| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue, Jul 15 2008, 10:32 pm EDT Post subject: Re: TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA JULY 14, 2008 7:30 P.M (ALERT PNC PETITION |
 |
|
| Guest wrote: | | don't spread rumors unless you have data. Pari works in the arts running a gallery somewhere- I believe thats correct. That I got 2nd hand so not 100% about it. |
I was asking questions. I hope that does not equate to spreading rumors, right?
I am curious as to why she was annoyed about stopping the PNC discussion.
I will be annoyed if my parents don't want to discuss with me about the nice sports car I want to buy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Jul 16 2008, 7:46 am EDT Post subject: Re: TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA JULY 14, 2008 7:30 P.M (ALERT PNC PETITION |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | don't spread rumors unless you have data. Pari works in the arts running a gallery somewhere- I believe thats correct. That I got 2nd hand so not 100% about it. |
What does her profession have to do about it one way or the other? The question was about whether the Library was her pet project which it might be even if that's not related to her career. It is well known that everything the Stout Three pursue is a pet project of one of the three of them or their friends. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Jul 16 2008, 7:55 am EDT Post subject: Re: TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA JULY 14, 2008 7:30 P.M (ALERT PNC PETITION |
|
|
| All you needed to see was her comments in the Press after the first vote. It should not be surprising that she was annoyed with the outcome from Monday's meeting. Maybe she felt that the town needs it. Or perhaps she just likes developing town services since the ballfield was also her project. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Jul 16 2008, 10:46 am EDT Post subject: Re: TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA JULY 14, 2008 7:30 P.M (ALERT PNC PETITION |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | All you needed to see was her comments in the Press after the first vote. It should not be surprising that she was annoyed with the outcome from Monday's meeting. Maybe she felt that the town needs it. Or perhaps she just likes developing town services since the ballfield was also her project. |
If she "thinks the town needs it" then let her pay for it. The TC should not be the personal slush fund for the members to pursue projects that do not have the demonstrated support of the majority of residents, with a clear understanding of the cost impact to the township.
I think she approved the ballpark because that was STout's personal pet project and she is his loyal ally. Find any example where they have not voted the same. Perhaps she is annoyed now because Stout managed to get his pet project in under the radar but hers is getting defeated in the light of day. The quid pro quo didn't work out the way she had hoped. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
