Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Tue, Feb 19 2008, 11:55 am EST
Post subject: Re: Viridian presents redevelopment plan
An affordable housing obligation is incurred whenever new jobs are added. So if a Warehouse is built then there is a new employer with a new jobs staffing the warehouse. This means that in today's obligation for every 30 jobs created an affordable housing unit needs to be built. If they have 100 employees, then there are 3 new affordable housing units being required to be built. Even with just 30 people, there is one more obligation required. If the legislation in the state passes, then we'll be in a position of not being able to pay another town like South Amboy to take the obligation. I don't believe the long term affects of say 3 new houses is worth the rateables that a warehouse brings in.
In terms of concrete floors, while the munitions are sealed there are several devices that could be set off with heat. Heat can pass through a concrete floor so there is a possible issue remaining . In addition, the exterior of the building is not concrete so the heat transfer around the buildings immediate exterior could cause issues with unexploded ordinances.
IMO, this is a clear example of corporate greed of revenue over safety for employees or town.
Guest
Posted: Tue, Feb 19 2008, 9:09 am EST
Post subject: Re: Viridian presents redevelopment plan
It would seem that a fire in a building on the property would not pose a high risk as far as the munitions go, as they would be under the concrete floor. At this time however, as there are no hydrants in the area, the fire co. depends on tankers for a water supply out there. Hopefully they will absorb the cost of running city water and hydrants to the area.
gpoint
Posted: Tue, Feb 19 2008, 8:36 am EST
Post subject: Re: Viridian presents redevelopment plan
Good point about the safety for fire fighters.
But I don't understand why Cranbury has to increase affordable housing units when new commercial warehouses are built?
Guest
Posted: Tue, Feb 19 2008, 8:09 am EST
Post subject: Re: Viridian presents redevelopment plan
I see a couple of things.
1) On the postive we add an additional rateable.
2) On the negative there will be an increase in the affordable housing obligation. Under the pending rules this may mean Cranbury will have to build further housing units within the town. Couple this and the potential truck stop and the housing obligations for the town if the legislation is passed could be substantial for a small town like Cranbury. The town should be looking to reduce developments that will incur housing obligations. In fact it might be cheaper for the town to purchase additional land than the long term effects that new growth brings in terms of any type of housing.
3) The one thing no one seems to be concerned about is the safety of the emergency services. If Viridian wants to set up a building on grounds with ammunition and can find someone who will put their employees in there then it is there issue. If there is a fire in the building then the Cranbury Volunteers are at risk. Given that even the Viridian ammunitions expert said you cannot be 100% sure the ammunitions are gone, I question the safety of this project. I know I would not want to step into a building that is on fire on that property.
Guest
Posted: Mon, Feb 18 2008, 10:04 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Viridian presents redevelopment plan
anybody knows any impacts to cranbury residents? my concern is it may significantly increase affordable housing liability to the township.
news
Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2008, 6:28 pm EST
Post subject: Viridian presents redevelopment plan
Viridian presents redevelopment plan
By Maria Prato-Gaines, Staff Writer
Posted: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:06 PM EST
CRANBURY — Viridian unveiled plans to redevelop a contaminated piece of property on Brickyard Road, Feb. 7.
The Colorado-based company bought the 395-acre parcel in Cranbury’s industrial district in January 2006 and is investing more than $100 million to redevelop the property.
Complicating the redevelopment plan is that explosive and volatile debris were scattered throughout the site in 1954, when a former munitions plant, Unexcelled, exploded. The company is in the midst of remediating the leftover explosives in the area.
Viridian’s proposal calls for the construction of three warehouses — one approximately 1.12 million square feet, one approximately 1.13 million square feet and another 538,000 square feet — at the northeast corner of Route 130 and Brickyard Road.
The company is using the placement of the three warehouses to hard cap the area of the property that has the highest concentration of munitions and explosives concerns or MEC.
...
http://www.packetonline.com/articles/2008/02/15/cranbury_press/news/doc47b5c49b331d5337847979.prt