| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
unsightly-9488
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu, Dec 3 2015, 8:16 pm EST Post subject: boat on Jefferson |
 |
|
| I cant help but notice the boat on Jefferson rd in Shadow Oaks. This eyesore has been parked on the side of the road for some time now and its a shame we have to look at it every time we go down the road. I was just wondering if there is any zoning against this kind of thing;its starting to look like Twin Rivers out here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anon-p53s
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri, Dec 4 2015, 4:07 pm EST Post subject: Re: boat on Jefferson |
|
|
| Enjoy the weekend, stop crying. If you want to know about zoning go to the township and ask them there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-n74n
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri, Dec 4 2015, 4:16 pm EST Post subject: Re: boat on Jefferson |
|
|
Township Code 150-36
Boats on boat trailers. One boat on a boat trailer 21 feet or less in length may be parked or stored outside the confines of a building in accordance with the following requirements:
(a)
The maximum 21 feet shall include hitching devices.
(b)
All boats on boat trailers shall display a current state license and/or registration.
(c)
All boats on boat trailers shall be stored at least 10 feet from the side or rear property lines.
(d)
All boats on boat trailers shall be parked behind the face of the principal residential structure even if the structure is located behind the required front yard setback.
(e)
All boats or boat trailers shall be screened from adjoining properties so as not to be visually obtrusive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-6696
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri, Dec 4 2015, 7:50 pm EST Post subject: Re: boat on Jefferson |
|
|
| I haven't seen the boat but it sounds like it does not comply with the zoning. You could call Town Hall and the zoning officer can get involved. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-s647
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Dec 7 2015, 9:37 pm EST Post subject: Re: boat on Jefferson |
|
|
| Snooty Cranbury strikes again. Sorry not everyone can afford to live in your privileged town. Twin Rivers is just fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-1q21
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri, Dec 11 2015, 8:40 pm EST Post subject: Re: boat on Jefferson |
|
|
| anon-s647 wrote: | | Snooty Cranbury strikes again. Sorry not everyone can afford to live in your privileged town. Twin Rivers is just fine. |
These types of posts always amuse me. It's not being snooty. It's protecting the quality of the place you live and its character.
It's funny you mention twin Rivers because there's a whole street full of piece of junk boats that borders twin Rivers. Twin Rivers is not fine. It's actually very troubled community as evidenced by the mounting difficulty around financing property purchases there and troubles within their homeowners association.
Sorry to sound snooty, but we don't feel bad about protecting the aesthetic value of our town. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-6696
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Dec 13 2015, 11:42 am EST Post subject: Re: boat on Jefferson |
|
|
| anon-s647 wrote: | | Snooty Cranbury strikes again. Sorry not everyone can afford to live in your privileged town. Twin Rivers is just fine. |
What does this have to do with "affording" anything? The property owner in question can obviously afford to buy a house in Cranbury, pay property taxes and buy a recreational boat and up-keep it. So it's not to do economics. It's just about complying with the law. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-011q
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Dec 13 2015, 12:18 pm EST Post subject: Re: boat on Jefferson (moved already) |
|
|
| The boat had been moved. It was traffic hazard. Glad that it was moved. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
