| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue, Oct 26 2010, 6:22 pm EDT Post subject: Re: The October 25, 2010 Township Committee meeting agenda |
 |
|
| I would hazard to guess that the TC did not do this without analysis. So rather than discuss rumor or speculation on value or ability, why not email the TC and ask for their comment? I attended the meeting last night and only one resident asked a question. If this many people were concerned, then why not go to the meeting and ask your questions? Or email the TC get a response and post it here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue, Oct 26 2010, 7:09 pm EDT Post subject: Re: The October 25, 2010 Township Committee meeting agenda |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | I would hazard to guess that the TC did not do this without analysis. So rather than discuss rumor or speculation on value or ability, why not email the TC and ask for their comment? I attended the meeting last night and only one resident asked a question. If this many people were concerned, then why not go to the meeting and ask your questions? Or email the TC get a response and post it here? |
Of course what you are suggesting would be reasonable. But if I were reasonable, I would not be on the internet. It is a plot. A dirty Chi-com plot to take over Cranbury. They will then flouridate or water and take control of our precious bodily fluids. The TC is made up of liberal commies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue, Oct 26 2010, 8:11 pm EDT Post subject: Re: The October 25, 2010 Township Committee meeting agenda |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | Guest wrote: | | I would hazard to guess that the TC did not do this without analysis. So rather than discuss rumor or speculation on value or ability, why not email the TC and ask for their comment? I attended the meeting last night and only one resident asked a question. If this many people were concerned, then why not go to the meeting and ask your questions? Or email the TC get a response and post it here? |
Of course what you are suggesting would be reasonable. But if I were reasonable, I would not be on the internet. It is a plot. A dirty Chi-com plot to take over Cranbury. They will then flouridate or water and take control of our precious bodily fluids. The TC is made up of liberal commies. |
Actually the fluoridation will be used for mind control.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
guest333
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Oct 27 2010, 5:01 pm EDT Post subject: Re: The October 25, 2010 Township Committee meeting agenda |
|
|
| guest666 has a good point. why not keep the 2 positions as 2 positions? why combine them into 1 full time position when obviously they could be performed as 2 part time positions? this would save taxpayer money on benefits and pensions. also, 2 positions would add to the economy--2 people working (especially with this salary) is better than 1! more time for them to shop and spend their salary! another advantage is that tenure would not be issue when that time comes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Oct 27 2010, 5:36 pm EDT Post subject: Re: The October 25, 2010 Township Committee meeting agenda |
|
|
| guest333 wrote: | | guest666 has a good point. why not keep the 2 positions as 2 positions? why combine them into 1 full time position when obviously they could be performed as 2 part time positions? this would save taxpayer money on benefits and pensions. also, 2 positions would add to the economy--2 people working (especially with this salary) is better than 1! more time for them to shop and spend their salary! another advantage is that tenure would not be issue when that time comes. |
That is not a good point. Do you have a part time boss? The township administrator is responsible for the whole township staff. They have to be there to manage the staff, conduct the workings of the township, attend meetings with other entities etc...
Did you attend the meeting and ask the question? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
