Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="yankee"]Hi all, Well yesterday was quite the day . It was nice to have Pari Stave with us to represent the council along with Don Patterson, David Cook, John Ritter, Mike Palumbo, Val Ochoa, Mary Demilt, Tony and Lisa Coniglione. We also had a letter from Lisa Beamer and Susan Mavoides faxed over her comments. We sat at the Assembly Housing and Local Government Committee meeting for five hours and were the last to speak. We told Cranbury’s story and the committee was clearly shocked at the impact their bill would make on Cranbury. The chairman of the committee was familiar with our town and said that this was not the intent of the bill. I assured him that we realize this but, it will in effect result in the demise of our town. The supporters of the bill that were at this meeting all gave me their word on public record and in a room full of people that they will do their best to make changes on the bill to provide a “Release Valve” for model towns like Cranbury who have been compliant with COAH Rules and who can not build large numbers of new units in their towns due to infrastructure restrictions or the like. I held their feet to the fire by asking them again at the end of our very public conversation to ensure that I have their word on following through with this promise. Although they all chuckled, they agreed on record to do their best. ( I know this could all be lip service but I felt it may be the real deal.) Dave Cook and I worked the room after the meeting broke up. I spoke to an assemblywoman who is a supporter of the bill. She gave me her card and told me she would help in tracking our progress. She was a mom like me when she got involved in politics and we had a very heartfelt conversation regarding kids, public service and how to get Cranbury out of this mess. She said she will speak to Robert’s about Cranbury’s story. Another woman on the council, ( I did not get her name) actually came up to me after the meeting hugged and kissed me and told me how terrific we were. I asked her if this RCA ban can be played with or is it a streamrolled done deal. She said it can absolutely be tweaked to help towns like us. The bill was voted on yesterday and it was passed on a 2-4 vote. It needs to be passed by the Senate to actually go into effect. My hope is that we can have this “Release Valve” added to the bill to allow towns that qualify to conitnue using RCAs. David Cook is looking into who is in charge of making revisions to the bill before it hits the Senate. We as a town need to then work as a team to tell these people Cranbury’s story via e-mail and regular mail and ask for the release valve to be put into place. I will get back to all of you once we have organized this information. Our council members and COAH subcommittee are working on pulling this together with me and I have a call into Linda Greenstein already. If you see Kathy Cunningham our townships clerk, give her a hug. She was key in yesterday’s progress. Another piece of good news….. An assembly person who defended RCAs walked over to speak with John Ritter after the vote and said that the senate had a bill that was diametrically opposed to Roberts Bill. This may also save us as far as the RCA battle goes. If you are on my e-mail distribution list, you will be getting this message some time next week. I do not have time to send it out today. I am a little overwhelmed at the moment and my five year has been staring at me for the last half hour asking me to play and wondering who this Aunt COAH person is that I am always on the phone about. I do not check this forum often but Mike Palumbo telling about some of the postings. We will get through this with flying colors and tell our kids stories about it when we are older. J Kelly Lehman[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Cranbury Conservative
Posted: Wed, May 28 2008, 10:50 am EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
How do we get on the e-mail list for updates???
Further can all updates which are e-mailed be posted here as well, so that everyone can be aware?
James
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 10:01 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
First off, great joband thanks to everyone who attended.
Second, this is a concern that it went forward and NJ politicians are not necessarily the most honest, hello UMDNJ. They believe in saying what you want so hopefully there will be someone powerful enough who will take up the cause of Cranbury and put in the release valve.
Third, I always am amazed that they look at COAH and in the same breath say NJ needs affordable housing because housing costs so much. If our policticians were not doube dipping, giving union kickbacks and actually managed the state like a business our taxes would be lower. As a result, housing costs would not be as signifigant and COAH could be reduced because more people could afford market priced homes. Unfortunately, these politicians want their money and power, and therefore look to other solutions that do not impact them personally on a negative basis. With COAH, they stand to make friends with the builders lobby, the unions who the builders use and low income advocates and at the same time look as though they are standing up for the little guy. All positives for an elected person in Trenton and at no expense to their careers.
yankee
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 5:34 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
Dietrich Wahlers was also at yesterday’s meeting in Trenton to show support for Cranbury Town.
edk
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 4:18 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
yankee wrote:
We told Cranbury’s story and the committee was clearly shocked at the impact their bill would make on Cranbury.
