Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [http://cranbury.info] -> News | Events
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Looked into
Guest





PostPosted: Mon, Jan 2 2012, 4:50 pm EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

The town can't afford this as it is a million dollar project and how long do you make it. The state Reps are already trying to get a wall as part of the NJT expansion and have been told it is not likely. So I don't think a wall is a likely scenario anytime in the near future.
Back to top
Wally
Guest





PostPosted: Mon, Jan 2 2012, 8:30 pm EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

Looked into wrote:
The town can't afford this as it is a million dollar project and how long do you make it. The state Reps are already trying to get a wall as part of the NJT expansion and have been told it is not likely. So I don't think a wall is a likely scenario anytime in the near future.


How does the cost of the wall compare to the cost of the bridge?
Back to top
Costs
Guest





PostPosted: Mon, Jan 2 2012, 9:13 pm EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

The bridge has to be done a wall does not. A wall costs about a million dollars a mile. The dam will be at least a couple million. Add in possible COAH and there is no way the town can afford this. I don't mind paying taxes, but they should be on needs.
Back to top
guestsquared
Guest





PostPosted: Mon, Jan 2 2012, 9:14 pm EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

Wally wrote:
Looked into wrote:
The town can't afford this as it is a million dollar project and how long do you make it. The state Reps are already trying to get a wall as part of the NJT expansion and have been told it is not likely. So I don't think a wall is a likely scenario anytime in the near future.


How does the cost of the wall compare to the cost of the bridge?


The bridge will probably never be built. Too many issues with the environmental impact.
Back to top
Wally
Guest





PostPosted: Mon, Jan 2 2012, 10:11 pm EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

Costs wrote:
The bridge has to be done a wall does not. A wall costs about a million dollars a mile. The dam will be at least a couple million. Add in possible COAH and there is no way the town can afford this. I don't mind paying taxes, but they should be on needs.


My understanding is, at the same time the town agreed to allow for a warehouse district, the town agreed to put in a truck bypass (Liberty Way) to minimize to some extent the impact of truck traffic on the residential part of town. The town must have planned to to spend a couple million dollars on the truck bypass and bridge. Now that the bypass/bridge is estimate to cost more than $10 million, and is consequently postponed indefinitely, a wall appears to be a more cost effective solution.

On the other hand, doing nothing is sort of like a bait and switch, don't you think?
Back to top
Nope
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 12:22 am EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

Wally wrote:
Costs wrote:
The bridge has to be done a wall does not. A wall costs about a million dollars a mile. The dam will be at least a couple million. Add in possible COAH and there is no way the town can afford this. I don't mind paying taxes, but they should be on needs.


My understanding is, at the same time the town agreed to allow for a warehouse district, the town agreed to put in a truck bypass (Liberty Way) to minimize to some extent the impact of truck traffic on the residential part of town. The town must have planned to to spend a couple million dollars on the truck bypass and bridge. Now that the bypass/bridge is estimate to cost more than $10 million, and is consequently postponed indefinitely, a wall appears to be a more cost effective solution.

On the other hand, doing nothing is sort of like a bait and switch, don't you think?


Unclear how the township builds a wall. 130 is a state highway. The township does not own the right of way. No right of way no wall. By the way this has nothing to do with bait and switch. It has to do with inflating costs, don't you think.
Back to top
tit4tat
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 6:59 am EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

Nope wrote:
Wally wrote:
Costs wrote:
The bridge has to be done a wall does not. A wall costs about a million dollars a mile. The dam will be at least a couple million. Add in possible COAH and there is no way the town can afford this. I don't mind paying taxes, but they should be on needs.


My understanding is, at the same time the town agreed to allow for a warehouse district, the town agreed to put in a truck bypass (Liberty Way) to minimize to some extent the impact of truck traffic on the residential part of town. The town must have planned to to spend a couple million dollars on the truck bypass and bridge. Now that the bypass/bridge is estimate to cost more than $10 million, and is consequently postponed indefinitely, a wall appears to be a more cost effective solution.

On the other hand, doing nothing is sort of like a bait and switch, don't you think?


Unclear how the township builds a wall. 130 is a state highway. The township does not own the right of way. No right of way no wall. By the way this has nothing to do with bait and switch. It has to do with inflating costs, don't you think.


