Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="anon-6o8n"][quote="Richard Moody-rso4"][quote="anon-0537"][quote="Richard Moody-rso4"]The Sirens went off at 5.40 am and 5.47 am this morning - Wed Oct 9. Isn't there a moratorium on the use of Sirens between 10.00 pm and 6.00 am each night?[/quote] Richard Moody - please go move somewhere else - all you do is complain - if you do not like this town , then leave!![/quote] I love Cranbury. Why would I voluntarily lead Historical Walking Tours of Cranbury Village and Monmouth Battlefield and give talks on the architecture and history of Cranbury if I didn't like it here. All I'm looking for is peace and tranquility for our preserved Village - dating back to 1697. Sirens are a health hazard (check the WHO), are disruptive to businesses and in schools and have an adverse effect on house prices (check Univ of Illinois study) for those houses within earshot of the Sirens.[/quote] Would this imply that the sirens saved you money on your own home purchase in Cranbury?[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
anon-5r97
Posted: Fri, Dec 19 2014, 8:36 am EST
Post subject: Re: Sirens
As far as i'm concerned this issue is one for those doing the job to decide. At tax timeI don 't tell my accountant what to do as i am not qualified and that's why I use him.
Same logic applies here. If those responding know what works then in my view they are the ones to decide.
anon-332s
Posted: Thu, Dec 18 2014, 11:48 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Sirens
It's really not necessary. Most towns have done away with their sirens. When the trucks move to the fire, yes, they need the truck sirens to clear traffic in front of them. But the townwide siren is not necessary anymore. I would not say it affects property value, just noise pollution,and we have plenty of that with the highways near us, we don't need more.
anon-1pop
Posted: Thu, Dec 18 2014, 5:43 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Sirens
Totally agree that it is 100% necessary
This is dumb-0538
Posted: Tue, Dec 16 2014, 7:11 am EST
Post subject: Re: Sirens
Sirens signal it's time to volunteer. When was the last time any of you siren whiners volunteered for the Fire dept or 1 st aid squad and saved someone's life?? All I have to say to you whiners is STFU!! Keep the sirens and live life. I'm 2 blocks from the firehouse and hear them once in a while and it's of no bother to me!!
Keep on saving lives and volunteering in our community!!
And affects property values??? Hahahaha by what $45?? STFU
BobRogers
Posted: Sun, Dec 14 2014, 10:21 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Sirens
I believe that the siren is annoying and totally unnecessary. It is just noise pollution.
anon-ppqn
Posted: Sat, Dec 13 2014, 7:08 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Sirens
It is very loud but it is also a very important safety issue.
anon-pp5r
Posted: Tue, Oct 21 2014, 9:59 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
Crosswicks is part of Chesterfield township, so everything is different with the comparison.
anon-4o76
Posted: Sun, Oct 19 2014, 12:56 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
Crosswicks is a volunteer fire company, but they pay 4 firefighters full time pay to supplement the company. As such they don't need a siren because they have people at the firehouse from 7am-5pm.
I would rather have a siren than 4 paid firefighters.
Confused-rso4
Posted: Sun, Oct 19 2014, 9:17 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
anon-921r wrote:
anon-92r4 wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
anon-6o8n wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
anon-0537 wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
The Sirens went off at 5.40 am and 5.47 am this morning - Wed Oct 9.
Isn't there a moratorium on the use of Sirens between 10.00 pm and 6.00 am each night?
Richard Moody - please go move somewhere else - all you do is complain - if you do not like this town , then leave!!
I love Cranbury. Why would I voluntarily lead Historical Walking Tours of Cranbury Village and Monmouth Battlefield and give talks on the architecture and history of Cranbury if I didn't like it here. All I'm looking for is peace and tranquility for our preserved Village - dating back to 1697. Sirens are a health hazard (check the WHO), are disruptive to businesses and in schools and have an adverse effect on house prices (check Univ of Illinois study) for those houses within earshot of the Sirens.