Good job Kelly and gang, wish I could've been there with you.
Its clear to me that we Cranbury taxpayers and the TC both need to work together to punch up the volume (and focus even more) in targeting the decision makers (legislators) of these affordable housing Bills in Trenton. They need not be shocked in the public meeting when our reps address them about our Cranbury's specific plight.
We're a small town but our voice should be loud in Trenton and laser focused on the right people who can change our fate.
I find it ironic that all the hard work of prior administrations such as Christine Whitman to preserve a good lifestyle and history in NJ is being reversed by these new Trenton initiatives. I know there is a place for both Affordable Housing and Preservation. Let's help our own reps make this message clear in Trenton and with Corzine.
Have we ever hosted the Governor in Cranbury? I'd like to take him over to the Cranbury Inn and talk to him direct about our specific issues. Maybe on Cranbury Day.
NoGoodTrenton
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 3:09 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
Quote:
Abolish "regional contribution agreements," (RCAs) ending the practice of allowing municipalities to duck their affordable housing responsibilities.
"This also ends the practice of preserving our Farming Community here in historic Cranbury." I would like to add.
This was indeed a very poor outcome for Cranbury since this bill HAS moved forward and WAS passed to the next step in legislatory process. It will make it even harder to change. Remember what's in the greater good for affordable housing in NJ will destroy Cranbury forever. Also, no other township has a one for one burden as we do, and now the Bill is in the committee that Robert's chairs and he is the proponent for these inaccurate COAH rules from the start.
There's too much momentum with this BILL and its focus to promote affordable housing in NJ. We need to find allies in Trenton that can champion both Preservation and Affordability - Cranbury is a poster child for both these ideals but in a good balance. And that’s the message we need to send to TRENTON.
Does TRENTON have a 1 to 1 ratio??
or MILBURN, CROSSWICKS, CHATAM, WANE, PRINCETON?
or any other township in NJ expected to have the same burden as Cranbury?
Thanks to all the representatives from Cranbury that attended, I can see now how difficult it will be for us to change this BILL in Trenton. What’s the next step for us?
Jersey Dad
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 1:46 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
Thank you to the team that went to Trenton, yesterday. Although there were good reasons that many people could not attend, there are still opportunities to make our voices heard. Baroni's office recommended that concerned citizens reach out directly to Speaker Roberts.
Comments can be submitted online to:
http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/members/BIO.asp?Leg=16
Letters & Calls to:
Assembly Speaker Roberts
Brooklawn Shopping Plaza
Rt. 130 South & Browning Rd.
Brooklawn, NJ 08030
(856) 742-7600
traveler
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 1:13 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
I want to personally thank the Cranbury contingent who traveled to Trenton to attend the meeting. It's nice to know that someone has taken the initiative to fight on behalf of our historic jewel of a town. No one knows how this COAH biz will all play out but at least a few had the bravado to stand up and have their voices heard.
yankee
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 1:05 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
COMPREHENSIVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REFORM PLAN CLEARS ASSEMBLY PANEL
Bill Would Implement Most Comprehensive Reform of State's Affordable Housing Laws in Over Two Decades
(TRENTON) - The Assembly Housing and Local Government Committee today released landmark legislation to reform the state's affordable housing program by implementing more equitable housing practices and increasing affordable housing availability across the state.
The measure is sponsored by Assembly Speaker Joseph J. Roberts, Jr., Assembly Majority Leader Bonnie Watson Coleman, Assembly Speaker Pro-Tempore-designate Jerry Green, Assemblymen Tom Giblin and Albert Coutinho, and Assemblywoman Mila Jasey.
