| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue, Nov 25 2008, 9:40 am EST Post subject: Re: baseball field again |
 |
|
| Quote: | | I thought the field was needed for the few students that had out-of-town games. It was meant for them, because it was a disgrace that kids had to travel and we didn't have our own field. |
Who are those precious kids who deserve such attention from the TC? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
publius
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue, Nov 25 2008, 10:52 am EST Post subject: Re: baseball field again |
|
|
Who executed the baseball field fiasco?
Come on........was George Bush behind this thing?
He seems to have the Midas touch in reverse!!!!!!!!!!!
He DID make money on that stadium in Texass. At the taxpayer's expense, of course. The only time that buffoon made money was on the taxpayer's dime.
What were you people thinking???(the ballfield AND bush) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue, Nov 25 2008, 11:09 am EST Post subject: Re: baseball field again |
|
|
| There are zero kids on Babe Ruth. If there were 5 kids even, it is highly doubtful that there would be more than a couple of games played in Cranbury. That would mean the majority of kids on the team would be inconvenienced. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue, Nov 25 2008, 11:31 am EST Post subject: Re: baseball field again |
|
|
| Guest wrote: | | There are zero kids on Babe Ruth. If there were 5 kids even, it is highly doubtful that there would be more than a couple of games played in Cranbury. That would mean the majority of kids on the team would be inconvenienced. |
So?
Isn't the field to big for the majority of kids?
OK, should we start talking about night games and the installation of lights now, or save that for some other time? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
make no sense
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue, Nov 25 2008, 11:50 am EST Post subject: Re: baseball field again |
|
|
I don't know how this ball field got started. But based on reading the posts here, building this ball field does not make sense to me, especially considering we still need to pay the maintenance fees.
I think the Rec. Committee shares the same feeling and does not want anything to do with this project. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