Would this imply that the sirens saved you money on your own home purchase in Cranbury?
It's not just the values of houses within earshot of the Sirens that suffer but also the ability to sell those houses is often jeopardized.
That ignores the question. If the sirens lower the value then you would have saved money when you purchased a house near the sirens. Additionally, why would you have purchased a house near sirens?
Having friends near the siren, none of them thought of it. They looked at home appearance, location and school. So I don't think sirens played a factor. I do know one friend said as they looked at the home the church bells went off and they said that was it. What better small town charm. All have been here multiple years so if the siren were an issue I am sure they'd have moved.
Crosswicks, settled in 1677 and another historic village, dispensed with their sirens many years ago and now rely exclusively on pagers and texts (with vibration modes). I agree with Mr Moody that Cranbury should follow suit.
anon-921r
Posted: Sat, Oct 18 2014, 8:24 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
anon-92r4 wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
anon-6o8n wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
anon-0537 wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
The Sirens went off at 5.40 am and 5.47 am this morning - Wed Oct 9.
Isn't there a moratorium on the use of Sirens between 10.00 pm and 6.00 am each night?
Richard Moody - please go move somewhere else - all you do is complain - if you do not like this town , then leave!!
I love Cranbury. Why would I voluntarily lead Historical Walking Tours of Cranbury Village and Monmouth Battlefield and give talks on the architecture and history of Cranbury if I didn't like it here. All I'm looking for is peace and tranquility for our preserved Village - dating back to 1697. Sirens are a health hazard (check the WHO), are disruptive to businesses and in schools and have an adverse effect on house prices (check Univ of Illinois study) for those houses within earshot of the Sirens.
Would this imply that the sirens saved you money on your own home purchase in Cranbury?
It's not just the values of houses within earshot of the Sirens that suffer but also the ability to sell those houses is often jeopardized.
That ignores the question. If the sirens lower the value then you would have saved money when you purchased a house near the sirens. Additionally, why would you have purchased a house near sirens?
Having friends near the siren, none of them thought of it. They looked at home appearance, location and school. So I don't think sirens played a factor. I do know one friend said as they looked at the home the church bells went off and they said that was it. What better small town charm. All have been here multiple years so if the siren were an issue I am sure they'd have moved.
anon-92r4
Posted: Sat, Oct 18 2014, 7:49 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
anon-6o8n wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
anon-0537 wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
The Sirens went off at 5.40 am and 5.47 am this morning - Wed Oct 9.
Isn't there a moratorium on the use of Sirens between 10.00 pm and 6.00 am each night?
Richard Moody - please go move somewhere else - all you do is complain - if you do not like this town , then leave!!
I love Cranbury. Why would I voluntarily lead Historical Walking Tours of Cranbury Village and Monmouth Battlefield and give talks on the architecture and history of Cranbury if I didn't like it here. All I'm looking for is peace and tranquility for our preserved Village - dating back to 1697. Sirens are a health hazard (check the WHO), are disruptive to businesses and in schools and have an adverse effect on house prices (check Univ of Illinois study) for those houses within earshot of the Sirens.
Would this imply that the sirens saved you money on your own home purchase in Cranbury?
It's not just the values of houses within earshot of the Sirens that suffer but also the ability to sell those houses is often jeopardized.
That ignores the question. If the sirens lower the value then you would have saved money when you purchased a house near the sirens. Additionally, why would you have purchased a house near sirens?
anon-1225
Posted: Fri, Oct 17 2014, 5:36 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
anon-0537 wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
The Sirens went off at 5.40 am and 5.47 am this morning - Wed Oct 9.
Isn't there a moratorium on the use of Sirens between 10.00 pm and 6.00 am each night?
Richard Moody - please go move somewhere else - all you do is complain - if you do not like this town , then leave!!
