Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Guest"]Richard Moody, of Cranbury You kindly published a letter from me in The Cranbury Press some weeks ago concerning the noise pollution created by the Fire Department and First Aid Squads’ sirens, and now the township have given me two further reasons why it is necessary to continue with the sirens. Sirens, which present a health hazard, cause loss of productivity and negatively affect house values for those houses within earshot of those annoying “whoops.” Although both squads use pagers with vibrators at times when the sirens are now silenced, I’ve been told that the sirens are necessary at certain times during the day since it is hard to recruit volunteers unless sirens are used. I find this to be a totally implausible argument since I’m sure many potential volunteers would prefer not to be responsible for the ghastly noise and would much prefer to be working for organizations, which go about their splendid business with as little disruption to the tranquility of Cranbury as possible. I am also told that another reason for the need for sirens is to warn the residents of Cranbury of the impending passage of firetrucks and ambulances. Since I believe that the firetrucks sound their horns and flash lights — the latter also actioned by the ambulances — why is it necessary to give advance warning to an event that is announced by the vehicles themselves? After all, not all emergency vehicles head down Main Street when called out, and the argument that school kids walking to school have to be given advance notice of the possible arrival of the vehicles is very specious. Crossing guards and a policeman are on duty on Main Street at the start and end of the school day, and school children do not walk in the street except at the relevant crossing on Main Street, which is very well controlled and extremely safe. At the same time, the emergency vehicles are allowed through by the police with the minimum of delay should these vehicles be heading past the junction for the school at the relevant school times. I think it’s also fair to say that the vast majority of drivers will always pull over when they see the firetruck and/or ambulance in their rear view mirrors — as they do in other communities, which no longer pollute the environment with this dreadful noise which, at 105 decibels, is way higher that the recommended state daily maximum of 65. And the good citizens of Cranbury are not known for walking in the street when there are excellent sidewalks, and, therefore, they do not impede the progress of the emergency vehicles. I still find it quite bizarre that the volunteer nature of the squads is being used as a reason for the retention of the sirens when pagers with vibrators are used at times of siren silence and are used 24/7 by all the other volunteer squads in local communities who dispensed with sirens some years ago. It would appear to me that it’s still a case of “We’ve always done it this way, and we’re not going to change,” especially when this complaint is coming from a resident who has only been in Cranbury for five months and is considered by both squads to not know what he’s talking about. A number of residents have expressed support for my argument, and the valid reasons for retaining the sirens seem to be dwindling by the day. It’s starting to look as if it all boils down to some sort of perverse machoism where the excellent long-term volunteers want the villagers to know when they are being called out. Presumably, those volunteers called out at night need to sleep by day, which must be difficult when there is another siren attack while they sleep in daytime, and, as I said at the last township meeting, it would be very sad and ironical if the First Aid siren caused a heart attack to someone walking past the siren when it started up with its loathsome noise. After all, the First Aid Squad is there to go to the aid of the infirm and not to cause infirmity. And, only recently, the siren was sounded at 12:15 a.m. in the middle of the night. If the squads are looking for more volunteers and more contributions, an announcement that the sirens are to be silenced forever would probably be very beneficial in both areas. A widespread publicity campaign announcing the termination of the sirens — at the same time requesting greater contributions and more volunteers — would silence the complaints of many of the residents, and, at the same time, hopefully, bringing in more funds and volunteers. Volunteers who can go about their excellent work knowing that they are not responsible for the ghastly noise pollution that we’re now having to endure and volunteers who can be called out efficiently and quietly with the use of their pagers and vibrators at all times. Surely a volunteer mowing the lawn with his music pods in his ears is far less likely to hear a siren than to feel his vibrator operate on his belt. I implore the township to continue to consider this issue and, hopefully, decide to silence the sirens once and for all, at the same time instituting a massive drive for more volunteers in a new more peaceful environment. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the only “noise” we had to listen to in Cranbury was the delightful chiming of the Presbyterian church bells such as the soothing hymn and carol music that graced the evening air on New Year’s Eve?[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
anon-15q1
Posted: Tue, Jun 18 2013, 4:40 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I just look at it like this, if it were my house burning down I would want the fire company there as fast as possible, and if it were a family or friend dying I would want the first aid just as fast.
anon-240q
Posted: Tue, Jun 18 2013, 4:29 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I like the sirens, but then again I don't live right next to them.
JB
Posted: Thu, Jan 12 2012, 9:31 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Sorry but Plainsboro, and West Windsor still use them, the old air raid style like we used to have. Jamesburg also has sirens.
B Rogers
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 3:53 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
You're being silly.
I am most definitely not Richard Moody. I have lived in Cranbury for fourteen years and my daughter is an EMT with Cranbury First Aid Squad. She responds to calls using one of the pagers that the squad issues to all members. The pagers work fine.
no mas means no more
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 3:14 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
no mas wrote:
And......on it goes.
