Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="news"]Affordable housing rules may change Locals wary of assembly proposal By Sean Ruppert, Special Writer Posted: Friday, December 7, 2007 11:04 AM EST Proposed changes to state affordable housing regulations could have an impact on some area towns that have traditionally paid cities to build some of the state-required low- and moderate-income housing unit slated for the suburbs. On Nov. 13, state Assembly Speaker Joseph Roberts (D-Camden), Assembly Majority Leader Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-Mercer), and Assemblyman Jerry Green (D-Union) introduced a 12-point plan to reform the state’s affordable housing program. The Assembly members say their plan will allow the state to meet Gov. Jon S. Corzine’s goal of creating 100,000 new affordable housing units statewide over the course of the next 10 years. Among the provisions is the banning of regional contribution agreements, which allow municipalities to pay urban communities to take up to half of their affordable housing obligations. Both Cranbury and Monroe have used the method, while South Brunswick has not. Critics of RCAs, including the Assembly leadership, argue that they perpetuate poverty by keeping people in the inner cities. They say that limiting the number of affordable housing units in suburban areas decreases the likelihood that people will be able to move out of poverty-stricken cities. ... http://www.packetonline.com/articles/2007/12/07/cranbury_press/news/doc47596e1b97aa7064587401.prt[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
news
Posted: Fri, Dec 7 2007, 5:28 pm EST
Post subject: Affordable housing rules may change
Affordable housing rules may change
Locals wary of assembly proposal
By Sean Ruppert, Special Writer
Posted: Friday, December 7, 2007 11:04 AM EST
Proposed changes to state affordable housing regulations could have an impact on some area towns that have traditionally paid cities to build some of the state-required low- and moderate-income housing unit slated for the suburbs.
On Nov. 13, state Assembly Speaker Joseph Roberts (D-Camden), Assembly Majority Leader Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-Mercer), and Assemblyman Jerry Green (D-Union) introduced a 12-point plan to reform the state’s affordable housing program.
The Assembly members say their plan will allow the state to meet Gov. Jon S. Corzine’s goal of creating 100,000 new affordable housing units statewide over the course of the next 10 years.
Among the provisions is the banning of regional contribution agreements, which allow municipalities to pay urban communities to take up to half of their affordable housing obligations. Both Cranbury and Monroe have used the method, while South Brunswick has not.
Critics of RCAs, including the Assembly leadership, argue that they perpetuate poverty by keeping people in the inner cities. They say that limiting the number of affordable housing units in suburban areas decreases the likelihood that people will be able to move out of poverty-stricken cities.
...
http://www.packetonline.com/articles/2007/12/07/cranbury_press/news/doc47596e1b97aa7064587401.prt