"The Legislature can no longer take an ostrich-like view of the state's housing policy," said Roberts (D-Camden). "New Jerseyans need homes they can afford and jobs they can reach. The state must lead by example by expanding access to equitable and affordable housing."
The bill (A-500) would overhaul the state's affordable housing laws for the first time in over two decades to provide more low- and middle-income New Jersey families with access to housing in communities across the state.
Roberts said he took action to craft the measure following reports that indicated many New Jersey families are pulling up stakes and moving elsewhere because they can no longer afford to live in the state.
"The time has finally come for New Jersey to open the door to affordable housing for the countless working families who are in need of a reasonably priced place to call home," said Watson Coleman (D-Mercer). "Every New Jerseyan deserves to have a choice in where they live and access to a home that is within their means."
"Low-income New Jersey families are burdened by some of the highest rents and housing costs in the nation," said Green (D-Union), chairman of the housing panel. "We have a moral responsibility to countless New Jerseyans - disabled residents, families living on limited incomes, and senior citizens - to ensure access to housing is safe and affordable."
Roberts (D-Camden) said he and his colleagues have been working to refine the measure since the proposal was first unveiled last November.
The multi-faceted plan is aimed at increasing production of affordable housing and easing the ability of working families to secure an affordable place to live. Specifically the bill would:
Abolish "regional contribution agreements," (RCAs) ending the practice of allowing municipalities to duck their affordable housing responsibilities while generating new funding through a 2.5 percent fee on nonresidential development. These funds may be used for new construction or rehabilitation of affordable housing units;
Establish a 20-percent affordable housing set aside for all state-assisted development projects - including smart growth areas and transit villages;
Promote the production of housing units by setting-aside 25 percent of all affordable housing for families earning less than 30 percent of the state's median income and;
Require one-for-one replacement of deed-restricted affordable housing units lost through redevelopment;
Create an "Affordable Housing Trust Fund;"
Require towns to commit municipal housing trust fund dollars to affordable housing within their borders;
Allows municipalities to collectively provide affordable housing to promote targeted growth based on employment opportunities and transportation;
Mandate municipalities to provide density bonuses to developers constructing inclusionary developments;
Permit private developers of inclusionary development projects to compete for federal low-income tax credits;
Require all state agencies, when creating new rules, to include a housing affordability impact statement in their rule publication;
Establish a state Housing Commission charged with developing an annual strategic housing plan and submitting annual reports to the Legislature;
Ensure a better system for tracking progress on affordable housing through regular publication of statistical reports;
"We must give state officials, towns and developers every tool possible to promote the construction of new affordable housing," said Giblin (D-Essex). "By working together, the public and private sector can make the dream of home ownership a reality for working families.
"New Jersey cannot continue as a state comprised of towns where a lack of affordable housing blocks police, firefighters, or teachers from living in the communities they serve," said Coutinho (D-Essex). "This overhaul of the state's affordable housing laws is long overdue."
The legislation was crafted after a review of housing policies in other states and following discussion with the Department of Community Affairs, other legislators, and input from a wide array of organizations: Housing and Community Development Network, Coalition for Affordable Housing and Environment, Homes for New Jersey, the Apartment Associations, New Jersey Chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties and New Jersey League of Municipalities.
"Thousands of working New Jersey families spend upwards of one-third of their hard earned incomes just to keep a roof over their heads," said Jasey (D-Essex). "New Jersey must make significant changes to its affordable housing policies to bring real relief to the many New Jersey families who are struggling to keep up with the ever-growing cost of housing."
The measure was released 4 to 2. It now heads to the Assembly Appropriations Committee for further consideration.
-- 30 --
Contact:
Assembly Speaker Roberts
Assembly Majority Leader Watson Coleman
yankee
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 1:04 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
The bill not pass the assembly. it was voted out of committee and now goes to the house appropriations commottee for more discussion.