Yes, by virtue of your post....
no mas
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 2:50 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
Richard Moody wrote:
LOLguest wrote:
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Mr. Moody, if you're going to post under another name to make it look like you have support for your position you should try harder next time to use a language and style that isn't so easily identified as your signature, such as your unique use of the phrase "noise pollution." Nice try, but do better. It also undermines your supposed credibility as not posting anonymously though I can understand the urge to try and make it look like you have some support.
I am not B. Rogers who at least has the guts to reveal his name. Perhaps you'd be bold enough to reveal who you are?
And......on it goes.
Richard Moody
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 2:23 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
LOLguest wrote:
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Mr. Moody, if you're going to post under another name to make it look like you have support for your position you should try harder next time to use a language and style that isn't so easily identified as your signature, such as your unique use of the phrase "noise pollution." Nice try, but do better. It also undermines your supposed credibility as not posting anonymously though I can understand the urge to try and make it look like you have some support.
I am not B. Rogers who at least has the guts to reveal his name. Perhaps you'd be bold enough to reveal who you are?
LOLguest
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 8:42 am EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Mr. Moody, if you're going to post under another name to make it look like you have support for your position you should try harder next time to use a language and style that isn't so easily identified as your signature, such as your unique use of the phrase "noise pollution." Nice try, but do better. It also undermines your supposed credibility as not posting anonymously though I can understand the urge to try and make it look like you have some support.
Sirens stay
Posted: Thu, Jan 5 2012, 8:31 am EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I spoke with a majority of the TC and their statement to me is they have discussed and the siren stays. That they feel public safety officials are best to determine the needs and means of response. So this topic should die.
no mas
Posted: Wed, Jan 4 2012, 11:19 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
B Rogers wrote:
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Aaaah, the topic that will not die.
B Rogers
Posted: Wed, Jan 4 2012, 11:00 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I think that the siren is a quaint relic of the 19th and 20th centuries that we can do without. The fact that no other town around here uses one tells you that it's not necessary.
The siren just amounts to noise pollution, which we already have plenty of from the busy roads around here.
Mr. Nuhbuddie
Posted: Mon, Dec 26 2011, 6:27 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
Leftwing townsfolk....... wrote:
I was interested in moving to this town until a few friends of mine told me to read this forum, and they were 100% correct when they told me that there were too many liberals in this town that lack common sense. Any town where the residents get upset over police, fire, and ambulance sirens to the point where they want to silence them is way too far to the left for me and my family to purchase a home there! As a resident of any town, I most certainly would want the EMERGENCY SERVICE responders to make as much noise as possible so any children would have ample warning to get out of the way, and also any elderly who may be behind on the audio scale! My father always said, the liberals will legislate and tax themselves out of their own homes if you give them enough room to do so!
PS: You can keep the excess supply of homes all to yourselves!
What a phony note!
guest13
Posted: Sun, Dec 25 2011, 12:01 am EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
I don't think Mr. Right Wing Out of Towner is a real person, just that same kid who loves to post things they know will provoke responses from people.
But if it's a real person, no loss. Most of the people in this town, right or left leaning politically, are smarter than to orient their entire lives around defining others as right/left or conservative/liberal. Most of us know and are friends with people in both parties. Cranbury takes all kinds, but if you're going to go around hating on people based on a label, please live elsewhere.
aResident
Posted: Sat, Dec 24 2011, 11:38 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
Einstein has spoken wrote:
4000+ people in this town, and Einstein is able to generalize all of them through a small number of anonymous postings. Brilliant.
This guy is no Einstein. I don't care if s/he moves in or not.
Einstein has spoken
Posted: Sat, Dec 24 2011, 11:10 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
4000+ people in this town, and Einstein is able to generalize all of them through a small number of anonymous postings. Brilliant.
guestagain
Posted: Sat, Dec 24 2011, 11:05 pm EST
Post subject: Re: Silence sirens in Cranbury forever
Leftwing townsfolk....... wrote:
I was interested in moving to this town until a few friends of mine told me to read this forum, and they were 100% correct when they told me that there were too many liberals in this town that lack common sense. Any town where the residents get upset over police, fire, and ambulance sirens to the point where they want to silence them is way too far to the left for me and my family to purchase a home there! As a resident of any town, I most certainly would want the EMERGENCY SERVICE responders to make as much noise as possible so any children would have ample warning to get out of the way, and also any elderly who may be behind on the audio scale! My father always said, the liberals will legislate and tax themselves out of their own homes if you give them enough room to do so!
PS: You can keep the excess supply of homes all to yourselves!
funny, I thought the people complaining about everything on this board were right wing zealots. Glad another one isn't moving in.