This is a simply case of tit for tat. Zone for warehouses and we'll build a truck bypass. When it comes to warehouses we got tits, but when it comes to a bypass, we ain't got tat!
Back to top
Bridge Needed
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 7:12 am EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

The bridge became more expensive than originally thought. The bridge was planned to divert truck traffic to benefit Cranbury. The cost could be shared by the warehouses that benefit from the bridge to reduce the town's expense burden. I hope the township committee will be looking into this.
Back to top
bridgecosts
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 7:49 am EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

The Township Committees’ are regularly “looking into” the bridge. The truth is no one knows how much it would cost because of the environmental impacts on the protected wetlands it would go through. But by the last estimate it would cost you as an average property taxpayer about $6,000 for your share. And that already factors in the commercial district’s portion of taxes. As for the warehouses sharing the cost, they already are as taxpayers. So are you all up for personally contributing $6,000 in extra taxes?
Back to top
sorry
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 9:40 am EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

Honestly, I don't think the bridge is the panacea you all believe. The traffic on 130 has increased up and down 130 not just in the warehouse district of Cranbury. This traffic will go up markedly this year with the 50% increase in tolls on the turnpike. More and more people and trucks are using 130 to avoid turnpike construction and tolls. The bridge would take care of the small amount of truck traffic going from our warehouses to the turnpike. Those trucks however, are not the main cause of our noise and traffic problems on 130. 130 has become a major north south artery.
Back to top
Library
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 11:14 am EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

sorry wrote:
Honestly, I don't think the bridge is the panacea you all believe. The traffic on 130 has increased up and down 130 not just in the warehouse district of Cranbury. This traffic will go up markedly this year with the 50% increase in tolls on the turnpike. More and more people and trucks are using 130 to avoid turnpike construction and tolls. The bridge would take care of the small amount of truck traffic going from our warehouses to the turnpike. Those trucks however, are not the main cause of our noise and traffic problems on 130. 130 has become a major north south artery.



We need the library before the bridge or wall.
Back to top
guestpass
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 11:26 am EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

Library wrote:
sorry wrote:
Honestly, I don't think the bridge is the panacea you all believe. The traffic on 130 has increased up and down 130 not just in the warehouse district of Cranbury. This traffic will go up markedly this year with the 50% increase in tolls on the turnpike. More and more people and trucks are using 130 to avoid turnpike construction and tolls. The bridge would take care of the small amount of truck traffic going from our warehouses to the turnpike. Those trucks however, are not the main cause of our noise and traffic problems on 130. 130 has become a major north south artery.



We need the library before the bridge or wall.


Must be new to town if you didn't know this, but we have a perfectly nice one for a 4,000 person town already. And access to others in the area too.
Back to top
Wall
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 3:39 pm EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

I would like a wall to stop the noise from the highway before we build a bridge or build a library.
Back to top
Looks
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 6:52 pm EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

Wall wrote:
I would like a wall to stop the noise from the highway before we build a bridge or build a library.


Do you know how many people would complain about the look and cost of a wall?

Liberty way is much too expensive and the time has passed to ask the warehouses as most of the affected area is built out. Since the warehouses continually come in to appeal do you think they'd voluntarily pay millions? As it would have to be voluntary.
Back to top
Bridge
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 7:49 pm EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

I think we need the liberty way bridge to help with the increase in warehouse traffic before we build a wall or library
Back to top
Venice
Guest





PostPosted: Tue, Jan 3 2012, 10:24 pm EST    Post subject: Re: Patch.com - Route 130 South in Cranbury to be Resurfaced Reply with quote

Library wrote:
sorry wrote:
Honestly, I don't think the bridge is the panacea you all believe. The traffic on 130 has increased up and down 130 not just in the warehouse district of Cranbury. This traffic will go up markedly this year with the 50% increase in tolls on the turnpike. More and more people and trucks are using 130 to avoid turnpike construction and tolls. The bridge would take care of the small amount of truck traffic going from our warehouses to the turnpike. Those trucks however, are not the main cause of our noise and traffic problems on 130. 130 has become a major north south artery.



We need the library before the bridge or wall.


Maybe we could build the library across the brook, like the Rialto Bridge.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [http://cranbury.info] -> News | Events All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4