Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Guest"]Thank you for the previous post. It's always important to know the "players", and sometimes that information is hard to find.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Fri, Mar 20 2009, 8:54 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Bad News "Council on Local Mandates rules Against Mt Laurel"
Thank you for the previous post. It's always important to know the "players", and sometimes that information is hard to find.
Guest
Posted: Thu, Mar 19 2009, 11:06 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Bad News "Council on Local Mandates rules Against Mt Laurel"
Just as a follow up to Dan's post which is information and fact based. The article says independent. However, it's really not.
The Chair is a former Superior Court Judge and a Democrat. So she is vested on both sides of the aisle. She wants to protect the court rulings and attorneys and wants to protect the Democrat base that voted for the legislation.
Leena Brown is a Republican. However, look at her background. Chair of the New Jersey Advisory Committee to the US Commission on Civil Rights and a Commissioner on the President's Commission on White House Fellowships. It's right in line with those in support of COAH.
Timothy Q. Karcher- A democrate and well known party insider in Trenton.
Jack Tarditi- A big Democrat supporter in Trenton. His background would lead one to assume opposition, but that's not the case.
Rita E. Papaleo- Another Democrat
Those against.
Ryan J. Peene- is firmly against the mandates and well known in Republican circles.
So we're at 5-1 with 1 unknown. Can't agree that this is independent in anything, but name.
Dan Mulligan
Posted: Thu, Mar 19 2009, 9:54 am EDT
Post subject: Bad News "Council on Local Mandates rules Against Mt Laurel"
This is bad news for the fight against the unfunded affordable housing rules we have here in New Jersey....
N.J. panel quashes a bid against affordable homes
An independent New Jersey council handed a victory to affordable-housing advocates yesterday when it ended an attempt by Medford and Mount Laurel to throw out some of the state's latest, and toughest, low-income-housing laws.
The entire article can be found here...
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/pennsylvania/20090319_N_J__panel_quashes_a_bid_against_affordable_homes.html