Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Guest"]Just a reminder: if you have not sent your comments to NJ COAH, please do it today. Email: coahmail@dca.state.nj.us US Mail: Lucy Voorhoeve, Executive Director NJ Council on Affordable Housing PO Box 813 Trenton, NJ 08625-0813[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Sat, Mar 22 2008, 9:27 am EDT
Post subject: Re: How can you help with comments on the COAH's Proposed Rules?
Just a reminder: if you have not sent your comments to NJ COAH, please do it today.
Email:
coahmail@dca.state.nj.us
US Mail:
Lucy Voorhoeve, Executive Director
NJ Council on Affordable Housing
PO Box 813
Trenton, NJ 08625-0813
Guest
Posted: Thu, Mar 20 2008, 8:44 am EDT
Post subject: How can you help with comments on the COAH's Proposed Rules?
How can you help with comments on the
Council of Affordable Housing’s Proposed Rules?
This is the link for viewing the proposed rules:
http://www.state.nj.us/dca/coah/dec07proposal.shtml
COAH’s Process for filing comments on the Proposed Rules
All comments should be identified by the applicable N.J.A.C. citation and submitted in the following format:
Format example: “5:94-1.3. Comment: The definition of household should be changed to delete the reference to persons under age 18.” This may be followed with any supporting reasons, references, and any other additional information that the commenter wishes to supply.
The Council encourages comments to be submitted in electronic form to:
coahmail@dca.state.nj.us
to enable an expeditious review and response. Such comments should include the words “Rule Comments” in the subject box. The Council will also accept written comments sent via mail and or fax at
(609) 633-6056, but requests a follow-up PC-formatted disk in Microsoft Word to be delivered as soon as possible thereafter to enable comments to be processed electronically. Fax copies shall also be followed by a mailed copy if a disk is not possible.
Submit written comments to:
Lucy Voorhoeve, Executive Director
NJ Council on Affordable Housing
PO Box 813
Trenton, NJ 08625-0813
The deadline to submit comments is Saturday, March 22, 2008.
Rule Comments to NJAC 5:94
“5:94 Appendix D Use Group “S” Storage uses. This section includes warehouses. It is proposed that the job generation ratio be 1.5 per 1,000 square feet.
Comment: The COAH job generation ratio for warehouses has increased 750 per cent over the ratios that COAH adopted in 2004. The job numbers far exceed the actual number of jobs that Cranbury Township’s own research shows are created by the warehouses in the Township.
“5:94-2.5
Comment: If this change (from the 2004 adopted rules) in the job generation ratios is left as proposed, Cranbury Township will face a retroactive obligation of 469 units, which is a 1,072 percent increase, just to address warehouse development that already has approvals. This equates to half, or fifty per cent of the total housing constructed to date in Cranbury Township. The retroactive obligation related to warehousing equates to sixty-eight million dollars in construction costs alone. The retroactivity related to warehouses approved up until June 1, 2008 should be removed.
http://www.cranburytownship.org/COAH-comments-031808.html