Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Cranbury Press"]CRANBURY: Water tower to be demolished Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:47 AM EDT By Natalie Lescroart, Staff Writer CRANBURY— After a 10-year battle to preserve the “Historic Cranbury” water tower, members of the town’s Historical and Preservation Society disappointedly acknowledge its necessary demolition. The New Jersey American Water Co., which owns both the water tower and the land it sits on, received the Historic Preservation Commission’s approval of its request to remove the structure about two weeks ago. According to a release on the township’s Web site, the company will begin the process of dismantling the tower “on or around June 22.” ”We have secured a contract to dismantle the tower,” said Richard Barnes, spokesman for American Water. Mr. Barnes added that the engineering and construction firm, Henkels and McCoy, will begin the process at the end of next week. In the meantime, American Water will place public notices around town. Somber resignation has been the general sentiment in the wake of the decision to take down the tower, which has served as a prominent feature of the community’s skyline since its construction in 1906. Although the water tower has been out of service for a decade, members of the Cranbury Historical and Preservation Society had talked of perhaps buying the tower from the company in order to preserve its “iconic” structure. ”The water tower has much historic significance to the town and village,” said society member and long-time Cranbury resident Mark Berkowsky. “It has been an icon in Cranbury’s history, and it is visible from almost any place around the township.” But, at a cost of approximately $300,000, the plan didn’t prove economically feasible. ”It’s a matter of dollars and cents, and it’s much more than we could deal with right now,” said Township Historian Betty Wagner. Ultimately, Mr. Berkowsky and other society members say the situation is one of “demolition by neglect,” noting the tower’s steadily worsening condition. Mr. Barnes has said that the water tower has begun to leak in the last few years. ”Part of our lack of total objection (to the demolition) is the fact that there are serious structural issues with the water tower, which means safety issues,” said Mr. Berkowsky. ”We certainly would have preferred the water tower’s being protected 10 years ago so that we could have prevented it from getting to this point,” said Mr. Berkowsky. “So, we’re disappointed, but we understand.” The New Jersey American Water Co. has promised to allow the historical society to keep any artifacts, photographs or documentation deemed to be of historical significance. Mr. Barnes and American Water will present the society with the small “finial ball” from the top of the water tower as an historical souvenir. Both Ms. Wagner and Mr. Berkowsky expressed their appreciation for the cooperation of the company during this difficult time. ”The New Jersey American Water Co. has been cooperative in offering to provide us with any historical artifacts that might come up, and we appreciate that,” said Ms. Wagner. With the demolition now imminent, some Cranbury residents, including Frank and Peggy Brennan, have urged that “adequate precautions” be taken so as to avoid the dangerous dispersal of lead paint and debris in the area around the water tower. Mr. Barnes wants to assure the Cranbury public that the contractor will keep all paint chips secured. ”No lead paint chips will be dispersed in the air or will fall on the ground,” said Mr. Barnes. “The whole thing will be done in a very environmentally conscience way.” http://www.centraljersey.com/articles/2009/06/18/cranbury_press/news/doc4a3a6072778b3933647595.txt[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Tue, Jun 23 2009, 10:23 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Elmo wrote:
Guest wrote:
What about the COAH impact?
Don't worry about COAH. Elmo thinks maybe Hyatt Place will set aside 20% of their suites for low and moderate income guests.
Considering that NJ taxpayers are already subsidizing housing, education, healthcare and car insurance, why not throw in maid service, too?
Guest
Posted: Mon, Jun 22 2009, 9:46 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Let's allow an apartment building for low income to go up right next to the hotel. Satisfies COAH and will add to the skyline void left by the water tower.
Elmo
Posted: Mon, Jun 22 2009, 6:51 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Guest wrote:
What about the COAH impact?
Don't worry about COAH. Elmo thinks maybe Hyatt Place will set aside 20% of their suites for low and moderate income guests.
Guest
Posted: Mon, Jun 22 2009, 8:47 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
What about the COAH impact?
Guest
Posted: Mon, Jun 22 2009, 8:17 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
If the skyline is such a big issue, can we get rid of the cell towers that stick up into the sky? The owners of the property where the cell towers stick high into the skyline are making a nice profit from these eyesores. Then some complain that a new building will have a negative impact.
