Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Guest"]You also have to be aware of the "incentives." Sometimes the state will withhold funds if you do not follow their recommendations. Otherwise, why would they make it a law instead of just sending a letter or offering a purchasing course?[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
publius
Posted: Tue, Dec 22 2009, 12:39 am EST
Post subject: Re: More Mandates from Trenton
Mandates wrote:
Maybe during the training, Cranbury can teach how useful spending loads of money on an OLD WOODEN BARN can be.
hahahahahaha.................
spending $200.+ a month to store an old barn?
you coulda built a new one for less.
Guest
Posted: Mon, Dec 21 2009, 6:49 pm EST
Post subject: Re: More Mandates from Trenton
You also have to be aware of the "incentives." Sometimes the state will withhold funds if you do not follow their recommendations. Otherwise, why would they make it a law instead of just sending a letter or offering a purchasing course?
Guest
Posted: Mon, Dec 21 2009, 6:20 pm EST
Post subject: Re: More Mandates from Trenton
The problem is we spend a lot of money on training. In addition, we don't see the outline for course hours or cost. As someone who has done a lot of training and certification I can attest that even seemingly easy certificates can entail a lot of class room time and expense.
Guest
Posted: Mon, Dec 21 2009, 5:53 pm EST
Post subject: Re: More Mandates from Trenton
This one seems pretty toothless. I doesn't require any new hiring and simply "encourages" training.
Mandates
Posted: Mon, Dec 21 2009, 3:52 pm EST
Post subject: Re: More Mandates from Trenton
Maybe during the training, Cranbury can teach how useful spending loads of money on an OLD WOODEN BARN can be.
Guest
Posted: Fri, Dec 18 2009, 8:04 pm EST
Post subject: More Mandates from Trenton
Along the lines of pushing for consolidation from the Cranbury Press. Here is a prime example of the state continuing to force mandates on small towns like Cranbury and thus costing us more money. The state views towns like Cranbury the same as Trenton or Newark. They don't distinguish whether small towns need the same staff restrictions or training. Heck, the bill alone mentions towns' contracting units.
Corzine has now signed legislation requiring the town to have an employee be certified as a qualified purchasing agent which means more training and more expense. This is a prime example where a city may need this position or person, but a town like Cranbury can do without since all purchasing over 17,500 is done by bid and the TC has the same review under 17,500 that they would have with a QPA. Perhaps the Cranbury Press will do an editorial on all the unnecessary mandates.
Story below
Gov. Jon Corzine Thursday signed legislation designed to encourage improved local government spending oversight.
The new law will encourage most units of local government to employ at least one qualified purchasing agent in their contracting unit. The measure does not require the hiring of a new employee; rather, it provides incentives for ensuring an employee has the training, state certification and authority to perform the duties of a qualified purchasing agent.
"Taxpayers at every level are demanding greater accountability," said Assemblyman John F. McKeon (D-Essex), the sponsor. "Ensuring that purchasing agents meet certain standards can protect money from being wasted. In this global recession we have a responsibility to make sure that every taxpayer dollar is being spent efficiently."
McKeon said the new law has even greater significance in light of recent SCI and state comptroller reports that uncovered wasteful local government spending. He said the law has the potential to achieve cost savings by ensuring efficient use of every taxpayer dollar received by local governments.
"Before we entrust a purchasing agent to the oversight of millions of tax dollars each year we must ensure that these individuals are qualified and certified," McKeon said. "Ensuring purchasing agents are properly educated and trained would just be common sense and a way we have to know that every tax dollar is being spent efficiently at every level of government."
The law will take effect in one year.