Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Guest"]It isn't the substance so much but the concern about the potential of driving under the influence. You can do a great deal of harm behind the wheel of a car if your reflexes are impaired. Keep to the privacy of your own home and then others are not in harms way.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Thu, Apr 17 2008, 8:29 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Man Charged with Drug Possession
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy !
Ha Ha Ha
Guest
Posted: Mon, Mar 10 2008, 11:53 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Man Charged with Drug Possession
Well that's why we have open container laws too. I'm not talking about driving home from the liquor store after buying a case of beer, in terms of the concern. I guess we have to hope that this guy just happened to be driving home after buying some pot, which was neatly packaged for smoking when he arrived safely at his destination. Alcohol, pot, cocaine...whatever, it is a danger when you combine it with an automobile. That's the only point I'm trying to make. I'm not trying to say someone should be in trouble for thinking about smoking some pot. That's not what the write up says happened. The guy was speeding, he had pot and stuff and that's why he got in trouble. He wasn't just sitting around "thinking."
Guest
Posted: Mon, Mar 10 2008, 10:52 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Man Charged with Drug Possession
While the "potential" was there, that is something that you cant prove. There is "potential" if you were driving with liquor or beer in your car too. Luckily you cant be convicted of Thoughtcrime yet.
Thoughtcrime does not entail death: thoughtcrime is death.
-Winston Smith, 1984
Guest
Posted: Sun, Mar 9 2008, 9:28 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Man Charged with Drug Possession
I understand. That's why I said potential of driving under the influence. It still represents a danger to my mind.
Guest
Posted: Sun, Mar 9 2008, 9:12 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Man Charged with Drug Possession
Guest wrote:
It isn't the substance so much but the concern about the potential of driving under the influence. You can do a great deal of harm behind the wheel of a car if your reflexes are impaired. Keep to the privacy of your own home and then others are not in harms way.
He was charged with 'Drug Possession,' not DUI.
Guest
Posted: Sun, Mar 9 2008, 8:42 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Man Charged with Drug Possession
It isn't the substance so much but the concern about the potential of driving under the influence. You can do a great deal of harm behind the wheel of a car if your reflexes are impaired. Keep to the privacy of your own home and then others are not in harms way.
Guest
Posted: Sun, Mar 9 2008, 8:16 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Cranbury Man Charged with Drug Possession
Guest wrote:
Patrick Ward, 31, of Cranbury was charged with possession of marijuana under 50 grams and drug paraphernalia after being pulled over for speeding on Route 571 at Southfield Road at 11 p.m. Friday, police reported. It was determined he was in possession of marijuana and a pipe, police said. - From the Princeton Packet, March 4th, 2008
What harm did the man do to others?
It's a bogus human-made 'law' that says you cannot posses a certain kind of plant!
Guest
Posted: Sun, Mar 9 2008, 6:38 pm EDT
Post subject: Cranbury Man Charged with Drug Possession
Patrick Ward, 31, of Cranbury was charged with possession of marijuana under 50 grams and drug paraphernalia after being pulled over for speeding on Route 571 at Southfield Road at 11 p.m. Friday, police reported. It was determined he was in possession of marijuana and a pipe, police said. - From the Princeton Packet, March 4th, 2008