer-s68p wrote:
So I'm guessing I'm talking to either David N., James F., or Charles K.? One thing us "young liberals" (which I take as a huge compliment considering I'm in my 40s) have on you, is the ability to track people's names down using FB based on your likes and follows. I know all about your Visible Cranbury page and that you have published the names of members of that group. Your pages have been reported and will be deleted.
Yes, us "young liberals" are such a threat to democracy. We're just doing our part to protect democracy from 45's tyrannical Administration and trying our best to block sexist, racist, misogynistic, climate change denying, homophobic, xenophobic, money hogs from destroying our country, our planet, and our basic human rights. Just as "old liberals" did during the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement. And yes, Susan is offering her help...or at least was until her boss found out.
I am not one of those individuals. You post these generic statements, but like every issue there are nuances.
Trump infastructure programs are good, if Trump revises the tax code to eliminate the ATM it will be good. There are certainly many many wrong things as well. But yelling and shouting down people you don't agree with so our representatives stop holding Town Halls is counter intuitive. No one is going to listen to you and all these protestors do is strengthen the person's resolve that they are yelling at and strengthening their supporters.
I have posted prior here many times that being liberal is not shutting down discussion. It is not having safe places on campus because something was said that hurt one's feelings. Being Liberal meant talking about issues, debating, listening and understanding. It's essence was being uncomfortable and not afraid to have discussions.
Being liberal meant being welcoming and respecting of different religions and backgrounds. It wasn't telling a convent of nuns that they had to pay for birth control if it violated their religious rights.
Many great works of literature, songs and plays were written by liberals opening up dialogue. Today's groups like indivisible and OFA run counter to liberal ideals.
These groups tell you what you can say, what you can't say, what you can read, what you should not. It goes counter to liberal ideals and ideology.
Thank you for explaining to me what a complacent liberal is...I knew they existed, but I appreciate the education, nonetheless. I, on the other hand, am an active liberal, I act, and if you don't like the way I act, to quote one of your comrades, "get over it."
Susan Goetz
Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2017, 10:37 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
So there is no confusion, I was invited very early on to the Facebook page for Indivisible, was interested in their activities and curious about the group and I accepted the invitation. I did not intend that to be an acceptance of all that they stand for but I did believe that there were concerns I personally shared with others on the page. I am also in complete agreement with what Dave Cook wrote about the role of elected officials in understanding the community they represent and this is one way to understand what some people in this town are passionate about. He and I discussed it before he posted his statement and he spoke for both of us. The reference to my offer to help related to one article posted on Facebook which discussed the importance of people being involved and encouraged people to run for office. This is the topic I encouraged and to which I offered my help. I truly believe that each of us has something to offer to make this community and this country the best it can be and for some running for office is one way to do that. I did offer to help anyone who was interested in running for office to discuss the process, the challenges and the rewards of working for your community. Jennifer, I still make that offer to you. This does not mean I support everything Indivisible states or does but it does mean I support everyone being involved and having a voice. As Dave Cook clearly articulated for both of us, as an elected official in Cranbury, I consider it my responsibility to understand issues that are significant and I appreciate all respectful and informed dialogue. (Cant help but to point out that this forum does not always meet that basic requirement of respectful and informed), and I continue to urge people to reach out to me directly if you have something you wish to clarify or wish for me to understand. We are all in this together and we can only make it through and make it better if we talk the time to listen to each other and
respectfully
share our ideas.
Thank you - Susan
anon-54r5
Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2017, 9:20 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
By the way I am in my 40's as well and am very proud to call myself a classic liberal.
anon-54r5
Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2017, 9:18 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
Jennifer-s68p wrote:
So I'm guessing I'm talking to either David N., James F., or Charles K.? One thing us "young liberals" (which I take as a huge compliment considering I'm in my 40s) have on you, is the ability to track people's names down using FB based on your likes and follows. I know all about your Visible Cranbury page and that you have published the names of members of that group. Your pages have been reported and will be deleted.
Yes, us "young liberals" are such a threat to democracy. We're just doing our part to protect democracy from 45's tyrannical Administration and trying our best to block sexist, racist, misogynistic, climate change denying, homophobic, xenophobic, money hogs from destroying our country, our planet, and our basic human rights. Just as "old liberals" did during the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement. And yes, Susan is offering her help...or at least was until her boss found out.
I am not one of those individuals. You post these generic statements, but like every issue there are nuances.
Trump infastructure programs are good, if Trump revises the tax code to eliminate the ATM it will be good. There are certainly many many wrong things as well. But yelling and shouting down people you don't agree with so our representatives stop holding Town Halls is counter intuitive. No one is going to listen to you and all these protestors do is strengthen the person's resolve that they are yelling at and strengthening their supporters.
I have posted prior here many times that being liberal is not shutting down discussion. It is not having safe places on campus because something was said that hurt one's feelings. Being Liberal meant talking about issues, debating, listening and understanding. It's essence was being uncomfortable and not afraid to have discussions.
Being liberal meant being welcoming and respecting of different religions and backgrounds. It wasn't telling a convent of nuns that they had to pay for birth control if it violated their religious rights.
Many great works of literature, songs and plays were written by liberals opening up dialogue. Today's groups like indivisible and OFA run counter to liberal ideals.
These groups tell you what you can say, what you can't say, what you can read, what you should not. It goes counter to liberal ideals and ideology.
anon-s68p
Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2017, 8:00 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
anon-q2r7 wrote:
Jennifer-s68p wrote:
So I'm guessing I'm talking to either David N., James F., or Charles K.? One thing us "young liberals" (which I take as a huge compliment considering I'm in my 40s) have on you, is the ability to track people's names down using FB based on your likes and follows. I know all about your Visible Cranbury page and that you have published the names of members of that group. Your pages have been reported and will be deleted.
Yes, us "young liberals" are such a threat to democracy. We're just doing our part to protect democracy from 45's tyrannical Administration and trying our best to block sexist, racist, misogynistic, climate change denying, homophobic, xenophobic, money hogs from destroying our country, our planet, and our basic human rights. Just as "old liberals" did during the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement. And yes, Susan is offering her help...or at least was until her boss found out.
You LOST get over it! You are the minority, get over it. You will not accomplish anything President Trump always wins period.
He lost the popular vote by 3 million. You're in the minority, dude.
Jennifer-s68p
Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2017, 7:52 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Indivisible cranbury
Oh, that set me straight. Thank you! We won't stop until he's out of office..get used to that.