| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed, Aug 25 2010, 10:50 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
 |
|
| Oh my goodness, from another historic town....popped in on this discussion-from ranting to rumours and gossip to guessing..! Entertaining but = I think I'll advise a friend looking to relocate to look elsewhere! Issues like parking get inherited by the new folk! Hum... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat, Aug 28 2010, 8:20 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: |
1) Since that HPAC approval happened under the pretense that it did not preclude Main access, because the application requires variances to be seen in front of the zoning board, and because proper elements of the application’s impact have not been properly represented, the application and all previous approvals should be dismissed and the application begun anew.
|
So if the township boards aren't doing their jobs properly and "several, unaddressed variances are needed," why do the Maplewood residents have to spend their money bringing a lawsuit to remedy the situation? It seems to me that the burden is on the township to protect the town and it's citizens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Aug 29 2010, 12:28 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| NOt sure. Parking on Main, down to and including Scott has been open all week. Must be because there is not a lot going on in town. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Aug 29 2010, 1:56 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | NOt sure. Parking on Main, down to and including Scott has been open all week. Must be because there is not a lot going on in town. |
The Blue Rooster is on vacation |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Aug 29 2010, 3:57 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | NOt sure. Parking on Main, down to and including Scott has been open all week. Must be because there is not a lot going on in town. |
The Blue Rooster is on vacation |
I heard the other reason is that they cancelled the daily meetings of the BRitRoAE Society (Blue Rooster is the Root of All Evil Society), but then I heard that group only occupies 1 parking spot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Aug 29 2010, 4:58 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| I don't understand why everytime the Blue Rooster is mentioned you feel you have to defend it as if you are being viciously attacked. All posters have the right, as you do, to state how they feel. That is why we are on this site. In this case however you are becoming just a little too sensitive. All that was said was that they are on vacation. It is as if you are the Blue Roosters owner. If you are... enjoy the vacation. If your not...maybe you should take one. Either way, the fact remains that parking has been better on Main and Scott. Whats the problem? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Aug 29 2010, 6:44 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | I don't understand why everytime the Blue Rooster is mentioned you feel you have to defend it as if you are being viciously attacked. All posters have the right, as you do, to state how they feel. That is why we are on this site. In this case however you are becoming just a little too sensitive. All that was said was that they are on vacation. It is as if you are the Blue Roosters owner. If you are... enjoy the vacation. If your not...maybe you should take one. Either way, the fact remains that parking has been better on Main and Scott. Whats the problem? |
lighten up Francis. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Aug 29 2010, 9:58 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | I don't understand why everytime the Blue Rooster is mentioned you feel you have to defend it as if you are being viciously attacked. All posters have the right, as you do, to state how they feel. That is why we are on this site. In this case however you are becoming just a little too sensitive. All that was said was that they are on vacation. It is as if you are the Blue Roosters owner. If you are... enjoy the vacation. If your not...maybe you should take one. Either way, the fact remains that parking has been better on Main and Scott. Whats the problem? |
I'm not the previous poster but my sense is there is one poster who has some personal beef with the Blue Roooster who seems to look for any excuse to try and trash it here. They have always been anonymous and when they tried to suggest the "defenders" (i.e. anyone who doesn't agree with their trashing) were employees a number of people signed their posts and clearly were not. That shut the person up for a while but of course they never signed their name and any time a new post shows up they look for an excuse to bring the Blue Rooster into the discussion. We could be talking about traffic or parking or the planning board or the school board or Route 130 or Gov. Christie and somehow it all comes back to how evil the Blue Rooster is... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Aug 29 2010, 10:42 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | I don't understand why everytime the Blue Rooster is mentioned you feel you have to defend it as if you are being viciously attacked. All posters have the right, as you do, to state how they feel. That is why we are on this site. In this case however you are becoming just a little too sensitive. All that was said was that they are on vacation. It is as if you are the Blue Roosters owner. If you are... enjoy the vacation. If your not...maybe you should take one. Either way, the fact remains that parking has been better on Main and Scott. Whats the problem? |
I'm not the previous poster but my sense is there is one poster who has some personal beef with the Blue Roooster who seems to look for any excuse to try and trash it here. They have always been anonymous and when they tried to suggest the "defenders" (i.e. anyone who doesn't agree with their trashing) were employees a number of people signed their posts and clearly were not. That shut the person up for a while but of course they never signed their name and any time a new post shows up they look for an excuse to bring the Blue Rooster into the discussion. We could be talking about traffic or parking or the planning board or the school board or Route 130 or Gov. Christie and somehow it all comes back to how evil the Blue Rooster is... |
You are just plain wrong. In the 70 post there is no mention of the Blue Rooster,except the third which was apparently also written by you. The only posts about the blue rooster are your own. Maybe its you who has a hidden agenda. A little publicity goes a long way. Let the Blue rooster worry about itself and lets get back to the real issues; parking, zoning,and Sweetwater. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scott