I love Cranbury. Why would I voluntarily lead Historical Walking Tours of Cranbury Village and Monmouth Battlefield and give talks on the architecture and history of Cranbury if I didn't like it here. All I'm looking for is peace and tranquility for our preserved Village - dating back to 1697. Sirens are a health hazard (check the WHO), are disruptive to businesses and in schools and have an adverse effect on house prices (check Univ of Illinois study) for those houses within earshot of the Sirens.
Hasn't anyone got the guts to reveal their name when they are showering personal abuse at me? I'd be very happy to meet any "abusers" at Teddy's for a coffee and a grown up chat about how unnecessary Sirens are in this day of Pagers and Texts - both with vibrating capabilities - when these are currently used between 10 pm and 6 am at night (most of the time!).
If I remember correctly, aren't you away from Cranbury for 6 months out of the year living somewhere else?? Why come back and complain? It was so "PEACEFUL AND TRANQUIL" without you back complaining about the siren. It is what it is. Deal with it or live somewhere else full time.
anon-921r
Posted: Thu, Oct 16 2014, 5:59 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
Sorry meant to say they found pagers and texts lacking.
anon-921r
Posted: Thu, Oct 16 2014, 5:52 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
I try to be sensible. Whether this or the library, but the home value makes little sense nor does volunteers wanting the siren to show people they're responding.
- unless you bought your home a hundred years ago the siren has been in effect. Assuming a siren depresses the market the cost has already been factored into your purchase price. The homes increase in value is then independent of the siren.
- how often do the sirens sound that create a depressed value? There needs to be some equation used.
- if people live outside of siren range than how does it help show volunteers are responding.
Let's call this as it is. The siren is a nuisance to some people. There are people finding arguments both ways.
The issue I see is does any argument trump safety. Mr. Moody, perhaps you could volunteer and see what goes into the response. Right now you only present one side.
If the volunteers are using texts and pagers then they clearly have tried other options and not found them lacking.
Richard Moody-rso4
Posted: Thu, Oct 16 2014, 4:03 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
anon-6o8n wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
anon-0537 wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
The Sirens went off at 5.40 am and 5.47 am this morning - Wed Oct 9.
Isn't there a moratorium on the use of Sirens between 10.00 pm and 6.00 am each night?
Richard Moody - please go move somewhere else - all you do is complain - if you do not like this town , then leave!!
I love Cranbury. Why would I voluntarily lead Historical Walking Tours of Cranbury Village and Monmouth Battlefield and give talks on the architecture and history of Cranbury if I didn't like it here. All I'm looking for is peace and tranquility for our preserved Village - dating back to 1697. Sirens are a health hazard (check the WHO), are disruptive to businesses and in schools and have an adverse effect on house prices (check Univ of Illinois study) for those houses within earshot of the Sirens.
Would this imply that the sirens saved you money on your own home purchase in Cranbury?
It's not just the values of houses within earshot of the Sirens that suffer but also the ability to sell those houses is often jeopardized.
anon-6o8n
Posted: Thu, Oct 16 2014, 2:51 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Sirens
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
anon-0537 wrote:
Richard Moody-rso4 wrote:
The Sirens went off at 5.40 am and 5.47 am this morning - Wed Oct 9.
Isn't there a moratorium on the use of Sirens between 10.00 pm and 6.00 am each night?
Richard Moody - please go move somewhere else - all you do is complain - if you do not like this town , then leave!!
I love Cranbury. Why would I voluntarily lead Historical Walking Tours of Cranbury Village and Monmouth Battlefield and give talks on the architecture and history of Cranbury if I didn't like it here. All I'm looking for is peace and tranquility for our preserved Village - dating back to 1697. Sirens are a health hazard (check the WHO), are disruptive to businesses and in schools and have an adverse effect on house prices (check Univ of Illinois study) for those houses within earshot of the Sirens.
Would this imply that the sirens saved you money on your own home purchase in Cranbury?