View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wcody
Joined: Tue, Mar 18 2008, 9:49 am EDT Posts: 126 Location: Cranbury, NJ
|
Posted: Sun, Mar 29 2009, 2:37 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
retired wrote: | I dont know how we can complain about spending the money to wash the equipment that we as tax payers pay for. If its about the money in these times then why dont we eliminate the leave collection or the chipping service or maybe the clean up weekends ,better yet NO more snow removal just wait for the snow to melt in the spring. NOW doesnt that sound stupid. If the service doesn't personally get used by the tax payer then we hate the idea BUT REALISTICALLY we need to maintain the equipment it's a reflection on our town,when people visit. |
Please note that the $50,000 was for water reclamation after washing the equipment. This reclamation is a new mandate imposed by the state and we are looking into less expensive ways to implement. Of course, we need to wash and maintain our property but if we can find less expensive ways to meet the new mandate, it would be good for everyone in the town. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
resident for life Guest
|
Posted: Sun, Mar 29 2009, 7:06 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
Anybody know how many public works employees we have? I heard we have 12 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun, Mar 29 2009, 9:26 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
resident for life wrote: | Anybody know how many public works employees we have? I heard we have 12 |
I just looked at the Township site and found it.
The Cranbury Department of Public Works (DPW) has eight full-time employees who are responsible for Township roads, parks, buildings and grounds, maintenance of vehicles and equipment, brush and leaf disposal and other related operations.
The maintenance of 20 miles of surfaced roadways includes routine inspections, repairs, snow removal and ice control during the winter months.
DPW does routine grass mowing, athletic field marking and upkeep, litter control, and safety inspections of parks equipment. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon, Mar 30 2009, 8:41 am EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
They do a great job and will usually go above and beyond ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue, Mar 31 2009, 1:45 pm EDT Post subject: Last nights TC meeting |
|
|
Couldn't make the TC meeting last night. What happened? Any insight? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bottom LINE Guest
|
Posted: Wed, Apr 1 2009, 2:11 am EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
I'll sum it up. For the Wealthest Town in Middlesex County, all they do is complain about spending a few dollars to make the town better. Thats the bottom line. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed, Apr 1 2009, 7:28 am EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
Is that a flame post or what? Simply because there are some wealthy homes does not mean we are all wealthy or that we should spend money for the sake of spending it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed, Apr 1 2009, 8:32 am EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
bottom LINE is either joking or just insane. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed, Apr 1 2009, 8:33 am EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
Bottom LINE wrote: | I'll sum it up. For the Wealthest Town in Middlesex County, all they do is complain about spending a few dollars to make the town better. Thats the bottom line. |
I get it -- it's April Fool's Day so the post is really the opposite of the truth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
badJoke Guest
|
Posted: Wed, Apr 1 2009, 2:03 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
That's a bad joke!
Think about it, why rich people go broke? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed, Apr 1 2009, 4:36 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
Bottom LINE wrote: | I'll sum it up. For the Wealthest Town in Middlesex County, all they do is complain about spending a few dollars to make the town better. Thats the bottom line. |
Yet another (anonymous) post not worthy of a reply...but I will. The poster confuses resident participation and demands for accountability with a reluctance to spend money. If the residents don't see the investment of their tax dollars as making a town better, perhaps it is not a wise investment. Don't see any value in distinguishing between rich or poor towns, either. This is simply accountability for public finance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed, Apr 1 2009, 5:34 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
Guest wrote: | Bottom LINE wrote: | I'll sum it up. For the Wealthest Town in Middlesex County, all they do is complain about spending a few dollars to make the town better. Thats the bottom line. |
Yet another (anonymous) post not worthy of a reply...but I will. The poster confuses resident participation and demands for accountability with a reluctance to spend money. If the residents don't see the investment of their tax dollars as making a town better, perhaps it is not a wise investment. Don't see any value in distinguishing between rich or poor towns, either. This is simply accountability for public finance. |
I'm pretty sure they were kidding because its April 1. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cranbury Press Guest
|
Posted: Fri, Apr 3 2009, 1:21 am EDT Post subject: Town adopts budget |
|
|
Town adopts budget
Thursday, April 2, 2009 4:38 PM EDT
By Maria Prato-Gaines, Staff Writer
CRANBURY — The township unanimously approved its $11.345 million budget Monday, guaranteeing residents will see no municipal tax rate increase in 2009.
The municipal tax rate was set at 3.95 cents per $100 of assessed value. Under that rate, the owner of a home assessed at the township average of $635,871 can expect to pay $2,511 in municipal taxes, the same as the current year, said Denise Marabello, the township’s chief financial officer.
According to the budget, total miscellaneous revenues were down this year from $3.757 million in 2008 to $2.917 million in 2009. Total general revenues also decreased from last year’s $6.950 million to this year’s $6.710 million.
According to the budget, the township will use $1.580 million in surplus, up from $1.543.
On the expenditures side, all employees other than police with medical benefits were given 1.5 percent salary increase, which is being used to premium share toward the cost of health insurance, according to Ms. Marabello’s presentation. In all, Cranbury has 36 full-time and 37 part-time employees.
According to the budget, administrative and executive wages grew to $216,700 from $192,656; financial administration salaries grew to $172,586 from $144,550; salaries for the collection of taxes dropped to $27,900 from $47,000; buildings and grounds dropped to $36,601 from $43,895; and police salaries and wages grew to 2.032 million from $1.968 million.
Township officials decreased its capital improvement appropriations from last year’s allocated $60,000 to this year’s $50,000.
The township also lost approximately $25,000 in state aid, receiving around $615,000 in 2009.
Debt service also dipped from $3.428 million in 2008 to this year’s $1.814 million. Nine percent of the total operating budget costs were out of the municipality’s control, Ms. Marabello said, as they were state-mandated yet not offset by state funding.
The largest of these expenses include the library, which received $616,181 and both the Police and Firemen Retirement System and the Public Employee Retirement System pension, which totaled $356,015, Ms. Marabello said.
Mayor Pari Stave commended library officials who attended the meeting for their contribution of $18,000 from its surplus to the municipality to help stabilize the tax rate.
”At a time where we see cuts in municipal staffing compromising public services, I think we can be very proud (of our budget),” said Committeeman David Stout.
To view Ms. Marabello’s budget presentation in its entirety, log onto the township Web site at www.cranburytownship.org/ 2009%20budget-6.pdf.
http://www.centraljersey.com/articles/2009/04/03/cranbury_press/news/doc49d51f0f1f531832177770.txt |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stout Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Apr 4 2009, 2:32 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
”At a time where we see cuts in municipal staffing compromising public services, I think we can be very proud (of our budget),” said Committeeman David Stout.
Be proud, when the police fleet breaks down because the town decided not to replace old cars....Be proud when officers are not quick to respond because manpower is down and has not been replaced
Yea, You should be proud about putting lives at stake. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Apr 4 2009, 4:49 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
Let's cut through the drama... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Apr 4 2009, 5:00 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget |
|
|
Seriously...
So, how many fewer officers will we have? My understanding is that the town authorized purchase of police cars. Back your cry wolf statements with facts and maybe I'll agree with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|