Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Mon, May 11 2009, 1:37 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
The resolution says the money is for "housing and community projects". That doesn't sound like cops, but it does sound like COAH.
Guest
Posted: Mon, May 11 2009, 11:15 am EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
I am curious about why this township commitee pays so much in proffesional fee's ie ..attorneys. This township commitee is paying hundreds of thousands more in lawyers fee's than other commitee's paid just a few years ago.Why are the salaries for town adminstrator and the financial officer so high. Why doesn't the town commitee question this? How can the commitee ask the taxpayers to potentially sacrifice safety and service's when they are hemorhagging money to attorney's and town administrator's? i
Guest
Posted: Mon, May 11 2009, 9:18 am EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
How exactly is the police department under staffed and how do you know?
I agree with the other poster -- the unions make it very hard to control budgets once you make a hire. Its hard to correct staffing levels in the future, make cut-backs or even control salary increases in down times. Under these circumstances, hiring should always be a last resort only done when there is an overwhelming need.
Guest
Posted: Mon, May 11 2009, 8:45 am EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
cranbury wrote:
It could've been used to hire more police FREE for 3 years...but our bright leaders aren't interested in getting ahead.
Unless it benefits them, they could careless. And the dept is under staffed, but I'm sure they have something up their sleeve. After all Smeltzer is making 100K+ for a reason.
And fire them 3 years later?
Once hired it's not easy to fire. Twp settled a lawsuit from a fired employee lately.
A sure way to increase the twp budget permanently (i.e., not an one-time charge) is to hire more people.
There was a large increase of twp employees (more than 10 people) in 2007 and you know what happened to my property tax?
A 22% increase.
Guest
Posted: Mon, May 11 2009, 8:34 am EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
I am wondering if the stimulus money is going to be used for COAH housing.
Guest
Posted: Mon, May 11 2009, 7:54 am EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
I am a big supporter of the police and from speaking with the Chief I have no concern that we are okay for the near term where we are in terms of staffing.
You do realize that after 3 years the obligations still continue for the police. We cannot afford to hire more staff in any department this year or next. There are major expenses coming and the tax structure will be bad enough paying for what the TC in the past has refused to reserve for (e.g. the dam and liberty way). There is only so much a tax base can absorb.
Guest
Posted: Mon, May 11 2009, 7:06 am EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
Our police department is not understaffed. If you look at police hiring averages and guidelines, we have more than the average number of officers. However, we do have conditions that warrant the staffing levels we do have: warehouses, Route 130.
Also, federal stimulus money can not go straight to salaries...it has to be "shovel-ready" construction projects.
cranbury
Posted: Sun, May 10 2009, 8:44 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
It could've been used to hire more police FREE for 3 years...but our bright leaders aren't interested in getting ahead.
Unless it benefits them, they could careless. And the dept is under staffed, but I'm sure they have something up their sleeve. After all Smeltzer is making 100K+ for a reason.
Guest
Posted: Sun, May 10 2009, 9:09 am EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
Hopefully for something large like the Dam or Liberty Way and not being used for something wasteful.
Guest
Posted: Sun, May 10 2009, 12:47 am EDT
Post subject: Re: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
Does anyone know more about what the stimulus money is for?
Guest
Posted: Fri, May 8 2009, 8:16 pm EDT
Post subject: The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
The May 11, 2009 Township Committee meeting agenda has been posted.
http://www.cranburytownship.org/TC_Agenda_051109.pdf