All this complaining about "progress". I do not understand why some people get so scared of any new business opening or building in Cranbury. Won't these new businesses help with taxes? Let's move forward !
Guest
Posted: Sun, Jun 21 2009, 11:55 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Elmo wrote:
Elmo thinks we should move the water tower to the top of the new Hyatt Place hotel for all the world to see.
Elmo very funny. Maybe we can rename the town "Hyatt Place" so we can still have the name of the town advertised above the tree-line.
Welcome to historic Hyatt Place, NJ- home of unbridled commercial development and the highest share of COAH housing per capita in the world!
Guest
Posted: Sun, Jun 21 2009, 10:43 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Quote:
Elmo funny. The library board would still need to do an expensive study first to see if this (once in a lifetime opportunity) makes sense. Its simply not obvious to them that you can't convert the water tower into a usable library, even into the tallest library in the world. (Wow what an opportunity to fill it full of dusty books, and hire new staff, and have a really huge space with our current very little traffic/usage cept for the students.) Wonder if the boy scouts and Sr.Citizens could climb to the meeting rooms at the top? Maybe they can persuade another special interest group to join them and start complaining about lack of meeting rooms in the current. I'm just worried about how much water pressure would be coming out of the drinking faucets if we did this water tower conversion.
Dear Guest,
I can guess by your satirical comments that you are not a library fan. Our public library has so many new books, playways, and other cool things. It is a great place to visit.... Water tower and public library are two different things.
Elmo
Posted: Sun, Jun 21 2009, 9:51 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Elmo thinks we should move the water tower to the top of the new Hyatt Place hotel for all the world to see.
joe the plumber
Posted: Sat, Jun 20 2009, 11:15 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Is there any way to keep the tank part of the tower? You know...the bit that says HISTORIC CRANBURY and put that somewhere?
It does look kinda cool.
JoniMitchell
Posted: Sat, Jun 20 2009, 11:10 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
I guess there are "boutiques" but what about the "screaming hot spot?"Also no big yellow taxi's(yet)
Hoppy
Posted: Sat, Jun 20 2009, 9:30 pm EDT
Post subject:
Jersey Dad wrote:
So the current proposal for Cranbury's skyline is to take down the "Historic Cranbury" water tower and put up a 60 foot tall Hyatt Place hotel. Maybe next year we can "pave paradise and put up a parking lot".
I think that about sums it up. Oh well, at least we get to keep the finial.
Jersey Dad
Posted: Sat, Jun 20 2009, 7:42 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
So the current proposal for Cranbury's skyline is to take down the "Historic Cranbury" water tower and put up a 60 foot tall Hyatt Place hotel. Maybe next year we can "pave paradise and put up a parking lot".
Guest
Posted: Sat, Jun 20 2009, 11:38 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Elmo wrote:
Elmo thinks the library could buy the water tower and make it the "reading tower".
Elmo funny. The library board would still need to do an expensive study first to see if this (once in a lifetime opportunity) makes sense. Its simply not obvious to them that you can't convert the water tower into a usable library, even into the tallest library in the world. (Wow what an opportunity to fill it full of dusty books, and hire new staff, and have a really huge space with our current very little traffic/usage cept for the students.) Wonder if the boy scouts and Sr.Citizens could climb to the meeting rooms at the top? Maybe they can persuade another special interest group to join them and start complaining about lack of meeting rooms in the current. I'm just worried about how much water pressure would be coming out of the drinking faucets if we did this water tower conversion.
Elmo
Posted: Fri, Jun 19 2009, 5:38 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Elmo thinks the library could buy the water tower and make it the "reading tower".
Guest
Posted: Fri, Jun 19 2009, 8:38 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Well for 300,000 it seems the water tower would have been a better buy than a ball field. All they needed to do was make it a "historical park" and we could have had county funds.
Perhaps the Historical Society or another organization can do a fund raising and build an old fashioned wooden water tower on that site to keep the skyline.
Guest
Posted: Fri, Jun 19 2009, 6:40 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Water tower may be torn down
Current tower dates from the 1940s.