Guest
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 12:58 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
It was great that the Cranbury residents were in attendance and helped to shed a light on the increase of dollars for the RCA and how it negatively impacts Cranbury and growing town like us.
However, Richards want to eventually do away with RCA's and this is the first step.
I find it interesting that you stated that they verbally promised a "release valve" but passed the resolution anyway without it. This is not a win in the Cranbury Column and the fight must continue with the next step to lobby the senate to veto this bill that has been passed onto them. Make them send it back to the drawing board.
Frugality In Cranbury
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 12:40 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
Just a word of warning, be very careful what you accept and approve to be added to a bill. Trenton will hold Cranbury's "feet to the fire" by telling us that representatives from our community had negotiated and backed the bill as is. You really need to let them know you do not want there bill to go further - Do not accept a "release valve" promise. This will not reduce the number of COAH homes.
yankee
Posted: Fri, May 23 2008, 12:28 pm EDT
Post subject: YESTERDAY'S TRENTON COAH MEETING
Hi all,
Well yesterday was quite the day . It was nice to have Pari Stave with us to represent the council along with Don Patterson, David Cook, John Ritter, Mike Palumbo, Val Ochoa, Mary Demilt, Tony and Lisa Coniglione. We also had a letter from Lisa Beamer and Susan Mavoides faxed over her comments. We sat at the Assembly Housing and Local Government Committee meeting for five hours and were the last to speak. We told Cranbury’s story and the committee was clearly shocked at the impact their bill would make on Cranbury. The chairman of the committee was familiar with our town and said that this was not the intent of the bill. I assured him that we realize this but, it will in effect result in the demise of our town.
The supporters of the bill that were at this meeting all gave me their word on public record and in a room full of people that they will do their best to make changes on the bill to provide a “Release Valve” for model towns like Cranbury who have been compliant with COAH Rules and who can not build large numbers of new units in their towns due to infrastructure restrictions or the like. I held their feet to the fire by asking them again at the end of our very public conversation to ensure that I have their word on following through with this promise. Although they all chuckled, they agreed on record to do their best. ( I know this could all be lip service but I felt it may be the real deal.)
Dave Cook and I worked the room after the meeting broke up. I spoke to an assemblywoman who is a supporter of the bill. She gave me her card and told me she would help in tracking our progress. She was a mom like me when she got involved in politics and we had a very heartfelt conversation regarding kids, public service and how to get Cranbury out of this mess. She said she will speak to Robert’s about Cranbury’s story.
Another woman on the council, ( I did not get her name) actually came up to me after the meeting hugged and kissed me and told me how terrific we were. I asked her if this RCA ban can be played with or is it a streamrolled done deal. She said it can absolutely be tweaked to help towns like us.
The bill was voted on yesterday and it was passed on a 2-4 vote. It needs to be passed by the Senate to actually go into effect. My hope is that we can have this “Release Valve” added to the bill to allow towns that qualify to conitnue using RCAs.
David Cook is looking into who is in charge of making revisions to the bill before it hits the Senate. We as a town need to then work as a team to tell these people Cranbury’s story via e-mail and regular mail and ask for the release valve to be put into place. I will get back to all of you once we have organized this information.
Our council members and COAH subcommittee are working on pulling this together with me and I have a call into Linda Greenstein already. If you see Kathy Cunningham our townships clerk, give her a hug. She was key in yesterday’s progress.
Another piece of good news….. An assembly person who defended RCAs walked over to speak with John Ritter after the vote and said that the senate had a bill that was diametrically opposed to Roberts Bill. This may also save us as far as the RCA battle goes.
If you are on my e-mail distribution list, you will be getting this message some time next week. I do not have time to send it out today. I am a little overwhelmed at the moment and my five year has been staring at me for the last half hour asking me to play and wondering who this Aunt COAH person is that I am always on the phone about. I do not check this forum often but Mike Palumbo telling about some of the postings.
We will get through this with flying colors and tell our kids stories about it when we are older.
J
Kelly Lehman