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Aug 30 2010, 7:24 am EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | I don't understand why everytime the Blue Rooster is mentioned you feel you have to defend it as if you are being viciously attacked. All posters have the right, as you do, to state how they feel. That is why we are on this site. In this case however you are becoming just a little too sensitive. All that was said was that they are on vacation. It is as if you are the Blue Roosters owner. If you are... enjoy the vacation. If your not...maybe you should take one. Either way, the fact remains that parking has been better on Main and Scott. Whats the problem? |
I'm not the previous poster but my sense is there is one poster who has some personal beef with the Blue Roooster who seems to look for any excuse to try and trash it here. They have always been anonymous and when they tried to suggest the "defenders" (i.e. anyone who doesn't agree with their trashing) were employees a number of people signed their posts and clearly were not. That shut the person up for a while but of course they never signed their name and any time a new post shows up they look for an excuse to bring the Blue Rooster into the discussion. We could be talking about traffic or parking or the planning board or the school board or Route 130 or Gov. Christie and somehow it all comes back to how evil the Blue Rooster is... |
Have to agree. It seems there are always threads that come back to the BR for some reason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Aug 30 2010, 8:24 am EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | I don't understand why everytime the Blue Rooster is mentioned you feel you have to defend it as if you are being viciously attacked. All posters have the right, as you do, to state how they feel. That is why we are on this site. In this case however you are becoming just a little too sensitive. All that was said was that they are on vacation. It is as if you are the Blue Roosters owner. If you are... enjoy the vacation. If your not...maybe you should take one. Either way, the fact remains that parking has been better on Main and Scott. Whats the problem? |
I'm not the previous poster but my sense is there is one poster who has some personal beef with the Blue Roooster who seems to look for any excuse to try and trash it here. They have always been anonymous and when they tried to suggest the "defenders" (i.e. anyone who doesn't agree with their trashing) were employees a number of people signed their posts and clearly were not. That shut the person up for a while but of course they never signed their name and any time a new post shows up they look for an excuse to bring the Blue Rooster into the discussion. We could be talking about traffic or parking or the planning board or the school board or Route 130 or Gov. Christie and somehow it all comes back to how evil the Blue Rooster is... |
You are just plain wrong. In the 70 post there is no mention of the Blue Rooster,except the third which was apparently also written by you. The only posts about the blue rooster are your own. Maybe its you who has a hidden agenda. A little publicity goes a long way. Let the Blue rooster worry about itself and lets get back to the real issues; parking, zoning,and Sweetwater. |
See there you go again. That was my first post in this entire topic. I haven't even been on this board in a couple weeks before yesterday. And your only response is to try and attack anyone who doesn't agree with you and make-up connections that don't exist, probably to deflect attention from your own agenda whatever it is. And I have no idea what you are referring to about the only posts being mine because I only read the last two pages of this topic but I was resplying to a post presumably from you already referencing the Blue Rooster so by definition they couldn't be all from me, or if so I am both me and you. And I don't want to be associated with you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Aug 30 2010, 9:06 am EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
THE BLUR ROOSTER LIVES !!!!!!
Coca Doodle Doo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Aug 30 2010, 10:59 am EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: |
1) Since that HPAC approval happened under the pretense that it did not preclude Main access, because the application requires variances to be seen in front of the zoning board, and because proper elements of the application’s impact have not been properly represented, the application and all previous approvals should be dismissed and the application begun anew.
|
So if the township boards aren't doing their jobs properly and "several, unaddressed variances are needed," why do the Maplewood residents have to spend their money bringing a lawsuit to remedy the situation? It seems to me that the burden is on the township to protect the town and it's citizens. |
Can we get back to the real business in town |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Aug 30 2010, 9:45 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: |
1) Since that HPAC approval happened under the pretense that it did not preclude Main access, because the application requires variances to be seen in front of the zoning board, and because proper elements of the application’s impact have not been properly represented, the application and all previous approvals should be dismissed and the application begun anew.
|
So if the township boards aren't doing their jobs properly and "several, unaddressed variances are needed," why do the Maplewood residents have to spend their money bringing a lawsuit to remedy the situation? It seems to me that the burden is on the township to protect the town and it's citizens. |
Can we get back to the real business in town |
Haven't been to "the board" ina while but can't help but respond since I am the first quoted here.
First, I am not saying the boards aren't doing their jobs. Sometimes it requires representation to show the truth of an issue. I have no problem with that. I am just trying to prevent unnecessary expenditures of my and fellow taxpayers monies by urging some township leadership to get caught up on the matter and provide some reasonable leadership.
About the "real business" poster. You sound like you are a township representative. If so, then clearly you are not understanding the issue and concern of your constituents or else"real" business in this town needs a closer look. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue, Aug 31 2010, 10:51 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Sorry, no, I am not on any of your boards. I meant the real business is Maplewood business and not Blue Rooster bashing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Sep 6 2010, 9:29 am EDT Post subject: Re: Why was the Sweetwater discussion locked? |
|
|
| Is Sweetwater still on the Planning Board agenda for 9/16? Any new news? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
