Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="news"]Affordable housing rules change Friday, December 21, 2007 12:09 PM EST By Maria Prato-Gaines, Staff Writer New affordable-housing rules issued by the state on Monday could increase the cost of the program and require more units to be built in Cranbury and Monroe. Officials in Monroe are concerned that the new regulations could affect the township’s ability to preserve open space, because vacant land may have to be designated for affordable units. Cranbury officials are reviewing the new rules and are reserving comment. The new rules were issued last week, nearly a year after a state Superior Court invalidated the state Council on Affordable Housing’s previous calculation. A state appellate panel ruled in January that some of the new COAH rules, including those that allow municipalities to determine their own housing obligation and allow half their units to be age-restricted, were insufficient. The new rules, which would increase the total number of affordable units required statewide from 52,000 to 115,000, will continue with what COAH calls a “growth share approach,” which measures the need for affordable housing in municipalities based on the amount of residential and commercial development expected to take place between 2004 and 2014. Growth-share ratios would be set at one affordable-housing unit for every 16 jobs or five residential units created. The original third-round rules called for one unit per 25 jobs or nine housing units. In addition, COAH increased the amount that towns will be required to pay for participating in regional contribution agreements from $35,0000 per unit to between $67,000 and $80,000, depending on the region. Under a regional contribution agreement, a municipality pays a “distressed” municipality to build up to half of its required units. ... http://www.packetonline.com/articles/2007/12/21/cranbury_press/news/doc476bf35a26550288794542.prt[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
news
Posted: Fri, Dec 21 2007, 5:29 pm EST
Post subject: Affordable housing rules change
Affordable housing rules change
Friday, December 21, 2007 12:09 PM EST
By Maria Prato-Gaines, Staff Writer
New affordable-housing rules issued by the state on Monday could increase the cost of the program and require more units to be built in Cranbury and Monroe.
Officials in Monroe are concerned that the new regulations could affect the township’s ability to preserve open space, because vacant land may have to be designated for affordable units. Cranbury officials are reviewing the new rules and are reserving comment.
The new rules were issued last week, nearly a year after a state Superior Court invalidated the state Council on Affordable Housing’s previous calculation.
A state appellate panel ruled in January that some of the new COAH rules, including those that allow municipalities to determine their own housing obligation and allow half their units to be age-restricted, were insufficient.
The new rules, which would increase the total number of affordable units required statewide from 52,000 to 115,000, will continue with what COAH calls a “growth share approach,” which measures the need for affordable housing in municipalities based on the amount of residential and commercial development expected to take place between 2004 and 2014. Growth-share ratios would be set at one affordable-housing unit for every 16 jobs or five residential units created. The original third-round rules called for one unit per 25 jobs or nine housing units.
In addition, COAH increased the amount that towns will be required to pay for participating in regional contribution agreements from $35,0000 per unit to between $67,000 and $80,000, depending on the region. Under a regional contribution agreement, a municipality pays a “distressed” municipality to build up to half of its required units.
...
http://www.packetonline.com/articles/2007/12/21/cranbury_press/news/doc476bf35a26550288794542.prt