Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="??-4678"]To clarify, is there a claim or insinuation that there is systematic exclusion of people of specific demographics from town service? Having observed town elections and, to a lesser extent, board appointments for a number of years I see (1) that candidates for committee and board appointments tend to be hard to attract each year and (2) no evidence that interested persons are voted in/appointed (or not) based on any discernible set of characteristics. Those who step up and express a willingness to serve in whatever capacity are actually quite welcomed. I am disappointed by efforts to create division. The comments about recognition (a blue line) for police in our town are simply stunning and sad. I am glad to know that most officers know my child, my home, me, etc. I appreciate the annual community event at the park and opportunities to talk to officers individually. Nice community engagement. The outlandish generalization about how hurtful the blue line on Main is/was doesn't warrant repeating here, but strikes me as ironic in that it seems antithetical to a purported interest in creating a more inclusive and accepting community (i.e., vilify police...isn't that a bit judgmental and divisive?? It is an "us" vs. "them" stance and differentiates or singles out a group of persons). I also wondered if the person making this statement at the meeting has taken time to speak with an officer (or volunteer for a board position). Reminds me of the counsel: be the change you wish to see...[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
anon-2163
Posted: Mon, Jun 18 2018, 1:29 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
I believe it. Progressives want to unseat incumbents. That's all. They don't care if you are a republican or a democrat. If you have been at this for more than one term you are the "old guard" and they want you out. They tried to take the fast lane by inventing their own board but when that was shot down the write in campaign was a hail Mary that might have worked if they had been able to keep it under wraps. Primaries usually have very low turnouts in Cranbury, if they had been able to sneak their members in to write in, we could easily have a Ferrante/Huang ballot this fall.
It will be interesting to see what happens in November.
liers huang ferrante-rqsq
Posted: Mon, Jun 18 2018, 11:55 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
Andrew Huang spoke at the Township Committee meeting to set the record straight about why he was a write-in candidate who tried to unseat Jay Taylor, the incumbent who won the contest.
Huang is a liar
Ferrante is a lier
they worked together to unseat Jay Taylor
Ferrante Huang Scott along with their indivisible group want to make cranbury be Princeton
Getting rid of Jay Taylor was the first step in their plan
they all must be stopped
anon-8pqp
Posted: Thu, Jun 14 2018, 6:36 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
anon-4os8 wrote:
Election Crime-rqsq wrote:
It looks like Andrew Huang and Mike Ferrante broke election law do I report it here
http://www.elec.state.nj.us
can anyone report this or does the town need to?
Just out of curiosity, how do you establish that Ferrante broke any election laws? What do you have proof he did? Certainly not the flier since he's on record as saying he had nothing to do with it and nowhere does the flier say it's approved by his campaign. Again, what can you prove as oppose to believe? Was there some other provable action?
Legal history is replete with stories of persons or companies turning a manageable legal problem into a more serious one by trying to hide or destroy evidence, see Watergate and Arthur Anderson/Enron for two notable examples.
anon-284r
Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 9:52 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
Proof? This is Cranbury.info. Go elsewhere for proof.
anon-4os8
Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 7:40 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
Election Crime-rqsq wrote:
It looks like Andrew Huang and Mike Ferrante broke election law do I report it here
http://www.elec.state.nj.us
can anyone report this or does the town need to?
Just out of curiosity, how do you establish that Ferrante broke any election laws? What do you have proof he did? Certainly not the flier since he's on record as saying he had nothing to do with it and nowhere does the flier say it's approved by his campaign. Again, what can you prove as oppose to believe? Was there some other provable action?
anon-8720
Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 6:26 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
anon-834s wrote:
anon-284r wrote:
Go for it! But then again... You're just a windbag anyways.
There’s that word again.
Someone get this troll a thesaurus.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/windbag
anon-8720
Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 6:23 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
Election Crime-rqsq wrote:
It looks like Andrew Huang and Mike Ferrante broke election law do I report it here
http://www.elec.state.nj.us
can anyone report this or does the town need to?
Email all your TC members.
http://www.cranburytownship.org/twp_committee.html
and get it done. We are with you brother Cohen!
anon-834s
Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 6:10 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
anon-284r wrote:
Go for it! But then again... You're just a windbag anyways.
There’s that word again.
Someone get this troll a thesaurus.
anon-284r
Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 5:58 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
⚆ _ ⚆
anon-284r
Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 4:39 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
Go for it! But then again... You're just a windbag anyways.
Election Crime-rqsq
Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 4:33 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
It looks like Andrew Huang and Mike Ferrante broke election law do I report it here
http://www.elec.state.nj.us
can anyone report this or does the town need to?
anon-834s
Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 5:28 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
anon-117o wrote:
anon-834s wrote:
anon-117o wrote:
anon-117o wrote:
... sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary
The secret is out! Low voter turnout during primaries, who knew? Thanks for the education. LOL
It’s not a secret that was the point. Not very bright, are you? LOL.
https://goo.gl/ZJHH69
Not clicking the link, did you have something to say?
anon-117o
Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 5:10 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
anon-834s wrote:
anon-117o wrote:
anon-117o wrote:
... sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary
The secret is out! Low voter turnout during primaries, who knew? Thanks for the education. LOL
It’s not a secret that was the point. Not very bright, are you? LOL.
https://goo.gl/ZJHH69
anon-834s
Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 5:03 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
anon-117o wrote:
anon-117o wrote:
... sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary
The secret is out! Low voter turnout during primaries, who knew? Thanks for the education. LOL
It’s not a secret that was the point. Not very bright, are you? LOL.
anon-117o
Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 4:58 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
anon-117o wrote:
... sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary
The secret is out! Low voter turnout during primaries, who knew? Thanks for the education. LOL
anon-834s
Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 3:45 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Budget Article
anon-117o wrote:
Pretty impressive rant. But what's even more impressive is that a write in candidate received over 100 votes. About the same as the "known" Republican candidates.
( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°)
Yes, it’s almost as if the sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary most of the time and that’s why the write in campaign was so hush hush until 2 days before the election and Dan Mulligan pulled the curtain back.